Skip to comments.
Just a reminder: Free Republic is a conservative site
Posted on 04/11/2006 3:33:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Just a reminder: Free Republic is a conservative site. We fight for conservative principles, values and causes. We defend the Constitution. We defend our borders. We defend our God-given rights. We are opposed to the liberal/socialist/Marxist agenda for America. We do not willingly give up ground to the Marxists.
It's true that the illegal immigration issue is very discouraging, and I don't know if anyone has a solution that will appeal to conservatives and yet manage to get by Democrat obstructionism, ie, a filibuster, but I don't see that as any reason to give up everything. We should not allow it to rip us apart and destroy the movement. We fight on.
We hold the majority. We continue working as hard as we possibly can to elect as many conservatives as we possibly can. We build a conservative majority that can overcome the Democrats and the RINOs. We do not willingly give up any seats to Democrats. We add seats. Preferably, conservative seats.
I would also like to remind everyone, that Free Republic does not condone racism and does not advocate violence. We exercise our first amendment rights to free speech and peaceable assembly. We do not condemn people because of their race, religion, ethnicity, skin color, etc. We do not advocate civil war, anarchy, or an overthrow of the government. We do not advocate shooting illegals or mining the borders. We do not appreciate people coming across our borders illegally, but as conservatives, we do not issue racial epithets or threaten them with violence or bodily harm.
And, yes, we are at war. And we do support our troops and their mission. We also respect our commander-in-chief and are mindful that when people disrespect him, it hurts troop morale. We do not appreciate the mainstream media's attempts to destroy America's will to fight and we do not do anything to assist the Democrats and their accomplices in the media in their treasonous mission of undermining the war effort by providing aid and comfort to the enemy.
And despite our dissatisfaction and disappointments in regards to the illegal immigration issue, we recognize that it is not the last issue on earth and there are plenty of other reasons not to allow the Marxist Democrats to retake power.
I'll list a few issues (by no means and exhaustive list) that will be adversely affected by Marxist/Democrats in power:
Islamofascism/terrorism
National Security/Defense
The United Nations (as in their control over us)
The Supreme Court
The federal judiciary
The legislative agenda
The right to life
Marriage between one man, one woman
The family
Education
Health care
Private property
Taxation
Oil/energy
The right to keep and bear arms
The right to freedom of religion
The right to self-governance
All of our God-given rights
The Constitution
The Republic
Liberty itself
Do not get so discouraged that we give it all up. It could take generations to get it back. If ever.
"Securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" is our duty.
TOPICS: Free Republic; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: adminlectureseries; agenda; america; bush; cannibalfoodfight; conservative; constitutionparty; fr; freedom; freerepublic; gop; immigration; jim; jimrob; jimrobinson; liberty; marxist; puppetmasters; reminder; robinson; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720, 721-740, 741-760 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
To: Desert_Girl
>>>Most Mexicans are Catholic, hate things like abortion, eugenics and euthanasia, and are very hardworking people, family oriented and humble<<<<
That will describe the majority of Mexicans I know, but try walking precincts in California's 42th Congressional District. (Colton, CA)
Solid Democrat. They even 'parachuted' in George Brown from Monterey Park as he was too left even for them.
So we see the stereotypes you listed don't match with reality....
To: SoCalPol
Big news flash, I have and continue to demonstrate when ever a call goes out, in Dallas, in Ft. Worth, and in front of Martin Frost's office. I have flooded switch boards will calls, sent fax's, emails, and beat the drum to get new voters to the polls. Five at my place of employment alone. BTW you know good and well that Bush kept Clinton's appointees rather than replace them with his own appointees. Too bad Freepers are so well informed, eh?
According to a full 59% of those polled on this forum in the latest poll, Republican is no longer synonymous with being conservative. We have two socialist/globalist parties, which had you rather be stabbed in the back by? That seems to be the choice left. As close as these elections have been there will be no Republican party anyway once those amnesty voters hit the box. The two party system seems to be an illusion that we actually have a voice. It's obvious that both parties strings are pulled in sync regarding globalism.
This immigration issue, isn't the issue, the sovereignty of our nation state is on the line, not tomorrow, not next week, but right now.
To: BigSkyFreeper
"These problems existed before Bush 43 was inaugurated in 2001. Clinton is responsible for the off-shoring by signing NAFTA in to law in 1994, and illegal immigration was around even during Reagan's second term."
If we are going to place blame for NAFTA, as much as I HATE Clinton and everything he stands for, George H.W. Bush is the one that is responsible for NAFTA. He betrayed the American workers when he signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in San Antonio, Texas, in 1992. IMHO.
723
posted on
04/11/2006 11:51:39 AM PDT
by
Proud Conservative2
("When people show you who they are...BELIEVE THEM the first time..." Maya Angelou)
To: MissAmericanPie
"arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" - leftist talking point.
Thanks for the illustration of my point. You're on the same side as the left, whether you admit it or not.
724
posted on
04/11/2006 11:53:38 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: Proud Conservative2
George H.W. Bush is the one that is responsible for NAFTA. He betrayed the American workers when he signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in San Antonio, Texas, in 1992. IMHO. You can also blame RINO Jim Kolbe for pushing NAFTA through the House of Representatives.
725
posted on
04/11/2006 11:53:51 AM PDT
by
Spiff
("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
To: SoCalPol
They DO want to take us with them, don't they?
I'm not going to let that happen if it takes every ounce of energy I have.
I will NOT let the left destroy this country that I love.
726
posted on
04/11/2006 11:55:32 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: Jim Robinson
Thank you Jim. Sorely needed at this juncture.
I appreciate your even handedness. I appreciate your wisdom even more.
And just because it can never be said too often:
Perfect is the enemy of good.
To: Bernard Marx
Illegal immigration is the ONLY issue that should concern Freepers.
First, I think your logic is faulty. Illegal immigration is the unlawful movement of a human from one nation to another. Abortion, on the other hand, is the willful killing of a living child. I think the latter is far more serious than the former.
Failure to address that problem realistically will lead to a permanent Democrat majority.
Secondly, many illegal immigration foes decry Reagan's amnesty program. However, about 10 years after Reagan granted amnesty, the GOP took over Congress for the first time in two generations. Twenty years after Reagan's amnesty, the GOP gained control of Congress and the Executive Branch.
I will give you this, though: continuing to harp on the illegal immigration question will lead to many Hispanics who may have voted for the GOP to vote for the Dems.
To: Bernard Marx
Illegal immigration is the ONLY issue that should concern Freepers. Unbelieveable!!
And what are we pro-life, pro-military, (or any other issue) conservatives supposed to do?
Let the abortion mills continue to butcher the unborn?? Let the left take over the military again and try to destroy it as they did under Clinton?
Your tunnel vision is extraordinary!
729
posted on
04/11/2006 11:59:21 AM PDT
by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraqi LIBERATION Vet! THANKS, son!!.)
To: Jim Robinson
for some reason, a fitting end to seemed to be
"The bombing begins in 5 minutes." LOL
730
posted on
04/11/2006 12:01:57 PM PDT
by
jw777
To: Sloth
I have asked this question before & never gotten a satisfactory answer. If the GOP knows that they will get our votes every time regardless of the candidate, then what possible incentive would they have to nominate conservative candidates instead of RINOs that will attract more center/left votes?Primaries. You vote for the most conservative in the primary, and against the anti-American democrats in the general. Look at our Supreme Court. What do you think it would look like today if "principled conservatives" had allowed Gore and/or Kerry to win the last couple of elections? It is flat out impossible for the kind of change many of us would like to see to happen instantaneously. What is within our reach is to make the large changes incrementally over a period of time. The left knows that all too well.
731
posted on
04/11/2006 12:09:14 PM PDT
by
alnick
To: beaversmom
I thank Ross Perot and Bill Clinton for the "Republican Revolution" of '94. Perot forced Republicans to eat a defeat because someone who really cared about fiscal issues cost Bush 41 the election. And only 2 years of Clinton's liberal lunacy sent Americans over the edge. Americans will vote CONSERVATIVE if given a clear choice.
732
posted on
04/11/2006 12:09:24 PM PDT
by
manwiththehands
("Rule of law"? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!)
To: COBOL2Java
"Native Criminal Class"
I like it! What did Mark Twain say about the Senate? Oh, I forgot ... that was before the 17th amendment kicked in ... and the Senate was probably OK then. :-)
733
posted on
04/11/2006 12:11:38 PM PDT
by
manwiththehands
("Rule of law"? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!)
To: Jim Robinson
Thank you for the encouraging words. They were very timely and well received.
734
posted on
04/11/2006 12:13:08 PM PDT
by
jer33 3
To: Jim Robinson
The voice of reason. Thanks, maybe my blood pressure will return to normal now.
735
posted on
04/11/2006 12:13:23 PM PDT
by
hershey
To: Wolfie
Charlie Brown kicking the football. Excellent analogy. And most of us conservatives are going to try to kick it again this November and by April (when we do our taxes) we'll be going AHHHHH!!! (WUMP!)
736
posted on
04/11/2006 12:13:44 PM PDT
by
manwiththehands
("Rule of law"? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!)
To: TET1968
Stop voting for Democrats. Simple as that.
737
posted on
04/11/2006 12:14:01 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
(There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
To: Bernard Marx
Thanks for posting what I was going to say, but better.
Every people gets the government it deserves. Add 12 million Dem voters and that government will NOT be a free republic.
The battle for our destiny is joined, and the field is the illegal issue.
To: Jim Robinson
Thank you! Wow, 700+ posts. I'm way behind.
739
posted on
04/11/2006 12:15:34 PM PDT
by
Rte66
To: tcrlaf
Oh, good grief! Do you think immigration is the ONLY issue I'm upset about????
740
posted on
04/11/2006 12:17:12 PM PDT
by
manwiththehands
("Rule of law"? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720, 721-740, 741-760 ... 1,201-1,213 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson