Skip to comments.
Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone (most potent greenhouse gas is H2O)
Space and Earth Science ^
| March 14, 2006
| University of Leicester
Posted on 03/28/2006 5:52:41 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Water vapour levels are even less within our control than CO2 levels. Obviously, tackling this problem will cost even more than we thought [/sarcasm]
2
posted on
03/28/2006 5:55:30 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Never question Bruce Dickinson!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
We must eradicate all water from the planet immediately or we will all fry!
3
posted on
03/28/2006 5:56:10 AM PST
by
Wil H
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Dihydrogen Monoxide causes global warming!? OMG! Run for the hills!
5
posted on
03/28/2006 5:56:30 AM PST
by
rarestia
("One man with a gun can control 100 without one." - Lenin / Molwn Labe!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"According to Shaidurov, only small changes in the atmospheric levels of water, in the form of vapour and ice crystals can contribute to significant changes to the temperature of the earth's surface, which far outweighs the effects of carbon dioxide and other gases released by human activities. Just a rise of 1% of water vapour could raise the global average temperature of Earth's surface more then 4 degrees Celsius."
6
posted on
03/28/2006 5:58:49 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It sure makes more sense than the fossil fool theory. There were no fossil fuels burning back in the 13th? century when we went through the last temp rise. There are more trees in the USA today than when our Columbus discovered this place. Trees put H2O into the air. Makes more sense than the bearded smelly wackos goofy theory's.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
8
posted on
03/28/2006 6:02:39 AM PST
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is dumb, Everyone know that global warming is caused by Fox News and Republicans.
9
posted on
03/28/2006 6:03:02 AM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Remember 9/11. The left have already forgotten.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"the apparent rise in average global"
Apparent to whom? Not to anyone smarter then an M&M.
GW is a politicial idology not a science.
10
posted on
03/28/2006 6:04:15 AM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Notice, we never had global warming problems until everyone started drinking all that bottled water. Now they're all sweating and raising the temperatures and ruining the earth.
11
posted on
03/28/2006 6:06:05 AM PST
by
tiki
To: edcoil
GW is a politicial idology not a science. Did you RTFA?
12
posted on
03/28/2006 6:06:24 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
Ping
Thought it might interest you.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
They are finally talking about water vapor. Carbon dioxide is nothing compared to it.
Plus the water vapor rises more easily than CO2. A moloecule with two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom is considerebly lighter than O2 or N2 (oxygen and nitrogen respectively) and its part of the reason why moisture laden air rises and convection works. (heat transfer is the other part of it).
Water also has a high specific heat, meaning it can hold more thermal energy, per unit of its weight. That's why our oceans make such a good heat sink. Water can absorb heat without its own temperature rising as much as most other substances, due to its hydrogen bonds.
14
posted on
03/28/2006 6:09:21 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(If you can't make a mistake, you can't make anything.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This study is sure to be ignored and its author's reputation smeared. Too many paychecks depend on the fossil-fuel-is-evil theory.
15
posted on
03/28/2006 6:14:33 AM PST
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: ClearCase_guy
Water vapour levels are even less within our control than CO2 levels.Bingo. That's why the 'global warming' liberals have been avoiding the subject. As long as CO2 can be nade the culprit, it was possible to connect it to mankind and industry....the two biggest enemies of liberalism.
They wanted to get control over energy, and thus have control over virtually all of man's activities. That's why people like George Soros et al sunk so much money into research grants paying scientists to reach foregone conclusions about global warming and ignoring all else.
Why else would they feel the need to realease another global warming scare story every few days?
16
posted on
03/28/2006 6:17:10 AM PST
by
capt. norm
(If you can't make a mistake, you can't make anything.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"The event released as much energy as fifteen one-megaton atomic bombs."Or one fifteen megaton bomb?
What kind of doofus wrote this piece of drivel?
17
posted on
03/28/2006 6:24:35 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Shaidurov has concluded that only an enormous natural phenomenon, such as an asteroid or comet impact or airburst, could seriously disturb atmospheric water levels, destroying persistent so-called 'silver', or noctilucent, clouds composed of ice crystals in the high altitude mesosphere (50 to 85km). Sheesh.
While the author of the article discusses global warming caused by greenhouse gases (including H2O), Shaidurov's theory has little to do with greenhouses gases.
I know this just gets in the way of a good rant about the greenhouse gas theory of global warming -- rant away.
18
posted on
03/28/2006 6:26:23 AM PST
by
delacoert
(imperat animus corpori, et paretur statim: imperat animus sibi, et resistitur. -AUGUSTINI)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The simple expansion of irrigation on a massive scale, worldwide, plus building tens of thousands of golf courses with super-duper greens control systems, could explain everything.
The solution?
19
posted on
03/28/2006 6:38:35 AM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It Is all a LIE!
20
posted on
03/28/2006 6:39:53 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson