Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/02/2006 8:09:47 AM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Flavius

2 posted on 04/02/2006 8:10:48 AM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

So this is what they meant by a radar evading missile.


3 posted on 04/02/2006 8:11:42 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Just a few days after their 'earthquake' eh?


6 posted on 04/02/2006 8:16:03 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Peaceful missile tests, no doubt.


7 posted on 04/02/2006 8:16:16 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
just in, photo of the famous missle
8 posted on 04/02/2006 8:22:36 AM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
The Russians are starting to piss me off.

Iran delinda est.

9 posted on 04/02/2006 8:22:51 AM PDT by patton (Once you steal a firetruck, there's really not much else you can do except go for a joyride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
just in, photo of the famous missle
10 posted on 04/02/2006 8:22:57 AM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Do we really think the Iranians have developed a Skval torpedo or that the Russians have sold them one of their most modern weapon systems?

Sounds very unlikley to me, but we'll see if this will be confirmed.


11 posted on 04/02/2006 8:23:30 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
"The Iranian Russian-made missile has a speed of 223 mph underwater "

Thank you Russia, can't wait for Iran to give the Checnens a nuke or too.

12 posted on 04/02/2006 8:23:58 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius; Doohickey; judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; Bottom_Gun; ...

High-speed underwater missile ping


13 posted on 04/02/2006 8:25:24 AM PDT by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

RELATED LINK:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1607847/posts


15 posted on 04/02/2006 9:03:05 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

17 posted on 04/02/2006 9:09:59 AM PDT by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Yaaaaawwwwwwwnnnnn! The Soviet Union made such claims just before it's demise of an underwater torpedo capable of those speeds. Sounds like stolen or "bought" Old Soviet technology. And the hand wringers think that there hasn't been a counter measure because the MSM hasn't been told about it. Remember the surprise everyone got when we found out that the F-114 Stealth fighter not only was a reality but had been operational for 10 years?
25 posted on 04/02/2006 9:54:52 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

This qualifies for preemptive action since Iran is incapable of possessing weapons of this nature and worse without launching them at anyone who looks at them cross-eyed. Extortion's fun at first, but the thrill soon palls, and they'll take out a US aircraft carrier and Israel...just for the heck of it. We can't let that happen.


27 posted on 04/02/2006 10:02:09 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
solid-rocket propelled "torpedo" achieves high speeds by producing a high-pressure stream of bubbles from its nose and skin, which coats the torpedo in a thin layer of gas and forms a local "envelope" of supercavitating bubbles. Carrying a tactical nuclear warhead initiated by a timer, it would destroy the hostile submarine and the torpedo it fired. The Shkval high-speed underwater missile is guided by an auto-pilot rather than by a homing head as on most torpedoes.

There are no evident countermeasures to such a weapon

When in supervcavitation, the Shkval is guided not too differently from WWI era torpedoes plus, it makes one hell of a noise. Conventional anti-torpedo torpedoes could and probably have been modified to proceed to a point where an improved Shkval is expected to slow down from supercavitation in order to "take a look around" That's where they should be able to get it.

Another possibility is to draw on the WWII era Hedgehogs. A lot of bomblets, fired into the Shkvals path may do the trick.

In the meantime, ASW teams should have a pretty good idea where to look for the enemy sub.

32 posted on 04/02/2006 10:12:23 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Ping!


37 posted on 04/02/2006 10:47:33 AM PDT by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - There's no problem on the inside of a person that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stevie_d_64

Ping!


42 posted on 04/02/2006 11:03:27 AM PDT by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - There's no problem on the inside of a person that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius; Doohickey; Cyber Liberty
They talk about this kind of missile - almost certainly a specific dupe of the old Soviet technology - as if it were to be only used against subs ....

But Iran can't track our subs,

But Iran doesn't need to track our subs (since they aren't logically going to be wedged into the little confined spaces and shallow water and INCREDIBLY complex sonar traffic of the straits and bays near Iran,

But Iran doesn't NEED to track (or attack) or subs, since Iran has no targets that our subs NEED to track.

And Iran (or the Soviet Union) cannot easily target subs with these high speed missiles since there is no way to provide terminal guidance and mid-course guidance against a maneuvering sub.

BUT ...

All of those are perfectly valid reasons to attack the many US SURFACE ships crossing the Strait and laying off of her waters easily found and tracked by surface binoculars and radars, so THOSE ships can be tracked, targeted, and attacked by high-speed underwater rockets.

Sure, torpedoes haven't been shot at surface ships recently, but every terminal defense and anti-missile defense now carried is USELESS against high-speed torpedoes.
43 posted on 04/02/2006 11:04:40 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

bttt


60 posted on 04/02/2006 11:40:03 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius; Cindy; Godzilla; HipShot; All
FOX is currently running video of such a test. Not sure if the video is Russian or not but the subheadings or crawl are clearly of a middle eastern origin. Gives this a little more credibility.
74 posted on 04/02/2006 12:43:54 PM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson