He is VERY interested in the article. He just does not have any good arguments to support his position so he produces infantile and inane retorts.
SPOT ON
"He just does not have any good arguments to support his position"
Actually, I don't have a position on how he died.
As I said, I thought I might get an unbiased report. This isn't.
My only position is, I'm glad he's dead no matter how it happened.