Posted on 04/07/2006 3:10:22 AM PDT by goldstategop
The Senate has reached a “compromise” on illegal immigration. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (who, by his conduct here, just lost the ’08 nomination) called it a “huge breakthrough” – a moral collapse would be more like it.
Did anyone ask the American people – who have time and again expressed their anger, frustration and outrage over our porous borders – whether they want a compromise on illegal immigration, on an amnesty for an estimated 12 million criminal aliens?
When asked about compromises on the more contentious issues facing the Supreme Court, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia responded: How you can reach a compromise between what the Constitution really means and what judicial activists want it to mean?
How do you split the difference between reality and fantasy – between truth and lies?
The same applies to illegal immigration.
In fact, the deal that Ted Kennedy and Harry Reid worked out with Republicans like Arlen Specter, Mel Martinez, Chuck Hagel and John McCain (the quintessential un-Republican) is no compromise at all – but a blanket amnesty for border-jumpers, whether they came seven years ago or 7 minutes ago. To claim otherwise is an insult to our intelligence.
At their press conference announcing this rape of our national identity, McCain, Specter, Reid et al. couldn’t even refer to the objects of their beneficence as illegal aliens. They were undocumented workers – the weaseliest of weasel words. Sure, and the man who breaks into my house is an uninvited guest.
Perhaps the most hilarious comments at the press conference came from stand-up comic and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D, NV), who spoke of all the undocumented workers employed by Las Vegas casino-hotels, as maids, dishwashers, etc, and how much the industry has come to rely on their (cheap) labor.
Does he think the average American actually cares about the labor costs, hence the profit-margin, of Caesar’s Palace or the MGM Grand? (Gosh, whatever would we do without a gaming industry?) If they don’t want to pay an American wage and fill those jobs with American workers, why should I care about their bottom-line?
Reid sang a different tune (which sounded more like “The Star-Spangled Banner” than “The Bonaparte’s Retreat”) in 1993, when he observed: “Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. …Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care and other benefits often without paying any taxes. … These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”
What changed for Reid in the interim isn’t the reality of illegal immigration, but the rise of the lawbreakers’ lobby in his home state, combined with his becoming the Senate leader of the party of plunder and shameless pandering.
That master of politico-babble, Ted Kennedy, called the compromise “tough and fair,” which is like saying Chappaquiddick was a shinning example of responsible drinking and safe driving.
That the bill Kennedy helped to craft is an amnesty is indisputable. If an uninvited guest can prove he’s been here more than 5 years (from the effective date of January 7, 2004), he need do nothing to remain but pay a fine. The dictionary defines amnesty as “an act of forgiveness for past offenses, especially to a class of persons as a whole.”
By definition, coming to America illegally is “an offense.” Calling it a “guest-worker program” (another sniveling euphemism) doesn’t alter the fact that the compromise legislation will allow the criminals to remain here indefinitely, while escaping punishment – hence “an act of forgiveness for past offenses.” Enter national politics, and words suddenly lose any semblance of meaning.
The Great Compromise purports to be forgiveness for past offenses for some trespassers. Actually, it’s a blanket amnesty for all 12 million-plus illegals in the United States. As noted above, immigration criminals who’ve been here more than five years get a get-out-of-jail-free card.
Those who’ve resided here illegally for 2 to 5 years (from 2004) must go to one of 16 designated ports of entry and declare themselves -- as if this means anything. Then they are issued a temporary visa (that isn’t temporary at all), after which they can go home and continue their hostile occupation of American territory, and eventually apply for citizenship under the provisions of the measure.
Where the bill sorta gets tough (but only in theory) is on those who’ve been here less than two years. They are expected to depart forthwith. If they stay and are caught once, it’s a misdemeanor. Twice and it’s a felony.
How hard is it to forge a 1040-form, or a pay stub or a utility bill or a bank statement proving that Jose, who arrived here today, has been an illegal resident of the U.S. since 1999? About as hard as it is to stuff ballot boxes in Cook County.
The Senate compromise is touted as a problem-solving measure. (“Oh dear us,” its proponents wail, “We must do something to regularize all of the undocumented workers.”)
If it becomes law, it will be a major step toward solving the vexing problem of America’s national identity. Soon, we won’t have one any more.
Like the amnesties of the 1980s and the 1990s, it will result in another surge of illegal immigration. Build it, and they will come.
And those who come will have no interest in learning our language and customs, or identifying with our history and heritage. They won’t be Mexican-Americans or Haitian-Americans or hyphenated-whatevers (which would be bad enough), but Mexicans, Haitians or whatevers who happen to reside in the United States.
They and their children, and perhaps their grandchildren, won’t assimilate but be a solvent, eroding our identity as a people, year after year, decade after decade – until, eventually, America comes to be comprised of disparate national groups residing in what used to be a nation. (In less than 20 years, earlier waves that washed over our southern border have made Spanish our unofficial second language.)
Consider the words of Ronald F. Maxwell (writer/director of “Gettysburg” and “Gods And Generals”) commenting in The Washington Times:
“What is happening on the southern border is unprecedented. Not only in our own history, but in the history of the world. No country at any time, anywhere, has sustained the influx of tens of millions of foreigners across its borders … This is invasion masquerading as immigration. It may already be too late to avoid a future annexation of the Southwest by Mexico or the evolution of a Mexican-dominated satellite state.” If not, the Senate compromise will seal our fate.
That congressional Democrats favor lawbreaking and national suicide is unsurprising. They are, after all, the party of the alien and the alienated – the marginal, the misfit and the criminal.
But Republicans? Some are groveling before the illegal-immigrant lobby, whilst pursuing the mirage of an Hispanic Republican vote. Others pray in the direction of Wall Street. (Corporate America wants cheap immigrant labor, and damn the social costs -- crime, welfare and national disintegration.)
In the above-quoted commentary, Maxwell addresses these words to George W. Bush: “Mr. President, this is a time for candor. Your immigration policy is viewed as captive to the cheap labor – big business lobby and inimical to the survival of our country.” And so it is.
If Republicans lose either or both Houses of Congress this year, blame on the immigration-sellout of the McCains, Specters and Hegels.
GOP strategists think Middle Americans have no place else to go in November. We don’t have to go anywhere – just stay comfortably at home.
But that will be only the beginning. The Whig Party committed suicide by refusing to take a stand on slavery. Instead, it sought accommodations with evil, like the Compromise of 1850.
Republicans are emulating their pusillanimous predecessors. The party’s conservative base – its very essence – is furious with this unpardonable betrayal.
If this gift to illegal aliens becomes law, there will be no amnesty for the Republican Party.
Real astute.
Look at the facts: We deposed the Taliban in Afghanistan; we deposed Saddam in Iraq. Each posed a credible threat to American security. In my opinion, once those threats were neutralized, we should have pulled out of each country. Frankly, I could care less if the Islamo-fascist savages [Shia, Sunni or Kurd] bomb each other from the Medieval Age they're in now back to the Stone Age they were in in the 20th Century. You simply can't establish a democracy in among such people; that is a pipe dream.
I care only about American national interests.
The biggest threat we have to national securty right now is the crimaliens who collect our welfare, clog our schools and emergency rooms, undercut the wages of the real "working people" and threaten to Balkanize this country ethnically, linguistically, economically and socially.
Wake up.
If some Republicans insist on unreasonably attacking their own by persisting in the feverish pursuit of numerically impossible goals - i.e., getting every single illegal hispanic out of the U. S. - then the Democrats will indeed take over, with the result that the flood gates will be taken off their hinges and there will be no gates.
You will see a flood of illegals that can not even be imagined.
Push the Republicans to be tough. Build walls in Arizona and California. But to have a 100 percent illegal-alien removal program, you would have endless chaos even with the U. S. armed forces involved - and there would be a fatal turning aside from the huge Islamo-Fascist threat which involves WMD's.
Who, precisely, are our allies? Please identify the Iraqi, Filippino or Malian Churchill. To paraphrase Bismarck: we have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies, we only have permanent interests.
These people have been fighting each other for hundreds of years, in terms of Islam, and thousands of years in terms of tribalism. Do we really need to get into the middle of their disputes? Do we really need to ally ourselves with narco-sheikhs in Afghanistan or closet Iranian supporters in Iraq? I think not.
The so-called "Blood for Oil," in my mind, represents a legitimate American interest. If these people cut off our oil, our economy dies and our way of life is affected. Protecting our interest in Middle East oil, in my mind, is our only interest in that region until we develop alternate sources of energy, at which point we can tell the savages who populate that region to go bleep themselves.
So when the moonbats scream "No blood for oil," I say: "Stop driving your Volvo/Saab/Mercedes with the 2 year old 'Kerry/Edwards' bumper sticker on the back, you idiot, and start walking so I can drive to work and pay my taxes."
Exactly!
If this gift to illegal aliens becomes law, there will be no amnesty for the Republican Party.
BumPing!!!
If these are the best negotiators that the Republican Senate can come up with, why bother?
There's little or no difference between the parties with people like these determining what laws are passed.
Constitution party for me. Screw the republicrats.
Are you under the impression that you will be doing anything other than handing control of this country over to the Democrats? I do not want the party that gave us the Vietnamese Boat People, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Sandinista's to regain control of the government.
ROFL
Do you have ANY idea how often I've heard that argument???
Let me say it plainly: I DON'T CARE! THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THESE TWO PARTIES!
What's not to understand???
Dems are liars, cheats and thieves and Repubs are liars, cheats and gutless.
You may see a difference here, I don't.
Also, we in CA would like Prop 187 which was passed by close to 67% in this most blue of blue states 12yrs agao, ENACTED WITHOUT DELAY!
Filthy Judges who overthrow the will of the people must be impeached.
I'm keeping an eye on my senators and reps, if they vote for this travesty, I vote against them.
Of course my house rep is the esteemed Cynthia McKinney so I already planned on voting against her.
That is a GREAT quote. It is potential tag material.
Pop quiz... from a conservatives 'pro border enforcement' point of view, which alternative is more likely to produce the desired legislative result in congress?
a. sit on hands, allow loudmouthed protestors in the streets waving mexican flags dictate the tone of the debate, or:
b. convince the GOP they will lose their jobs in November if they do not act on the will of their base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.