Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts...
Jim Robinson

Posted on 03/22/2006 8:58:42 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Edited on 03/23/2006 2:06:21 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

Re: Your attempt to shut down political free speech on the Internet

John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts to find even one thread, one post, one paragraph, one sentence or even one lousy word posted to this web site that is not fully protected by the First Amendment!

And I will extend that to one chapter, one group, one poster or any group of posters on this forum. Name one assembly, petition, letter, protest, meeting or rally convened, filed, submitted, attended or supported by members of this forum that is not 100% protected and guaranteed as free speech or free assembly by the First Amendment!

Your McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation is a treasonous act. You and your cohorts are attempting to subvert the Constitution of the United States of America, the very same constitution that you swore an oath to defend, so help you God! That makes you a domestic enemy of that great document and a traitor to your country. Yes, and Benedict Arnold was a war hero before he turned traitor too.

How dare you even think that you are qualified to sit in the oval office! Ronald Reagan's office! President? Hah! You miserable excuse for a two-bit political hack, you're not even qualified to shine Ronald Reagan's boots. If you do run, I'm afraid you're gonna be at least one vote short. It'll be a cold day in hell before a traitor like you ever receives my vote. And that's a campaign promise you can take to the bank.

You can take your fascist campaign finance laws and the jackbooted FEC anti-free-speech enforcers you are empowering and put them where the sun don't shine. And if this post is in violation of your unconstitutional law, shove it too!


Paraphrased from In the Face of Evil: Reagan's War in Word and Deed:

The Beast never dies, it simply changes form. The Beast has known many forms: Bolshevism, communism, Nazism, fascism. The Beast has had many names: Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Tojo, Mao, Pol Pot.

The Beast cannot co-exist with freedom. The very first freedom lost is the freedom of speech, then religion, knowledge and the arts. Anything that empowers the individual must be destroyed. The state must control all.

Power to the state.

Power as an end to itself.

Those who speak out against the Beast are labeled extremists, radicals, warmongers. Churchill, McCarthy, Reagan.

The Beast must be contained, appeased. We must have "Detente" at any cost. Direct confrontation of the Beast must be avoided.

Appease him and pray the wolf may pass our door.

Free speech must die.

The Beast never dies.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; 2008; amnesty; anyonebutmccain; billofrights; bloggers; bolleskempermarley; booleskempermarley; buyammo; cfr; congress; constitutionlist; election; elections; fec; fred; fredthompson; freespeech; goldwater; govwatch; immigrantlist; jackbootedthugs; jbt; jimrobrant; johnmccain; juanmccain; libertarians; mccain; mccainfascist; mccainfeingold; mccainlist; mccainneverprez; mccaintruthfile; mccainunfit; mctraitor; nofred4prez; nowaymccain; president; puppetmasters; rinomccain; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,461-1,464 next last
To: Howlin
The chilling effect of a regulatory scheme would be exacerbated by its arbitrariness--for example, the FEC trying to determine on a case-by-case basis which bloggers should be considered `news' organizations and be granted a media exemption and be taken out of the realm of regulated organizations, and which should not. This arbitrariness would negatively impact bloggers in particular because their sites often meld news and advocacy.

If you have a web site, even as a private citizen, and release information that shows the people what hildabeast is really like, I believe it would fall under the category of news-advocacy. If it became a popular site, it would draw the attention of the FCC and you would be closed.

This whole thing reeks of Communism. Trying to do away with our free speech. Hell, they already screwed us on imminent domain.

461 posted on 03/22/2006 11:01:23 PM PST by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker


NO sale here.

Appointments to the federal bench negate ALL democrats.


462 posted on 03/22/2006 11:02:42 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Sundog
Have you seen this:(in 2 parts)


SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO"

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd59.htm

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd60.htm
463 posted on 03/22/2006 11:02:52 PM PST by AmeriBrit (A must see: http://www.iraqitruthproject.com/flash2.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Smartass
Whoops, forgot the smilie...
464 posted on 03/22/2006 11:03:11 PM PST by antceecee (Reagan Democrat and now a Bush Republican...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Precisely. Hillary the disciple of Marxist, Saul Alinsky.


465 posted on 03/22/2006 11:03:34 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: onyx; TAdams8591
Appointments to the federal bench negate ALL democrats.

Amen, sister!

That and the Electoral College do it for me.

466 posted on 03/22/2006 11:04:28 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I pray you are right.


467 posted on 03/22/2006 11:04:31 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

I disagree.


468 posted on 03/22/2006 11:05:46 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Who'd he come to town to support? :(


469 posted on 03/22/2006 11:05:52 PM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; risk


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1317039/posts?page=29#29

To: Ooh-Ah
She's holding back. She's leading up to the right moment to reintroduce the idea of abandoning the Electoral College. The Democrats can't get the whitehouse back unless they gerrymander our election system. So that they'll try to do.

29 posted on 01/09/2005 4:09:10 AM EST by risk


470 posted on 03/22/2006 11:06:11 PM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Rabble


Hillary and Bill are from "within."


471 posted on 03/22/2006 11:06:19 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

So does this mean that the DUmmie Funnies I was laughing at today actually had a point? Oh Lordy! Please tell me NO!!!!!


472 posted on 03/22/2006 11:07:02 PM PST by Conservative Texan Mom (Some people say I'm stubborn, when it's really just that I'm right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

You don't have to agree.

You just need to acknowledge reality.

The reality is that I am not alone in this thought, nor is it an insignificant number that hold this view.

If McCain is nominated a large number are going to refuse to support him. Probably enough to throw the race to the Dem, unlike McCain I don't believe the MSM will have his back in a presidential race. It was done in '92 and it was done in '96. And, imo, 41 and Dole were at least decent men. A quality that led me to support them even with vast disagreements on policy. McCain is not a man of character, and I will not support him under any circumstance because of it.

A vote for McCain is a vote for Hillary by default. If folks really want to test conservatives resolve on this...then people will learn the hard way.

But, luckily for them, I think conservatives are going to band together to destroy Mccain so that doesn't happen.


473 posted on 03/22/2006 11:07:35 PM PST by Soul Seeker ("The Republican Party is now principally moderate, if not liberal!" Arlen Specter (R-Pa))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Whenever I hear or see John McCain-or come across his name in the news-I can't help but hear the lyrics to In The Jailhouse Now.
474 posted on 03/22/2006 11:07:43 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: onyx

yes, more O'Connor's will do wonders on the bench. :-)


475 posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:09 PM PST by Soul Seeker ("The Republican Party is now principally moderate, if not liberal!" Arlen Specter (R-Pa))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Hillary Clinton of New York wants to abolish the Electoral College. On November 9 she told reporters"

WOW!!! LOOk at that! Where did you find it (and so quickly)?

Hillary would be far more dangerous than McCain. They're not even in the same ballpark!

476 posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:29 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Only STUPID ones would vote third party and hand over the White House to the Democrats."

The stupid ones handed it over to Clinton the last time we ran an a$$ hole...

If the base is not motivated to vote, the rats will win. You don't gave to like it Howlin, but that's the way it will come down.
477 posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:31 PM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Absolutely.

Without the Electoral College -- it's democrat control forever.


478 posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:38 PM PST by onyx (Bush/Cheney '08 --- by coup if necessary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: claptrap
Even Rush ... thought this was good

Absolutely NOT.

479 posted on 03/22/2006 11:08:54 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

"Bookmarks, we've got bookmarks, we've got stacks and stacks of bookmarks."

(You, of course, are too young to get the "funniest" part of that little ditty.)


480 posted on 03/22/2006 11:09:06 PM PST by Howlin ("It doesn't have a policy. It doesn't need to have a policy. What's the point of a Democratic policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,461-1,464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson