Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Council of La Raza Calls for National Day of Action April 10, 2006
NCLR ^ | 04/10/2006 | La Raza

Posted on 04/09/2006 11:41:00 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin

Apr 10, 2006
Description
The plan for the April 10 Day of Action came from the grassroots. The National Capital Immigrant Coalition – a coalition of immigrant, labor, faith, civil rights and business community groups in the metro, Washington, DC area – and allies around the nation, developed the concept of a National Day of Action. Their good idea caught on like wildfire and today hundreds of local grassroots organizations and coalitions are working together in cities all over America to make our voices heard. Join hundreds of thousands of people in telling Congress that we need real, comprehensive immigration reform. View of flyer for the rally in Washington, DC. For more information about rallies throughout the country, click on the link below.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dayofaction
On 16 August 1946, M. A. Jinnah, the leader of the Muslim League, declared the day a “Day of Action”, with months and weeks of propagandizing “Direct Action” among the Muslims in India. He called for a “general strike” among all “Muslims” to show “their economic power”. Pamphlets were distributed in Urdu (Persian-Iranian influenced language of the Hindustani tongue and written in the style of Arabic), using a written script of the Hindustani language that only Muslims could read and not the general populace of Hindi speaking Hindus of India which use the Devanagri script. These pamphlets used a shrill call that was much different from the “toned down” speeches that Jinnah would give in English to the benefit of Western press and authorities. In fact, these pamphlets were simply full of hate, and as effective, full of blame, and called for an independent rule of Muslims. The word “direct action” was a code word of the political wing of Islam in India and Turkey, and which meant “kill the Hindus”, “kill the Jews”, “kill the Christians”. When the Muslim League declared DIRECT ACTION DAY for the day August 16, 1946, they called for a “hartal” (strike) against all (Hindu) businesses. But to the Muslims on the streets it was clear, as communicated by the cheaply printed posters, the Muslim “yellow journalists”, the references to the “sword” in such inflammatory pamphlets, that this was a call to identity, not unity. Eventually, as their demands were met, this did not give rise to thanks, but to preparations of petrol bombs, the knives, swords, guns, bats, the preparations for communal carnage, which indeed became one of the most gruesome communal rioting on a sickening level of any modern times. A great portion of Calcutta was on fire. The macabre acts are well documented. Horrific isn’t even the word for it.

In the months, weeks, and days prior to the “Direct Action”, very few of the general populace which did not read Urdu were even aware of such preparations. The government was aware, but largely indifferent to concern. Behind a “foreign script”, the message of the Muslims was communicated and organized, unbeknownst to many but warned about by a few. The “Day of Action” came, and soon after the results became apparent. In Calcutta, soon there was violence, 5,000 killed initially in what became known as “The Great Killing”. The “Day of Action”, was followed by more, and “Direct Action” was the cry. “Direct Action” was simply the code word for intimidation and violence against anyone who did not agree to Jinnah’s claim of a “Muslim Nation” to be carved out of the borders of India. In the end, Jinnah succeeded. Jinnah was the founder of modern Pakistan, the “world’s first Muslim Nation”.

Since that time, the term “Day of Action” and “Direct Action” have often been used, typically by the left wing. In almost every case, the real agenda was to lead a general strike while at the same time the real message being intimidation, of which intimidation leads to outrageous demands, usually the demand is their own rule. As the power of such a movement grows, it always leads to violence.

A terminology among the left, the communists, socialists and their fellow travelers such as “Progressives” and “Democrats”, is the use of the term “direct action”. You will often hear this term used by the left who march, arms-locked, “in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle”.

I believe this is the case in regards to the rhetoric of the foreigners, the illegal aliens from Mexico, regarding their own “Day of Action”. This is simply a continuation of an old agenda going back to the days of Jinnah, a proven agenda, and the leadership of this movement has similar methods as used by Jinnah because they have similar designs - of which is really not about citizenship, but attempts to increase their numbers and their identity culture, an identity culture which will, without doubt, lead to demands for self-rule of their own, and with each successful demand met, their demands will grow to be more strident, and ever more demanding no matter how outrageous.

Once given this day to rule, there will be no end to it.

This all ends with division, not unity.

Jinnah eventually got his way. Today we are told, you cannot move millions of people that way, and another millions this way. But, that is exactly what this all leads to. As was the case in India in the late 1940’s. Eventually, demands were met. And, the end result - millions and million of poor and starving, millions moving out of what was once India but now Pakistan, and dying on the way. And millions moving out of India and into the “New Muslim Nation” of Pakistan, and dying on the way. Millions, and then, as one line of people crossed the next, the violence.

You see, millions of people can be moved. And, if millions and millions of illegal aliens are given this day, there were be millions and millions more coming. And all of this will lead to exactly what everyone doesn’t want - millions and millions of people moving from one place to the next, to escape each other. It doesn’t matter if there “aren’t enough buses”. The people of India, the millions didn’t use buses.

If the borders are not secured, this is all going to lead to what always happens in history. No one will be happy with the result. Not the millions coming, nor the millions leaving. And none of it will lead to “peace”. We are told the illegals are wearing “white” to symbolize “peace”. However, it is very likely, if the invasion is allowed to continue, this will lead not to peace, but like the world turned upside down it will lead to war with Mexico. When a nation gives away it’s own borders, there is no peace. It will suffer a terrible shock. Usually, the shock comes too late to stop the violence or the rupturing of their nation. A nation without borders is usually a temporary situation - it usually ends in the division of the nation, where new borders are drawn. Where new borders break down a unified nation into smaller, antagonistic, sides.

1 posted on 04/09/2006 11:41:03 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

"we need real, comprehensive immigration reform."

I agree, starting with border enforcement, severe penalties for hiring illegals, deportation of those violating our immigration laws, and a greatly expanded program to grant legal visas for those who are willing to follow the rules. It should be impossible to earn one of these guest visas if you have ever been deported.


2 posted on 04/09/2006 11:54:15 PM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
"A terminology among the left, the communists, socialists and their fellow travelers such as “Progressives” and “Democrats”, is the use of the term “direct action”. You will often hear this term used by the left who march, arms-locked, “in solidarity with the Palestinian struggle”."

This is the key to defeating the Dems in November.

3 posted on 04/10/2006 12:19:09 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

When idiots play with fire, they very often get burned.


4 posted on 04/10/2006 12:31:37 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
I should start a group called 'the race' and see how long until it is shut down...

As for the boycotts - sounds fine to me. Do it over and over again, demonstrate to us again and again how much our economy doesn't depend upon you.
5 posted on 04/10/2006 12:47:49 AM PDT by kingu (What if you held a boycott and no one noticed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin; All
I have been psuedo-blogging, for years, a couple of the elements in WWIV ( III being the Cold War ), in which we find ourselves engaged.

The first element?

Islam, a Religion of Peace®? ( links, blogs, quips, quotes, aggravating pictures ) is located here- click the Pic, and scroll backwards:

The other, somewhat interlocking element is this one:

"Thunder on the Border," click the picture:

Note, and note well--that the infamous"Mexican Flag Superior, American in Distress" is in the upper left corner...


Take a look, and follow all the links at #1158-1155.



What is happening under the radar is that the alien lobby, certain elements of radical Islam, and some on the Left share common goals, tactics, and exploitations of our system and society.



Not a conspiracy, but rather a "coming together on common points."

6 posted on 04/10/2006 3:57:56 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

I hope that all these illegal immigrants keep pressing their points all 12 to 20 million of them, I also wish that Venezuela, Peru and those other countries holding oil over our heads keep making demands on us--and maybe that American revolution will finally be started by those 60 or more million citizens getting tired of the state of our union and finally vote all the bums out. And replace them with our own nationalists.


7 posted on 04/10/2006 4:36:31 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

LaRaza is worse than the Communist Party and should be banned, and anyone who is a member should be deported.


8 posted on 04/10/2006 4:40:47 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua
Remember who voted the illegals amnesty: take revenge at the polls - I will vote for anyone who takes a stand against the invasion I am now a single issue voter - as the rapid expansion of illegals and immigrants here will change the USA forever. The founding fathers are rolling in their graves at the treason in DC.
9 posted on 04/10/2006 4:42:10 AM PDT by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Send them ALL home to Mexico and erect a big, long, solid wall bristling with electronic sensors and backed by military units.

Extreme problems require extreme solutions! Get some guts, Congress. Show yourselves men for a change.


10 posted on 04/10/2006 4:43:04 AM PDT by RoadTest (The wicked love darkness; but God's people love the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned

I could not agree with you more, I believe the acceptance of dual citizenship by this country has made us less American, we need to revoke that "right", either those wishing to reside and benefit from our nation are wholly American or they are not, loyalty needs once again to be pledged.


11 posted on 04/10/2006 5:32:28 AM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

La Raza.. Day of Indignity.

Will AG Alberto Gonzales or Villaraigosa be at one of the rallies today demanding and pleading for amnesty for all here and the more to come?

Sure easy to see what side they are both on.


12 posted on 04/10/2006 8:57:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Have you hugged an illegal alien today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Will AG Alberto Gonzales or Villaraigosa be at one of the rallies today

Naturalmenté. The U.S. AG is/was a board member for a state affiliate of La Raza in Texas. I shudder to think, he came very close to being on the SCOTUS!!!

13 posted on 04/10/2006 9:00:36 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Hey, Washington, which laws do I get to break?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson