Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polling analysis finds GOP in the lead
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060227-123359-5955r.htm ^ | 2/27/06 | Donald Lambro

Posted on 02/27/2006 10:08:01 AM PST by mathprof

Most polls say a majority of registered voters would vote Democrat if the congressional elections were held today, but a new independent polling analysis now finds that Republicans could lead among people who actually vote.

The CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll reported last week that the Democrats led Republicans among registered voters in the generic congressional survey by 50 percent to 43 percent, a seven-point margin that could give Democrats enough victories to take control of the House, if their supporters participate in November's elections.

But a deeper analysis of these numbers by David W. Moore for the Gallup Poll said, "It is likely many voters will not do so" because turnout among registered voters tends to be lower than that among "likely voters" who say they plan to vote and usually do.

In his analysis, Mr. Moore writes that Gallup's "experience over the past two midterm elections, in 1998 and 2002, suggests that the [registered voters] numbers tend to overstate the Democratic margin by about 10? percentage points."

"Given that Democrats currently lead by seven points, that could mean that among people who will definitely vote, Republicans actually lead by three to four points," he said.

Republican election strategists long have maintained the so-called generic numbers, in which voters are asked which party they will support in the elections, without mentioning a specific candidate, skew in favor of the Democrats.

Mr. Moore's admission about past generic polls of registered voters is rare, coming from a major polling organization, Republican campaign strategists said last week.

"It's an amazing, very rare admission. Republican pollsters have argued for the last couple of decades that the generic congressional polls always overstate the Democrats' participation," said Wes Anderson, a pollster with OnMessage Inc, a Republican polling and media firm.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; congress; election; gop; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Interesting. I hope they're right.
1 posted on 02/27/2006 10:08:02 AM PST by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Now if we could only get rid of our governor, Janet Napolitano.......................


2 posted on 02/27/2006 10:13:14 AM PST by hsmomx3 (Steelers in '07--Go BIG BEN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Great, Repubs stand a good chance.


Now if we could just get some conservatives elected.


3 posted on 02/27/2006 10:17:00 AM PST by trubluolyguy (Freedom of choice? Choose to keep your damned legs closed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I hope they get rid of Hillary.

Image hosting by Photobucket

4 posted on 02/27/2006 10:17:08 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Oh... and Fat Teddy the Swimmer. What on earth would it take to get the voters in Massachusetts to turn on this waste of good Scotch?

Image hosting by Photobucket

5 posted on 02/27/2006 10:18:21 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

She will still be the Senator from New York, she just won't be President of the United States of America.


6 posted on 02/27/2006 10:22:11 AM PST by Talking_Mouse (Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just... Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

1/3 of Dem "voters" never get turn-off the soaps, close the bag of chips, get up off their asses, and actually go to the polls to vote. A poll of "the public" is always useless because of this.


7 posted on 02/27/2006 10:28:34 AM PST by pabianice (contact ebay??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
Republicans could lead among people who actually vote

Which is really all that matters.

8 posted on 02/27/2006 10:29:08 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
the [registered voters] numbers tend to overstate the Democratic margin by about 10 percentage points."

And yet most pollsters still use "registered voters" as their sample.

9 posted on 02/27/2006 10:30:22 AM PST by My2Cents ("The essence of American journalism is vulgarity divested of truth." -- Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
What on earth would it take to get the voters in Massachusetts to turn on this waste of good Scotch?

Well, for starters there could be a choice. Running unopposed is a joke.

10 posted on 02/27/2006 10:32:18 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Here we go again... The only numbers that matter are those taken within a given political race, such as a Congressional District or state, in che case of Senators. Most people say they would favor their party, but when it comes down to electing someone, it's almost always the incumbent -- regardless of their political party. This poll is completely meaningless.


11 posted on 02/27/2006 10:34:31 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
And yet most pollsters still use "registered voters" as their sample.

And the talking heads, and many here on FR, sight them as valid proof of whatever point they are pushing that day.

12 posted on 02/27/2006 10:34:41 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Finally somebody digs deep enough to see the truth. The best example is "Rock the Vote"...aren't they just about to close up shop...didn't vote...huummmm, even though that was to be non partisian, just get out the vote, what happened...they went to free concerts, registered but couldn't remember what day to go to the polls...to busy listening to their lovely hate music.


13 posted on 02/27/2006 10:34:54 AM PST by TatieBug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

It's all in the boundary lines. Most Dem or GOP districts are *entrenched*. The Dems are still wishing for a seachange and they aren't going to get one. If anything, the redistricting in Texas, Georgia and elsewhere will make the GOP stronger than they were in 2000.


14 posted on 02/27/2006 10:36:56 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
I can answer that.

A Republican willing and financially able to run against him. We had a rino who was going to this year, but he has dropped out. Sometimes I think the RNC has written off MA, which leaves conservatives there without representation.
15 posted on 02/27/2006 10:37:03 AM PST by gidget7 (Get GLSEN out of our schools!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Well .. according to our own DrDeb - most of the polsters are misusing their polling models so we should not be relying on any polls unless we know the stats they are using. If you check out DrDeb's posts - you will see some guidelines for what polls are accurate and what polls are not.

Remember .. polsters can ask questions to get whatever result they want .. and the dems are good at skewing the questions.


16 posted on 02/27/2006 10:43:24 AM PST by CyberAnt (Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trubluolyguy
Great, Repubs stand a good chance. Now if we could just get some conservatives elected.

First good news I've heard in awhile.

17 posted on 02/27/2006 10:52:56 AM PST by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Thanks for posting this. It is interesting.


18 posted on 02/27/2006 10:57:25 AM PST by syriacus (Hillary says: Millions to China's state-run shippers; not one RED cent to the UAE shippers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

That is why Oregon, Washington state and several others are going to all mail-in voting in lots of elections. Then these dead beats can vote from home while watching Opra.


19 posted on 02/27/2006 11:00:29 AM PST by RetiredArmy (America is doomed to be socialist. Way too many people with palms pointed up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

This is shocking! (not)

Third party Freepers are deeply saddened.


20 posted on 02/27/2006 11:00:29 AM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson