A Mysterious Death at The Hague

The Chronicles Magazine ^ | 24 Mar 2006 | Srdja Trifkovic

[A. Pole]

[nuconvert]

"now we are not going to hear the Milosevic’s story but only the media spin"

I see.
Tell Srdja Trifkovic that unlike him, we're glad Milosevic is gone. I don't really care how it happened.

[Red6]

An article written by: Srdja Trifkovic

That’s a Serb sounding name?

And he’s writing a story about a conspiracy to cover up mass murder that he writes off as “clichés”. This guy’s premise of the story is that the genocide taking place never happened or was somehow standard procedure.

Unbelievable-

The story is trash. This is a revisionist interpretation of history that victimizes a villain.

[joan]

"I don't really care how it happened."

Then go post on other threads which you are interested. This is for people who are interested and inquisitive.

[dennisw]

bttt

[nuconvert]

see post #4.
I will be leaving, because I have no interest in what a Milosevic sympathizer has to say, since it will not be the true story.
Feel free to stay and be interested.

[joan]

"I will be leaving"

Good riddance to you.

[theDentist]

Perhaps someone did get to him and end that unfortunate existence. That's fine with me. Sending people to trial in The Hague is like sending the UN to stop a war in Africa. They were dragging their feet. The trial was going on for 5 years and still was nowhere close to ending. No wonder Saddam and his lawyers wanted to move his trial to there. Heck, I hope someone did do the dirty so-and-so in.

[nuconvert]

Have a nice day!

[thoughtomator]

Kind of odd, considering how willingly you accepted the UN's version of events. The UN has at least as much blood on its hands (far more, really) and is far more dangerous to us than Milosevic ever could have been. With means, motive, and opportunity so clearly present, why discount, on account of mere prejudice, the likelihood that Milosevic was murdered by the UN?

[joan]

Can't you keep to your word and just go away?

I don't go around posting "I am not interested in this article" on threads or topics. I simply don't click on them or don't say anything.

I'd would be ever so glad to never read another post from you. There should be enough threads to keep you interested in on a forum as big as FR.

[infidel_and_proud]

So you say you're leaving, then not only hang around, but also post something.

A bit of a ditherer aren't we.

[A. Pole]

To: nuconvert
Can't you keep to your word and just go away? I don't go around posting "I am not interested in this article" on threads or topics. I simply don't click on them or don't say anything.

He is VERY interested in the article. He just does not have any good arguments to support his position so he produces infantile and inane retorts.

[infidel_and_proud]

So, where's your evidence that "genocide" took place?

Yes, that four letter word beginning with an "F".

FACT and preferably in the plural, please.

It's interesting that there are so many people here defending the ICTY and the U.N.

I thought that "FreeRepublic" was a CONSERVATIVE talk board.

[infidel_and_proud]

SPOT ON

[SQUID]

Trifkovic, if you actually knew him, never liked Milosevic.

[RoadTest]

The Kangaroo says it all. Thank you for posting that picture.

[wildandcrazyrussian]

Well, there never has been any genocide in the former Yugoslavia except for that committed against the Serbs by the Nazi-allied Croatian Ustashe and the Nazi-allied Muslims during World War II, in which 1,000,000 pro-Western Serbs were massacred. Any claims (which are just repeats of a figure made up out of thin air by the al-Qaeda-allied Islamics in Bosnia) that 250,000 Muslism were killed in Bosnia, as just one example, is just wartime propaganda by pathological liars, and as recognized by such non-Serbian people as General Nambia of India, Ambassador Bissett of Canada, General Mackenzie, and Mr. Kenney of the US State Department.

I am glad that FreeRepublic exists as a forum in which the actual truth about things can be expressed and examined, unlike all the sources you seem to prefer.

[SQUID]

It's interesting that there are so many people here defending the ICTY and the U.N.

Yet at the same time lots of folks hate and don't recognize either one.

The United States would never send a president to the Hague even if he dropped a nuke on Paris because the US government does not recognize the legitimacy of the court. The court proceedings are far from standard court proceedings here in the US.

Some folks in here shouldn't bother writing about this because clearly they just regurgitate the crap that CNN and FOX salted their brain with. Nobody does research anymore. Nobody reads. Yet they defend "their" position so adamantly. Lots of folks never left their from yard and yet they are international law experts.