Posted on 02/22/2006 2:55:31 PM PST by presidio9
Patti Davis, the daughter of the late President Ronald Reagan, spoke fervently Tuesday night to an audience at Tilson Hall about the ability of stem cell research to save lives.
The 2005-2006 Indiana State University Speaker Series wrapped up Tuesday night with Davis, whose father succumbed to Alzheimers disease in 2004.
Davis, 53, a writer and a vocal advocate for embryonic stem cell research, spoke about the final years of her fathers life, her work promoting stem cell research and her thoughts about the current White House administration.
Her most recent book, The Long Goodbye, is a chronicle of the decade from her fathers diagnosis in 1994 to his death in the summer of 2004. Ironically, during Reagans presidency and 11 years before his own diagnosis, he named November as National Alzheimers Disease Month to bring awareness to the disorder.
In The Long Goodbye (so named for her mother, Nancy Reagans, characterization of Alzheimers disease), Davis explores the progression of her fathers illness as well as her improved relationship with her family.
Davis, who during the 1980s publicly alienated herself from her father and his politics, said communicating with her family has been a learning curve for her.
Its the way in which you communicate things much more than what youre communicating, she said. I hurt my father terribly back then, not because he was intolerant of my beliefs, but because of the way in which I was expressing myself; I was very strident and angry.
After those rocky years, Davis says it was important for her to get it right as her father entered his final battle with Alzheimers.
Part of getting it right included embracing the ideas that Reagan taught her, she said.
My faith is my fathers faith, that this world is not the only story there is, she said. I dont think that death ends a relationship.
Davis said throughout the ordeal, she and her mother, Nancy, often reminded each other that his soul doesnt have Alzheimers.
Davis, along with her mother and brother, Ron Reagan, have become vocal advocates for legislation to allow stem cell research.
Embryonic stem cell research is currently not federally funded in the United States. Some medical researchers believe that stem cells, which retain the ability to change into other cell types, may be able to repair specific tissues or to grow organs. The potential implications and benefits would require years of intensive study.
Stem cell research has ignited debate over the ethical consequences. With the present state of technology, starting a stem cell line requires the destruction of a human embryo. Some opponents of the research argue that this practice is a slippery slope to reproductive cloning, and many on religious grounds oppose the destruction of human embryos.
In discussing her hopes for stem cell research, Davis argued that the practice is being rejected really because of politics.
She also claimed the one real tragedy of the current political climate is that religion has been used in the service of politics. Davis also told the audience that, in her opinion, politics had become more important than compassion.
Your faith is between you and God, she told one audience member who addressed her during the final Q&A, not between you and George Bush.
In her comments to the audience assembled in the Tilson Hall auditorium, Davis recalled the comments of first lady Laura Bush upon the death of Reagan.
Bush offered her condolences to the Reagan family but refused to support stem cell research, saying it had not been proven to cure disease and that it would be unfair to give citizens false hope.
Davis told the audience she does not believe in false hope.
There is only hope or the absence of hope it would be an egregious error not to move forward with a new frontier of medicine, she said.
Davis also bemoaned the interchanging of terms such as cloning with stem cell research, reminding the audience the two are not the same.
In an interview conducted earlier Tuesday afternoon, Davis said of her work with stem cell research, The best I can do is to continue getting the word out, which my mother and brother are doing as well. People arent the problem; the current administration is the problem.
ping
Her father, I daresay, would have refused therapies derived from aborted fetuses.
I always found it interesting that this pos excuse for a daughter celebrates the fact that she got back aboard the gravy train after her father was too incapacitated to let her know what a profound disappointment she was.
Patti hears what the MSM hears when Laura spoke on this:
But here's what her father believed in, Life:
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...
This was the only logical position in the article, as opposed to her implied "I feel."
In an interview conducted earlier Tuesday afternoon, Davis said of her work with stem cell research...
So she's a scientist now?
/sarcasm
We really don't know what the relationship was, and it isn't our place to speculate. I have no doubt that Nancy shared her husband's values, and she is standing with both her kids on the stem cell issue, and the relationship between her and Patti seems to have healed. God bless them all.
So she's still campaigning against her father...who cares? A real headline would be - Ron Jr. Goes Straight..
Patti, sit down and shut up!
Facts follow.
I can't tell whether the author is a fool or a fraud, but I can say that she is abso-frappin-lutely one or the other.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Ter-ay-za Heinz bemoaned the lack of funding for stem cell research during the '04 campaign. If she is so upset, she should have taken a few tens of millions of dollars from her bank account to fund this work.
I think we should use aborted lab animal embryo's, that would mess with their minds.
She's advocating the wrong kind of stem cells. Someone needs to get her the info on ADULT stem cells, and the successes that researchers are having with them.
Thanks for the ping!
ProLife Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Her position is wrong. However, one does not need to be a scientist to be able to make that judgement. Scientists are given entirely too much credit nowadays.
Correction
I wrote "There are restrictions on using federal funds for embryonic stem cell research. State, insititional and corporate money is not affected by this narrow "ban.""
There are actually few to no restrictions on using federal funds for research on certain existing cell lines of human embryonic stem cells. The restriction is on creating new stem cell lines (i.e., destroying new embryos) with Federal money.
Really, the only thing driving the train is some people's desire to hav a few more gold teeth in the vault.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.