Skip to comments.
Just a reminder: Free Republic is a conservative site
Posted on 04/11/2006 3:33:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,160, 1,161-1,180, 1,181-1,200, 1,201-1,213 next last
To: Jim Robinson
1,181
posted on
04/17/2006 9:41:49 AM PDT
by
Pippin
(Deus Meus Omnia!)
To: Jim Robinson
>"Best be thinking about how to get conservatives elected as Republicans..."<
The Medicare prescription drug plan was brought about by Republicans, signed by a Republican President.
The total unfunded liability of Medicare Part D is $16.6 trillion. Medicare now has a total unfunded liability of 61.6 trillion:
http://www.ncpa.org/prs/tst/2005/20050217tst.html "Taking all three parts of Medicare together we owe the current generation a total of $29.2 trillion and future generations will add another $32.5 trillion to this obligation. Thus, the total Medicare debt is a staggering $61.6 trillion."
http://www.ncpa.org/prs/tst/2005/20050217tst.html
What has the Republican party done to address this issue?
1,182
posted on
04/20/2006 8:08:44 AM PDT
by
FBD
(surf's up!)
To: FBD
Well, it probably wasn't brought about by conservative Republicans. Which other party has enough voters to actually get conservatives elected? Even Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo run as Republicans.
To: Jim Robinson
"Well, it probably wasn't brought about by conservative Republicans." ???
Probably? President Bush signed the Prescription Drug Act:
(16 trillion dollars of additional unfunded debt), and the majority of Republicans in BOTH the House and the Senate supported it. So, I guess the majority of Republicans are no longer fiscally conservative?
Medicare Will Consume Almost All Income Taxes by 2075: Trustee for Social Security, Medicare testifies before Senate Budget Committee
I'll ask you to consider the question again: What is the Republican party doing to address this issue? It's an additional 16 trillion dollars worth of federal debt.
It's not going to go away, by merely saying it wasn't *conservative* Republicans who brought it about.
"Which other party has enough voters to actually get conservatives elected?
"Even Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo run as Republicans."
Party be damned; I thought conservative principals came first. Someone once told me, an a FReepmail:
"Marxism is the issue. Illegal immigration is a symptom."
I'll vote for the most fiscally *conservative* candidate, regardless of what *party* he or she is in.
1,184
posted on
04/20/2006 9:09:02 AM PDT
by
FBD
(surf's up!)
To: Jim Robinson
The Republican Party and Conservatism are not synonymous. Now that Republicans have control of government, Conservatives must get control of the Republican Party.
To: Jim Robinson
1,186
posted on
04/20/2006 12:34:21 PM PDT
by
antceecee
(Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
To: Vaquero
Creationism is a Cancer on Conservatism Creationism has nothing to do with Conservatism one way or the other.
To: Quix
But my 2 cents is that evolution is not the most screaming of priorities. The general idea of evolution is perfectly sound. I assume you and others here are referring to biological evolution (macro-evolution in particular since there is plenty of evidence for micro-evolution). The US, in fact, was founded on the idea of social evolution. That society should be allowed to evolve as opposed to government designing society. Bad ideas, cultures, and values will naturally die out.
To: wolfcreek
Does this mean We have to vote for McLame if he's the nominee? /s Conservatives 08 Unless you'll prefer the alternative.
To: nosofar
Sorry.
It's a pretty boring and frustrating topic for me.
1,190
posted on
04/20/2006 2:40:22 PM PDT
by
Quix
(TRY JESUS. If you don't like Him, the devil will always take you back.-- Bible Belt Bumper Sticker)
To: FBD
Like I said, it wasn't brought about by
conservative Republicans.
But I think you're missing my larger point. I'm saying it is up to us to elect "conservatives" and in order to elect them you must have enough voters to defeat their biggest opponents and, obviously, that would be the Democrats. The only Party that has the organization and numbers of voters to do this is the Republican Party. It's up to us to support and elect the most conservative candidates as we possibly can, and that means they must run as Republicans (assuming you actually want to get them elected).
To: Jim Robinson
Well said... and for those who don't like the RINOS, get out in the trenches and start promoting true conservatives. I really think it's all about working on the so called 'grassroots' level.
I don't know if this is a good comparison, but it's kind of like the old saying "if you watch your pennies the dollars take care of themselves".... if you work to elect good solid conservatives to the lower level offices, eventually they will move up and the important state anf federal offices will 'take care of themselves'... eventually we will have some great people working for us.
1,192
posted on
04/20/2006 9:15:07 PM PDT
by
antceecee
(Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
To: nosofar
as part of the conservative voting block, evangelical Christians and their cause celeb of Creationism, it most certainly is.
While their other major contribution to the platform, banning abortion, is something tangeble and has major backing from many quarters.
1,193
posted on
04/21/2006 3:23:35 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Jim Robinson
>"It's up to us to support and elect the most conservative candidates as we possibly can, and that means they must run as Republicans"<
Yes, but that all changes when they get to Washington, doesn't it? Any newly elected firebrand conservative gets the "arm around the shoulder" talk; and the Party leadership makes it's members toe the moderate line. (If they want to keep in the good graces of the leadership.)
Consider Congressman Nick Smith's story, (and the career of his son) when he opposed the Medicare prescription drug plan:
"I was targeted by lobbyists and the congressional leadership to change my vote, being a fiscal conservative and being on record as a no vote.
Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson and Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert talked to me for a long time about the bill and about why I should vote yes.
Other members and groups made offers of extensive financial campaign support and endorsements for my son Brad who is running for my seat. They also made threats of working against Brad if I voted no. Brad heard about what was going on and called me to say he didn't want to get to Congress that way and that I should do the right thing. That added to my resolve.
I told all those urging a yes vote the same thing:
This bill will lead to explosive new costs and huge unfunded liabilities that will unfairly burden future generations.
The current unfunded liability for Medicare is about $14 trillion in current dollar value. Adding the new Medicare drug provision increases the unfunded liability by $7.6 trillion for a total of $21.6 trillion in today=s dollars. The bill promised trillions in new benefits with no idea how to pay for them other than passing the bill to future generations." -Column by Congressman Nick Smith - November 23, 2003
By the way, weren't grass roots Republican conservatives going to keep Arlen Specter from becoming Chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee? How'd that work out, anyway?
1,194
posted on
04/21/2006 4:05:37 AM PDT
by
FBD
(surf's up!)
To: Jim Robinson
To: Jim Robinson
1,196
posted on
04/28/2006 1:27:33 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thank A Legal Immigrant Who Chooses To Work Day- May 1st :::: http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
To: Jim Robinson; All
Jim, your excellent article should be "bumped" each and every day! Some here need a reality check. BTTT!
1,197
posted on
05/04/2006 11:18:33 AM PDT
by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: fairtrader
1,198
posted on
05/04/2006 11:52:04 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Jim Robinson
THANKS for posting that, Jim.
All the Bush-bashing and Constution Party talk on here was about to make me leave FR.
No candidate/party will ever be perfect. Let's just all work to make ours (the GOP) better, stronger, and more productive!
1,199
posted on
05/04/2006 11:56:47 AM PDT
by
RebekahT
("Our government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
To: RebekahT
"(the GOP)"
Are you saying that the GOP is conservative?
Not as long as the party is dominated by RINOS.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,141-1,160, 1,161-1,180, 1,181-1,200, 1,201-1,213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson