Posted on 03/13/2006 2:20:24 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Feingold Draws Little Support for Censure
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 18 minutes ago
Democrats distanced themselves Monday from Wisconsin Sen. Russell Feingold's effort to censure President Bush over domestic spying.
The White House hit back at the same time, Vice President Dick Cheney telling a fundraiser in Feingold's home state that the resolution was an "outrageous proposition."
As the crowd in De Pere, Wis., booed Feingold's effort, Cheney said, "Don't hold back."
Feingold's fellow Democrats did just that Monday, with several saying they wanted first to see the Senate Intelligence Committee finish an investigation of the warrantless wiretapping program that Bush authorized as part of his war on terrorism.
Asked at a news conference whether he would vote for the censure resolution, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada declined to endorse it and said he hadn't read it.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., said he had not read it either and wasn't inclined simply to scold the president.
"I'd prefer to see us solve the problem," Lieberman told reporters.
Across the Capitol, reaction was similar. Feingold's resolution drew empathy but no outright support from Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
I would LOVE to see Dodd or Morris ride a bike for 2 hours!!!
I KNOW, that is not what they meant by lazy...but, just like today..Bush gave a speech at George Washington University...and Matthews was covering the dang STRAW POLL from Memphis last weekend...and of course Feingold.
Morris makes me sick...but he goes on all of the shows..
"So Feingold brings it up, Senator Frist calls for Unanimous Consent to VOTE on it, and Reid has to object to having a vote, because they don't actually want to vote on it."
If the Democrats don't want to vote on it, they can get Feingold to withdraw it. It's not necessary to play a cheesy political game.
Didn't we find under clinton that there is no such thing as a censure of the President - it is not Consitutional.
What is this idiot speaking of now.
I agree totally with you, which leads me to ask a question that I am always puzzled about, but have yet to see answered.
I agree that McCain-Feingold is a clear violation of the 1st amendment freedom of speech rights. So if that is so obvious, why hasn't this been challenged in court and I would think that even a liberal-activist SCOTUS would throw McCain-Feingold out like yesterday's trash. Why hasn't that happened yet? It seems like this would have been challenged successfully in court the moment Pres Bush (go figure that one out) broke his 2000 campaign promise and signed this aberration into law.
All I can say is I am baffled. SCOTUS did not throw the law out when it was challenged. Hopefully it will be challenged. You would think the ACLU would go crazy over it. Their silence is deafening.
Thankfully, I missed Dick Morris. It's rare that I watch anything political at night; if I do, I don't sleep well. LOL
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
What a great election ad. If he is afraid to face his colleagues in the Senate, how will he face the terrorists.
"Take this brother, may it serve you well!"
McConnell v. Federal Election Comm'n, 540 US 93 (2003) http://supreme.usatoday.findlaw.com/supreme_court/docket/2003/september.html#1674
President Bush should announce that if the Republicans retain solid control of both Houses of Congress in 2006, he will ask for the resignation of Vice President Cheney after Election Day, but if the Democrats gain control in either House, he will have to retain Vice President Cheney in order to defend against the expected attacks from Congress.
Then the Democrat voter will have to decide. Does he pull the (D) for Congresscritter on the hope that maybe they will be able to pull off a miracle upset and impeach the President, or does he pull the (R) and go for the sure thing and fire Cheney?
My observations over recent years tells me that hate will win out over hope with these voters, and they will vote to fire Cheney, because they want somebody to get the axe, and Cheney's head would look pretty nice mounted on a trophy.
Somewhere I read that Feingold did withdraw it. Then Spector and someone else tried to get him to debate it, but he supposedly refused to return to the floor.
If I were Cheney I'd be miffed at being used as a pawn.
In response to your post #29 to me yesterday...
I don't believe there's any doubt the Dim strategy has been to negatively influence public opinion against the president. That hasn't been only the Dim strategy but that of the MSM as well.
While I agree the administration and Congress both have spent far too much time on defense, it's not an either/or situation. Yes, the GOP should have spent far more capital offensively, however one has to respond to certain negative press at times.
What's really hurt, I believe, is the abysmal reaction to such events as Katrina, the Supreme Court nominations, the ports issue, and possibly most of all, the economy. The administration has not had an effective public relations agenda.
Now we're coming to mid-term elections and everyone is looking over their shoulders. Sheeesh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.