Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second F-22 sqaudron operational in Langley,VA
Yahoo.com ^

Posted on 03/06/2006 4:51:13 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME

March 3 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The 94th Fighter Squadron, famous for its historic "Hat in the Ring" insignia and legendary aviator Eddy Rickenbacker, began receiving F-22 Raptors from Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT - News) today. The two 5th Generation stealthy, air dominance fighters are assigned to the second operational squadron in the U.S. Air Force.

ADVERTISEMENT The two Raptors will join F-22s flying today as part of the 1st Fighter Wing's 27th Fighter Squadron at Langley Air Force Base, Va. Lockheed Martin has completed final assembly on 71 of the 107 fighters now on contract, and 63 have been delivered.

"This is another great milestone in the history of the F-22 Program," said Larry Lawson, Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President and F-22 Program General Manager. "The F-22 will dominate airspace anywhere around the globe, around the clock, and survive in contested airspace better than any other aircraft in the world.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: f22raptor; langleyafb; lockheedmartin; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: Hill of Tara
I thought the contract was for 277 Raptors, not 107.

Could be the difference between the number of 'authorized' aircraft and those actually funded to date.

21 posted on 03/06/2006 6:14:23 PM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
I'd still like to see an objective fly off. The way things really work, the F-22 was guaranteed a win. It had to as it's the latest and greatest.
22 posted on 03/06/2006 6:17:07 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
Was killing time in a library going through plenty aircraft books ( Janes and others ) and noticed that almost no aircraft we have bought ever had the full authorization produced. One third to one half is about normal.
23 posted on 03/06/2006 6:20:56 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Well if the Air Force had been thinking, they would have had the F-22 lose, thereby proving that they need more of them than what they're gonna get.


24 posted on 03/06/2006 6:23:36 PM PST by michaelt (</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

"183 is the number they are making initially. Then they have to go back to congress to ask for more. I really get sick of our politicians."

Yep, me too >:(

They need to get their heads out of their arses and realize how important having technologically advanced modern equipment is to winning wars. It's infuriating how stupid and shortsited a lot of these politicians are.

Some of them (RATS mostly) even wanted to kill the F/A-22 entirely. >:(

When was it reduced to 183 from 277?


25 posted on 03/06/2006 6:31:14 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Oh, now I see. That could be what the figure 107 refers to. Thanks.


26 posted on 03/06/2006 6:32:32 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog; Hill of Tara
You are not going to ever see a situation where one Raptor is alone against 20 enemy aircraft, all of them fighters.

I can image one scenario where this situation could possibly play out.

And that would be a Chinese mass assault on Taiwan.

A huge wave with a little of everything they have from Mig21's (out of the bone yard lightly loaded with guns and ground attack rockets) to the lasted and greatest fighters they have. ECM aircraft, Blinders and BackFires coming in supersonic on the waters deck, surface to surface missile assault and so on.

Call me an idiot if you want, but say why too. You cant absolutely deny such a scenario can you?

Wolf
27 posted on 03/06/2006 6:33:52 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

The fighter squads in Alaska are being phased out as the F-22s based in Washington come online. The F-22s can get to Alaska intercepts as quickly as having the present wings already in Alaska. Speed plus range plus vastly improved systems make that big a difference.


28 posted on 03/06/2006 6:38:50 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: michaelt

No. Then Congress would say you don't need a new plane if the old ones work just fine. That's the way it works.


29 posted on 03/06/2006 6:39:40 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog; mad_as_he$$

"It doesn't really work that way. You are not going to ever see a situation where one Raptor is alone against 20 enemy aircraft, all of them fighters. Typically you will see a 2-section or a 4-section. 4 Raptors would destroy 20 current enemy fighters with ease, but they would not get the chance."

I know such a situation is extremely unlikely. What I meant was that if we are faced by an AF with large numbers of modern aircraft, we need a significant number of Raptors to counter the threat. Otherwise, some military-hating politicians like Kerry would have the military buy 5 Raptors and say "that's enough"

"As soon as airplanes start blowing up, those remaining would run like hell from the area. We don't need 900 Raptors under any circumstances. 200-250 will be plenty. Air Combat is never a war of attrition."

I guess you're right. It would be pretty cool to have 900 Raptors in the AF though :)

If we only order 250 I guess the F-15s won't be replaced on a one-for-one basis.

"One F-22 took on FIVE F-15's driven by F-22 qualified pilots. The fight was over before the F-15's even knew he was there. That's very impressive stuff. F-22 may not be able to kill 20 enemy birds but after 4 or 5 most will turn and run. Of course the F-22 can outrun most stuff simply be fuel conservation. Mach 1 without the burners on is very cool $hit."

Yep, I heard about that. The F-15 pilot couldnt even detect the Raptor on radar, and only became aware of him when he had visual. The Raptor's an awesome plane :-) :-)


30 posted on 03/06/2006 6:40:07 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
//The F-22s can get to Alaska intercepts as quickly as having the present wings already in Alaska//

Now that is truly amazing.

Think of that against the century series aircraft.

Wolf
31 posted on 03/06/2006 6:42:11 PM PST by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

wouldnt that be nice. How 'bout we abolish welfare and buy 3,000 :-D


32 posted on 03/06/2006 6:42:15 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME
My VERY personal take on aircraft beauty (and only beauty):

1. F-15 Eagle

2. F-14 Tomcat

3. F-22 Raptor

4. A-10 Warthog

5. F-16 Falcon

6. SR-71 Blackbird

7. F/A 18 Super Hornet

8. B1 Lancer

9. B-52 Superfortress

10. AC-130 Spectre/Striker


33 posted on 03/06/2006 6:43:00 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf
I think that is a possible scenario, but in order for the Chinese to mass all that capability and prepare it for a strike they are going to have to telegraph their intentions for several days (we keep a pretty close watch on where they keep their toys). With that in mind, it is unlikely the F-22's will face that incoming wall alone. For starters, the Taiwanese Air Force is very capable. Their pilots are very motivated, well trained, and they have excellent equipment. Couple that with a carrier air wing or two and additional aircraft operating out of Japan and instead of F-22's standing alone against the world, you use your F-22's to target specific high value targets which will cripple that incoming Chinese hoard by severing its vital command and control networks. Then you have them pick off the most capable Chinese fighters, while our more conventional air assets concentrate on the less capable second generation Chinese fighters.

just my thoughts anyway...

34 posted on 03/06/2006 6:43:57 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

That was all brought out during the base closure hearings here in Fairbanks last summer. It seems kind of amazing to me. Those new planes must be close to being Star Wars X-fighters.


35 posted on 03/06/2006 6:44:43 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"The fighter squads in Alaska are being phased out as the F-22s based in Washington come online."

I don't believe this is correct. The F-22 will be based in Alaska, but not in Washington.

36 posted on 03/06/2006 6:46:00 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Yeah, and we really don't need Alaska, do we?...


37 posted on 03/06/2006 6:46:05 PM PST by null and void (I nominate Sept 11th: "National Moderate Muslim Day of Tacit Approval". - Mr. Rational, paraphrased)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Yeah our legacy craft can still kick ass with awacs and BVR missiles.The F-15 is still a beast. :)


38 posted on 03/06/2006 6:47:13 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf
You cant absolutely deny such a scenario can you?

Yes.

What, you think we don't watch China by satellite 24/7? Do you have any idea what it would take to stage such an attack? Long before they were ready to go, our subs would be parked in every major water way, ready to sink any ship that moved. Then the President calls China and asks if they really want to dance.

Come on.

39 posted on 03/06/2006 6:47:27 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RunningWolf

"A huge wave with a little of everything they have from Mig21's (out of the bone yard lightly loaded with guns and ground attack rockets) to the lasted and greatest fighters they have. ECM aircraft, Blinders and BackFires coming in supersonic on the waters deck, surface to surface missile assault and so on.

Call me an idiot if you want, but say why too. You cant absolutely deny such a scenario can you?"

I could definitely see such a scenario. The Chinese have tons of aircraft. They have around 1,000 MiG-21s of various configurations, from the "Vanilla J-7" with only 2 hardpoints to the more capable MiG-21 variants like the regular J-7 and the J-8I/II.

Then they have 150 Su-30 MKK, about 200 Su-27s (plus around 160+ more being built) and maybe 100 J-10s, with more J-10s entering service each year. Apparently, the PLAAF has opted not to acquire the FC-1.

Then there are almost 1,500 MiG-19s (extremely old but in such huge numbers, formidable) and about 470 ancient planes used for training but still combat capable, mostly MiG-17s.

Finally there are 120 obsolete Tu-16 bombers.

That's 3,000 planes. Even if all our Raptors were on Taiwan they'd be outnumbered more than 16-1.

And thats not counting ones possibly destroyed by the Chinese missile strikes on Taiwan before the ChiCom AF arrives.


40 posted on 03/06/2006 6:49:58 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson