Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We could take out Iran N-sites: Israeli general
The Australian ^ | March 11, 2006 | Abraham Rabinovich

Posted on 03/10/2006 8:08:17 PM PST by Flavius

GENERAL Moshe Ya'alon, a former chief of staff of the Israel Defence Forces, has revealed that Israel could neutralise the Iranian threat for several years by hitting dozens of targets spread around the country.

General Ya'alon told the Hudson Institute in Washington on Thursday that the Iranian sites could be struck with greater accuracy than was achieved by the air force in its frequent "targeted assassinations" of Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip.

His remarks, the most explicit yet about Israel's capacity to strike at Iran's nuclear sites, drew sharp criticism from officials in Israel who have been attempting to maintain a low profile on the issue in order to leave it as a matter for the international community.

"You don't talk about these things in public," said a senior official, "particularly when there are journalists present."

The general's comments came as Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that if his Kadima party won this month's national elections, he would aim to establish the country's final borders with the Palestinian Authority within four years.

Although Mr Olmert expressed a readiness to negotiate these borders with a Hamas government if it recognised Israel and disavowed violence, he indicated that this was not likely to happen. The new borders would then be set unilaterally by Israel.

Mr Olmert said for the first time that the security barrier being built on the West Bank parallel to the pre-Six Day War boundary would serve as the new border, although its alignment might be shifted in places - either deeper into the West Bank or closer to Israel.

In Washington, General Ya'alon noted that unlike Palestinian targets, which were generally travelling in vehicles, nuclear sites were stationary.

He added that the job could also be done by means other than an air force attack, an apparent reference to missiles.

"It would be preferable for other nations to do the job," he was quoted as saying, "but you can't rule out Israel."

The retired general said the Iranians could complete their know-how on building a nuclear device within the next six to 18 months and could build one within three to six years.

A sharp counter-strike against Israel could be expected, General Ya'alon said, including the launching of missiles from Iran and action by the Hezbollah militia in Lebanon, who have been provided by Iran with 12,000 rockets capable of hitting up to 80km inside Israel.

He said that Israel's Arrow anti-missile missile was fully deployed and capable of intercepting the Iranian missiles.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; israel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Supernatural
AMEN !!

Your absolutely correct.
41 posted on 03/11/2006 12:01:57 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
It's the mad mullahs , their leadership who hate America, but, the average person ( for the most part ) is actually pro-America, but, you won't know it from face value.

I agree completely. I was in college just before and during the takeover, and had proud Persians seated on each side of me in a Political Science class. Great guys, both of them, left stranded by the upheaval. They were "into" their political scene, and we talked a lot about it.

I was in touch with one of them briefly a year ago, and he's involved with things happening within Iran, and excited about them.

Would you proclaim your pro-America -pro-west if you had the Mullahs as your government and lived in Iran ?

No way, until things came to a head with a chance of success. It's a very tightly-controlled regime down to the neighborhoods, not a nice place to be if you long for freedom.

42 posted on 03/11/2006 12:09:39 AM PST by umbagi (Monthly Donor [entry level])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Flavius; All
Old, but of interest:

The Samson Option-- what is known about Israel's Nuclear Weapons?

U.S. Air Force: Israel has 400 nukes, building naval force

The latter report is illuminating, given that it is 4 years old, and the most commonly-quoted number of Israeli warheads is 200... wonder how many they really have?

43 posted on 03/11/2006 2:01:29 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

agree 100% You cannot negotiate with an enemy commited to wiping you off the planet. This talk with the UN/EU/IAEA is only buying them time to complete their bomb. The cost of action is far less than the cost on inaction.


44 posted on 03/11/2006 2:16:13 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness
It's the mad mullahs , their leadership who hate America, but, the average person ( for the most part ) is actually pro-America, but, you won't know it from face value.

I would agree to a certain extent, at least with one particular fellow I know personally...

He came to the USA from Iran as a small boy with his parents. As a young teenager, he ran away to avoid returning to Iran with them. He wears pointy boots, Stetson hats, chews, drives a GMC 4WD with rifle racks in the back window, likes that Texas honky-tonk rockabilly music and you would think he is a Mexican or Native American cowpoke if you got a look at him.

He told me to never trust the Islamics. The sight of a mosque makes him cringe and grit his teeth. When seeing it that day in his face as we drove past one in Detroit on the way to a hockey game, I asked. It was a ten minute rant from a usually quiet, unassuming fellow I will never forget. He seriously hates the religion...

45 posted on 03/11/2006 2:50:16 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The nuclear Popeye Turbo launched from Dolphin class are a myth. The whole myth was started with the story of Israeli Dolphin class subs testing with the Indian Navy. If you believe the stories then the two Israeli Dolphins at the time were in the Indian Ocean. They were actually still in port in Israel. It is a classic case of bogus rumors and stories getting out of hand. Consequently many individuals believe that Israeli Dolphin-class have this capability and can strike solely from the Med.


46 posted on 03/11/2006 7:55:37 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369
What do you think the likely hood is that Iran will be stopped? And who do you think will do it? US/ NATO/ Israel, NATO and Israel?

As long as the United States does not end up with a democrat President the probability of stopping Iran approaches a certainty.

As for who, it will be Israel and the U.S.; others may be permitted to join by invitation. The actual operation or operation may not be clearly attributable to any particular nation, service, methodology, weapon system, or device.

The actual mechanics of the operation by which Israel stopped Iraq's nuclear program may prove instructive.

Much has been made of the "impossibility of the task" on Free Republic and in the lame stream media. I lack Mark Steyn's ability to debunk that line of thought the way that Mark did "the brutal Afghan winters" but suffice it to say there was more truth about Afghan winters than about the invulnerabilities of the Iranian nuclear program. Keeping a nuclear weapons program going is a complex, risky enterprise with multiple points of failure. Even if we did nothing, the Iranians may be fighting a losing battle with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

I will admit that my analysis is colored by first hand experience with the response of the Iranian civil and military leadership to the election of President Reagan. The Three Stooges would have been more credible as civil leadership and the Keystone Cops would have been more credible as a military leadership.
47 posted on 03/11/2006 10:39:26 AM PST by Natty Bumppo@frontier.net (The facts of life are conservative -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

and Preditors and Global Hawks.


48 posted on 03/11/2006 12:59:47 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Well, actually, I meant the average Iranian citizen who is not mooslim.
I meet a few Persians here in the USA and they are the nicest people you would ever meet.
If the population were to be allowed to express their views and how they really feel in Iran, it would be like that gentleman who we all saw on ( LIVE TV ) in Baghdad who took that sledgehammer to Saddam's statue.
Where people don't realize it or not, around 500 BC is was the king of Persia who helped rebuild Jerusalem and who restored the religion of Judaism.
49 posted on 03/11/2006 11:31:34 PM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson