Posted on 03/07/2006 7:27:01 PM PST by MindBender26
Breaking Proven reliable sources tell me that in tomorrow morning's edition of the NYT, the leftist paper will reveal that DOD has embedded military rapid reaction teams at a number of US embassies abroad.
The Times is again giving our enemies hard intel they need to be more effective on the worldwide terrorism battlefield.
The concept was very simple; When we got intel that known terrs were operating in a specific area, the US team already in place would be able to snatch them quickly. Because the team is already there, entry problems would be eliminated and reaction time would be much faster. Terrs know how long it takes to get a Delta/SEAL/Snakeeater team out of US or forward area bases and into operational areas, so they know how long they can stay in an area themselves.
Under the new "pre-placement" plan, the reaction time was reduced from days to minutes.
I don't have full details yet, but sources believe not all countries where "pre-placed" teams are located knew they were there. In fact, majority of countries probably did not know small teams of our troops were ready to operate on their ground. Is assumed there were there under civilian cover or perhaps listed as part of the USMC security detachment.
The idea was simple. The snatches would be quick and quiet. Terrs would be removed to other country, possibly Guantanimo, often using business jets borrowed from legitimate US companies, and no one would ever know how or why they disappeared.
Now, thanks to NYT, all is blown!
Who the bloody hell is leaking to the damned SLIMES?
The Slimes is fighting back at the Justice Dept. They know the hammer is going to come down on them.
Sounds like this piece is still topical:
Introduction of XM-8 Assault Rifle Shelved Due to Inability to Target Journalists [HUMOR]
How can the NYT get away with this?
This is a time of war, why can't they be reeled in?
I read something the other day about polygraphing those in a position to leak.
GET TO IT.
One thing is for certain, most of the media (and Dems in general) want to disable Bush and our troops as much as possible so they can then claim the WOT is a failure, never mind the true cost.
Not that this information is earthshattering, It would be prudent to deploy hardline defenders in our embassys
The issue here is the Slimes willingness to tip the enemy off at every turn for a little press
The New York(DNC) Times has sided with our enemy long ago!!
Let's just write a book yearly on all our strategies, assets, and positions; and right before publishing it, the NYT would put it out first. Snakes.
"But it has drawn opposition from traditional intelligence agencies like the C.I.A., where some officials have viewed it as a provocative expansion into what has been their turf."
Ahhhhh, I wonder where this leak came from?
Great! Now the Times doesn't even need to say anything...
If that's all they publish, I don't see it as being that damaging either.
I suppose now congress will have to get involved and it will be 45 days...
THE I HATE BUSH TRAITORS AT THE CIA.
The inside source that revealed this info wanted it to be printed. If the NYT reporter didn't run the story, the inside man would go to another reporter with an "incredible" opportunity. THe blame must be put on the source not the reporter.
It's already published.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.