Posted on 02/26/2006 7:13:10 PM PST by A. Pole
Dubai Ports World is not a security threat. And the UAE is a friend.
The brouhaha surrounding the Bush administration since it gave the green light to a United Arab Emirates company slated to manage six major U.S. ports has nothing to do with homeland security. Allow me to give this episode its proper name: Islamophobia.
This UAE company - Dubai Ports World - is a commercial administrator. They are not a security company, and should the deal go through they will not be in charge of security at a half-dozen U.S. ports. That responsibility remains tight in the hands of our U.S. Coast Guard and Customs officials. Meanwhile, the same longshoremen and stevedores will be hauling containers. Moreover, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (a multi-agency panel which includes seasoned representatives from the departments of Defense, Treasury, and Homeland Security) has vetted this deal and given it their seal of approval.
None of the eager critics of this business transaction can furnish a scintilla of evidence that the Bush administration hasn’t done its security due diligence on DP World. And so far, no one has proven that the security-vetting process of the executive branch is flawed. Instead, what we have here is a perfect storm of bi-partisan criticism based on a combination of nearsighted protectionism and xenophobic anti-Arab sentiment.
An amusing component of this flare-up is the sudden call to arms of the dovish Democrats. Aren’t many of these vocal critics the same folks who opposed the Patriot Act? Isn’t this the same posturing chorus that opposed NSA surveillance of al Qaeda phone calls? Didn’t these same folks want immediate withdrawal from Iraq? Why the sudden about face?
The entire case against the DP World deal is built on nonsense. The UAE is an American ally in an unsettled Middle East - and an important ally at that. They are exactly the kind of Arab country we need in our ongoing, critical mission in the region and the broader war effort. The UAE is not unlike our good friend Jordan, and is a whole lot better than Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The Wall Street Journal correctly pointed out this week that
"Critics also forget, or conveniently ignore, that the UAE government has been among the most helpful Arab countries in the war on terror. It was one of the first countries to join the U.S. container security initiative, which seeks to inspect cargo in foreign ports. The UAE has assisted in training security forces in Iraq, and at home it has worked hard to stem terrorist financing and WMD proliferation. UAE leaders are as much an al Qaeda target as Tony Blair."
Deputy Defense secretary Gordon England told a Senate panel that "The UAE today is a good friend and a good ally. They stand side by side with us in the war on terrorism." For the Pentagon, the UAE offers the region’s only deep-water port and dry-dock facility, large enough to take in aircraft carriers and nuclear subs. Two of its ports, including the DP World-administered Jebel Ali Port in Dubai, host more U.S. naval visits than any other facility outside the United States. The country also hosts major air bases for U.S. refueling and surveillance flights.
Additionally, UAE central bank officials have strengthened anti-money-laundering and terror-financing laws and have greatly increased oversight of their financial system. The UAE is also the only country in the Middle East that allows U.S. customs inspectors to check cargo headed to America.
Could Bush have done a better job in handling all of this? Sure. The president made some clear political marketing mistakes. In particular, he should have opened up the black-box of executive review and shared it with members of Congress. Transparency in government is always a good thing.
But in the end, America ought to honor its word. We have a duty to keep our promise to Dubai Ports and the UAE, a country that deserves the same fair treatment we give all our allies. There is no room for prejudice or bigotry here.
Make no mistake about it. What is going on right now on cable news channels, in the newspapers, and over the Internet is simple Islamophobia. The Democrats who are vocally against the deal are assuredly motivated by political gain. But Republicans should know better. If we’re to win the fight against the Islamofascists, a tiny minority of the Muslim community, we cannot afford to erect political, trade, or commercial barriers against those Arab nations who have aligned themselves with the U.S. in the terror war and who wish to do business with us as part of that alliance.
Repulsing them is just plain stupid. Tearing down barriers to promote global connectivity is a much better strategy wherever it makes national-security sense.
Dubai has offered their help. We should take it.
bump
Disagree with something now days and it's the old, pull the racist card out of the hat trick.
"And the UAE is a friend."
How many of the 9/11 hijackers came from the UAE? The unelected dictatorship that runs their country may be our "friend".. but that doesn't mean that the managers and employees hired by DPW will be our "friends"... any more than the banking employees that laundered al-Qaeda money.
"Disagree with something now days and it's the old, pull the racist card out of the hat trick."
Isn't that the truth? The deal supporters are learning from the Democrat playbook.
Anti-Islamic Bigotry *PING*
You disagree with the author? You kudlowphobic!
Yep, chapter and verse.
So, the UAE being an Islamic Country has nothing to do with your opposition to the deal?
You think being wary of islamics is irrational at this point in our history?
Its a shame, Goebbels didn't realize that to fend off critics of mass slaughter he could have just coin the term, "Naziphobe". Would have saved him allot of time and effort in his propaganda campaign.
I am not opposed to the UAE deal; however, what's wrong with "Islamophobia," and why shouldn't we be experiencing it, judged on what we've seen over the last few years?
I think any Islamic country wanting to do business here should have to prove its bona fides. If all they want to do is make a buck, that's fine, and they can do it here. But our experience has told us that many Muslim countries have other objectives, or are under the gun from forces within them that have other objectives. If we didn't have "Islamophobia," we'd be either too nuts or too stupid to be worthy of hanging onto our society.
Terrorist flying into buildings killing Americans has a tendency for me not to trust them. Carry your own baggage, don't put it off on me.
Sad. I thought only 'Rats screamed homophobia, or racist or anything-I'm-for-and-you're-not-o-phobia. Guess not. I guess anyone who can't argue the facts will start calling names. I expected more from Larry Kudlow.
Thats what it seems like. I've never seen the 'race card' played so much, here on FR.
Wrong.. They may be a business partner but they are no Friend..
Since all of the other cards have been dealt and discredited the only card left in the deck to the anti-Bushites is the race card. Their argument is "Arabs Bad".
I responded with "if you had a lick of sense, Hitler brainwashed/convinced his people into thinking they were a master race. The jews were inferior to their(Nazism) strain of being. The jews were considered parasitic to the Nazis. It had very little to do with religion... Just incase you missed it...
Now, here you are again accusing people of hate/bigotry. Why are you making comments, and not replying to those who you call names?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.