Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
Posted on 04/04/2006 8:45:07 AM PDT by jveritas
Edited on 04/04/2006 7:29:49 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Pages 186 and 193 of document BIAP 2003 00090 carry one of the most important information revealed so far regarding Saddam Nuclear Program. In these two pages which document a summary of meetings held by members of The Military Office of the Iraqi Baath Party and dated May/12/2002 and June/9/2002 they have a section that discuss Saddam Hussein meeting with the Chairman of the Atomic Energy and an elite of researchers.
I first thought that this may be a reference to a meeting between Saddam and the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) so I called both of IAEA offices in New York and Vienna to check if Saddam had any meeting with the IAEA Chairman prior to May 2002, and they indicated to me that they do not recall any such meeting of IAEA chairman and Saddam prior to May 2002.
What is also important is that President Bush in a speech dated October 7 2002 mentioned that Saddam has held numerous meetings with his nuclear Scientists and I quote from President Bush “The evidence indicates that Iraq is reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Saddam Hussein has held numerous meetings with Iraqi nuclear scientists, a group he calls his "nuclear mujahideen" -- his nuclear holy warriors” (see: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html ).
So this document shows that it is true that in 2002 Saddam still has an active nuclear program if he still has a Chairman of the Atomic Energy Group and a group of Nuclear Scientists.
I will do a partial translation of page 186 and 194.
Beginning of the Partial translation of Page 186
In the Name of God the Merciful the Compassionate
The Baath Arabic Socialist Party
The Military Office
Subject: The report of the meeting of the cell members
Comradely Salute
At exactly the hour (13:00) on Sunday 12/5/2002 the committee of the cell of members held its scheduled meeting as follow:
5. The political side: The discussion of the comrade the Leader Saddam Hussein (God protect him) during the meeting of his Excellency with the Chairman of the Atomic Energy and an elite of researchers.
End of partial translation of Page 186.
Beginning of Partial translation of Page 194
In the Name of God the Merciful the Compassionate
The Baath Arabic Socialist Party
The Military Office
Subject: The report of the meeting of the cell members
Comradely Salute
At exactly the hour (13:00) on Sunday 9/6/2002 the committee of the cell of members held its scheduled meeting as follow:
5. The political side: The discussion of the comrade the Leader Saddam Hussein (God protect him) during the meeting of his Excellency meeting with the Chairman of the Atomic Energy Organization and a number of researchers.
Oh yeah, and if you pay Scott enough he'll say whatever you instruct him to say ... Saddam proved it!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
Thank you, thank you for all the work you are doing. The evil MSM is trying as hard as possible to bury all this, but good people here and others are trying just as hard to get this all out. In the end,I believe the good will prevail!
Although I'm sure many of them have their heads firmly planted in the sand (or elswhere), all the libs who screamed that BUSH LIED!! are shaking their sorry melons in astonishment and fervently praying to God, the ones who believe in God, that these documents are forgeries. All several hundred thousand of them. Because they vindicate everything Bush has said about Hussein. Sorry libs, the documents are real. There is no right-wing Dan Rather.
Howdy G!
You welcome Bush Gal. The truth will always come out :)
Thank you for the time you take to translate and then send the information on to us. It is greatly appreciated.
Anytime :)
Thank you for this important work.
Good find. I've got it linked here.
Bio-Chemical Weapons & Saddam: A History.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/848341/posts
Let me also add my thanks for all the work you are doing on this. Everyday I am checking to see if you have posted anything more. It's almost as exciting as watching 24!
Thank you my fellow freepers.
David Frum: On Second Thought, I Didn't Coin "Axis of Evil"
More interesting than whether Frum jumped or was pushed is Frum's assertion to John Ibbitson in the Feb. 26 Toronto Globe and Mail that the phrase he coined was not "axis of evil," but "axis of hate," and that someone changed "hate" to "evil." In a Feb. 10 column, Novak reported that it was White House chief speechwriter Michael Gerson who made the change. That would lend credence to Time magazine's version of events, which is that Frum and Gerson coined "axis of evil." In the Globe and Mail interview, Frum now says, "I think it was actually the president" who scratched out "hate" and scribbled in "evil."
How I created the axis of evil
The phrase Frum comes up with is "axis of hatred", describing the ominous but ill-defined links between Iraq and terrorism. It is Gerson who tweaks the phrase into the "axis of evil", to make it sound more "theological".
"I thought that was terrific," Frum says. "It was the sort of language President Bush used."
In the second link it states that bush fashioned a new enemy for America.
I will never understand how people can buy into something like that. These enemies existed long before W took office and to assert he fashioned (read: fabricated) a new enemy is simply revisionist history with a twist of bush hate.
I sure am glad that more and more docs are trickling out that are creating a pile so high that not even Hans Blix or Scott Ritter could possibly believe the crap they have said over the last few years.
Thanks for the links.
MSM....ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZ
We are proud to have you as an American brother!
Thanks!!
Outstanding work! Thank you, thank you, thank you and keep up the great work!
Crazy? No you are not but you are wrong. Israel would strike back at all the states you just mentioned. ALL OF THEM, even if they are not sure that all were involved. What worries me is the crazies in Iran. Such an outcome may be their scenario for the second coming of their Savior in their twisted view of their religion. That is scary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.