Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush distances himself from ports deal
Herald Sun ^ | 23 February 2006

Posted on 02/22/2006 4:19:34 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

THE White House sought to distance itself today from the US administration's approval of an Arab company's takeover of operations at major US ports, a day after President George W. Bush vowed to veto any legislation to block the deal.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the president was not aware of the pending deal until it was approved and had become public but then checked with cabinet secretaries to make sure they stood by their approval of the plan by state-controlled Dubai Ports World to manage six ports.

Mr Bush held a rare news conference on Air Force One yesterday to say the deal should go forward despite lawmakers concerns it posed security risks and said he would veto legislation aimed at stopping it.

"He made sure to check with them (the cabinet) even after this got more attention from the press, to make sure they were comfortable with the decision that was made. Every one of the Cabinet secretaries expressed that they were comfortable with this transaction being approved," Mr McClellan said.

Mr McClellan said the president "became aware of it over the last several days".

Asked if Mr Bush did not know about the ports deal until it was a "done deal", he said, "That's correct".

The question of whether state-controlled Dubai Ports World of the United Arab Emirates should be allowed to control the ports has sparked a political storm for Mr Bush at a time when he is struggling to boost sagging public approval ratings.

The White House continued a spirited defence of the deal, which has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans and Democrats alike on Capitol Hill and vows to block the deal.

Mr McClellan said to not go forward with the deal would send a "terrible message" because it would hold a Middle Eastern company to a different standard than a British company and because the United Arab Emirates has been a strong partner in the war on terrorism.

Rejecting the deal, he said, could have consequences.

"You have to take into account the broader foreign policy implications," he said. "We should be working to broaden our partnership in the broader war on terrorism."

Concerns about the vulnerability of US ports have grown since the September 11 attacks.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bogusheadline; doeswknowanything; followthemoney; loopwhatloop; nottoocuriousgeorge; openborderbots; outoftheloop; ports; presidentbush; presidentlogan; sanborn; sendoutlaura; snow; uae; weneedjackbauer; weresexistagain; whatmeworry; wisoutofit; wppff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last
To: Flux Capacitor
----The UAE is a Arab friend.----

Maybe, maybe not, but we don't need to twist thier nipples on this one. It's a UK company selling an asset to another company,I know it will be owned by a state, UAE, but so what..the world econ is here! Thanks GHWB & Bubba,
101 posted on 02/22/2006 6:11:03 PM PST by Driver32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Headline misleading.

I don't see Bush distancing himself. What am I missing?

102 posted on 02/22/2006 6:13:58 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

THE White House sought to distance itself today from the US administration's approval of an Arab company's takeover of operations at major US ports, a day after President George W. Bush vowed to veto any legislation to block the deal.




Well.....DUH!

Someone woke up and smacked El Presidente in the back of the head.


103 posted on 02/22/2006 6:14:06 PM PST by trubluolyguy (I don't hate Arabs. But I wouldn't trust a muzzie as far as I could throw Ted Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

104 posted on 02/22/2006 6:16:35 PM PST by Graymatter (...and what are we going to do about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
Calling yourself a conservative does not necessarily make you one.

Stupid comment. It has nothing to do with liberal or conservative. The War on Terror is a smart or stupid thing. Either your smart and know we need to fight (like Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman, John McCain; hardly liberals i know, but not conservatives by any definition) or your stupid and think we should just "get along" with the terrorists.

105 posted on 02/22/2006 6:20:37 PM PST by curtisgardner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservative blonde
Why don't you knee jerkers quit with you innane comments. You are listening to the MSM and believing their stories. This has been around for a few months and no one gave it a second take. Now all of a sudden when the DemocRATS think they can pile on Bush, Republicans get wobbly. What a bunch of wusses. Our ports have been operated by foreign governments all along. The UAE is a Arab friend. If we cannot recognize Arab friends, we might as well forget about being a super power.

I agree with nearly everything the blonde said. Why do we all of a sudden swallow the CRAP the LameStream Media spews??? It is, on the whole, GARBAGE. Utter, putrid, vile and filthy garbage.

THIS IS THE SAME PRESS THAT ONE WEEK AGO TODAY WAS INSINUATING DICK CHENEY WAS A DRUNK!!

Give me a break.

106 posted on 02/22/2006 6:22:36 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

This is a $7 BILLION dollar deal. Just follow the money and see who got paid off. I'm betting that there are some GOP heavy hitters who stand to make a great deal of money from this.


107 posted on 02/22/2006 6:28:21 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
This is a $7 BILLION dollar deal.

Only $7 Billion ?? Thats pocket change to an American such as Bill Gates ... so I propose this:
Since the main concern of this deal is about port security, why not offer the deal to an American company with expertise in port security, such as Microsoft ...... umm, ummmm ... well, never mind ........ /sarcasm off :)

108 posted on 02/22/2006 6:41:31 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: curtisgardner

Perhaps you should read ALL my posts and responses before accusing me of "just wanting to get along with the terrorists.


109 posted on 02/22/2006 6:46:02 PM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
So...is this guy is a drunk or is he MSM ?

Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. President & CEO, The Center for Security Policy

110 posted on 02/22/2006 7:27:02 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle
Wow. Here's more of my humble opinion. :-)

"He said he found out about the purchase, which transfers operations at ports in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia to the Persian Gulf company, last Tuesday in meetings with senior Bush administration officials." Now let us be carefull here. Notice he elaberates that operations are being transfered. NOT PORTS being sold.

DPW is purchasing P&O. Nobody said anything about purchasing the ports. P&O, a British (ally) company provided port operations. DPW, a UAE (not necessarily an ally, depending on who you believe) company wants to do the same thing.

But the issue is whether we can trust the United Arab Emirit's state owned Dubai Ports World...

Bingo.

That is what I think is happening here. And we are seeing a lot of kneejerking by all forms that are either not fully informed of what the deal is or they are playing politics or in some cases both scenarios.

Probably true. There is not enough concrete information out there and the White House has done NOTHING to help matters. Piss Poor PR. Good god! How did these people THINK we'd react?

Finally as voiced in some of the other posts, the UAE seems to be doing a lot to track and capture Islamic terrorist in their country.

Again, depends on who you believe.

They maintain huge port facilities obviously that ship a lot of gas and oil to this country. We maintain quite a friendly business level with them as well as them working with us on the war on terror. And we basically assure them Iran will not get away with sinking their ships or sending nukes by missles into their country to disrupt their oil/gas business. In short they are depending a lot on us to protect their country's interests. Now with this being the case. Are they going to allow terrorist to somehow infiltrate their operation and ruin all the good things they have going for them? Food for thought.

To me the question is, do We The People trust them enough to turn over major US port operations and all the knowledge and access that entails? At this point I'm not sold on that idea and the Bush Administration has done nothing at all to help change my mind. I don't think they've quite figured out that since 9/11 we are awake and paying attention. They'd better start explaining things and stop trying to slip these kinds of things past us. If this is all the information I'm going to get then I vote we err on the side of caution. No. I simply do not trust the UAE enough.

111 posted on 02/22/2006 7:37:02 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: conservative blonde
Here is what needs to be considered:

"The UAE is not exactly stuffed stem to stern with pro-American individuals; the idea that the emirs will stand foursquare against infiltration by those who have ulterior motives is the sort of wishful thinking that makes buildings fall and cities empty. I’m not worried that some evil emir is putting a pinky to his monocled eye, and saying Mwah! at last I have them where I want them! I’m worried about the guy who’s three steps down the management branch handing off a job to a brother who trusts some guys who have some sympathies with some guys who hang around some rather energetic fellows who attend that one mosque where the guy talks about jihad 24/7, and somehow someone gets a job somewhere that makes it easier for something to happen."

112 posted on 02/22/2006 7:55:03 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

this is starting to look like a classic Bush rope-a-dope for the Dems


113 posted on 02/22/2006 7:55:56 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Driver32
----The UAE is a Arab friend.----

There are no friends, only interests.

114 posted on 02/22/2006 7:57:18 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Harriet Miers Event, Part II.


115 posted on 02/22/2006 8:00:33 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

"So GW didn't know about it, but he appointed one of the major players to a government position, but he will veto any attempted legislation to quell the deal, but he only found out about the deal a few days ago."

Deserves a repost...my take on the matter, exactly!



116 posted on 02/22/2006 8:02:36 PM PST by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Not to mention that as this news unfolds, Al Queda listens and considers.


117 posted on 02/22/2006 8:02:58 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
I respect your feedback. Well answered. I don't neccessarily trust them either. Some of my original response was based on other posts we read at FR today. I think at this point at least some of the basic issues are established. The issue as you elaborated is can we trust their people that will have access to learning how our ports operate. And I can appreciate that. One thing I had brought out in one of the four post responds was, is if they buy out P&O, then who do we find in short order to replace their operation that can be trusted.
And I cannot help but wonder why P&O's stock holders and operating officers are so eager to sell out to DPW. One would think the operations they where running in our ports and elsewhere was a profit making operation. No response solicited unless you want to add something.
I would only add. Yes, the admin is doing a piss poor job of better explaining the issue in full. Sometimes they think what is the use. Anything they say is basically twisted around, so why offer more meat to the L/MSM to have fun with. And to wade through a thorough explaination will bore 90% of the public. Most don't take well to details. And many don't understand how things operate, and why. So this president keeps as low a profile as he can. Rope a dope if you will. Then comes back later on and makes the press and libs look rather stupid on many things. But that digresses from this particular issue. Do have a great upcoming day.
118 posted on 02/22/2006 8:35:56 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Flux Capacitor
and threatening to use something called the "Veto Pen", which, for the last five years, has been stored away in the same government warehouse that contains the Ark of the Covenant.

Hahahahahaha

119 posted on 02/22/2006 10:17:28 PM PST by processing please hold (Be careful of charity and kindness, lest you do more harm with open hands than with a clinched fist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Every day I've been here people have posted about how the MSM spin things. I guess when they spin it their way, those opposed to this plan don't much mind.

I'd agree with that.

120 posted on 02/22/2006 10:29:18 PM PST by Herford Turley (Conservatism will save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson