Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ronald Reagan’s daughter caps ISU Speaker Series with passionate plea for stem cell research
Terre Haute Tribune Star ^ | February 21, 2006 | Deb McKee

Posted on 02/22/2006 2:55:31 PM PST by presidio9

Patti Davis, the daughter of the late President Ronald Reagan, spoke fervently Tuesday night to an audience at Tilson Hall about the ability of stem cell research to save lives.

The 2005-2006 Indiana State University Speaker Series wrapped up Tuesday night with Davis, whose father succumbed to Alzheimer’s disease in 2004.

Davis, 53, a writer and a vocal advocate for embryonic stem cell research, spoke about the final years of her father’s life, her work promoting stem cell research and her thoughts about the current White House administration.

Her most recent book, “The Long Goodbye,” is a chronicle of the decade from her father’s diagnosis in 1994 to his death in the summer of 2004. Ironically, during Reagan’s presidency and 11 years before his own diagnosis, he named November as National Alzheimer’s Disease Month to bring awareness to the disorder.

In “The Long Goodbye” (so named for her mother, Nancy Reagan’s, characterization of Alzheimer’s disease), Davis explores the progression of her father’s illness as well as her improved relationship with her family.

Davis, who during the 1980s publicly alienated herself from her father and his politics, said communicating with her family has been a learning curve for her.

“It’s the way in which you communicate things much more than what you’re communicating,” she said. “I hurt my father terribly back then, not because he was intolerant of my beliefs, but because of the way in which I was expressing myself; I was very strident and angry.”

After those “rocky years,” Davis says it was important for her to “get it right” as her father entered his final battle with Alzheimer’s.

Part of getting it right included embracing the ideas that Reagan taught her, she said.

“My faith is my father’s faith, that this world is not the only story there is,” she said. “I don’t think that death ends a relationship.”

Davis said throughout the ordeal, she and her mother, Nancy, often reminded each other that “his soul doesn’t have Alzheimer’s.”

Davis, along with her mother and brother, Ron Reagan, have become vocal advocates for legislation to allow stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cell research is currently not federally funded in the United States. Some medical researchers believe that stem cells, which retain the ability to change into other cell types, may be able to repair specific tissues or to grow organs. The potential implications and benefits would require years of intensive study.

Stem cell research has ignited debate over the ethical consequences. With the present state of technology, starting a stem cell ‘line’ requires the destruction of a human embryo. Some opponents of the research argue that this practice is a slippery slope to reproductive cloning, and many on religious grounds oppose the destruction of human embryos.

In discussing her hopes for stem cell research, Davis argued that the practice is being “rejected really because of politics.”

She also claimed the “one real tragedy” of the current political climate is that “religion has been used in the service of politics.” Davis also told the audience that, in her opinion, politics had become more important than compassion.

“Your faith is between you and God,” she told one audience member who addressed her during the final Q&A, “not between you and George Bush.”

In her comments to the audience assembled in the Tilson Hall auditorium, Davis recalled the comments of first lady Laura Bush upon the death of Reagan.

Bush offered her condolences to the Reagan family but refused to support stem cell research, saying it had not been proven to cure disease and that it would be unfair to give citizens false hope.

Davis told the audience she does not believe in false hope.

“There is only hope or the absence of hope … it would be an egregious error not to move forward with a new frontier of medicine,” she said.

Davis also bemoaned the interchanging of terms such as “cloning” with “stem cell research,” reminding the audience the two are not the same.

In an interview conducted earlier Tuesday afternoon, Davis said of her work with stem cell research, “The best I can do is to continue getting the word out, which my mother and brother are doing as well. People aren’t the problem; the current administration is the problem.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: pattidavis; stemcellresearch

1 posted on 02/22/2006 2:55:33 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; Mr. Silverback

ping


2 posted on 02/22/2006 2:57:14 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Her father, I daresay, would have refused therapies derived from aborted fetuses.


3 posted on 02/22/2006 2:57:25 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Patti Davis is exactly who I would invite to speak about stem cell research. Yeah, right.
4 posted on 02/22/2006 3:00:07 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I always found it interesting that this pos excuse for a daughter celebrates the fact that she got back aboard the gravy train after her father was too incapacitated to let her know what a profound disappointment she was.


5 posted on 02/22/2006 3:01:29 PM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; anniegetyourgun; ...

Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!

Patti hears what the MSM hears when Laura spoke on this:

But here's what her father believed in, Life:

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...

6 posted on 02/22/2006 3:03:26 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Bush offered her condolences to the Reagan family but refused to support stem cell research, saying it had not been proven to cure disease and that it would be unfair to give citizens false hope.

This was the only logical position in the article, as opposed to her implied "I feel."

In an interview conducted earlier Tuesday afternoon, Davis said of her work with stem cell research...

So she's a scientist now?

/sarcasm

7 posted on 02/22/2006 3:05:08 PM PST by scott7278 (Livin' the life some consider a myth,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I believe most experts agree that stem cell research will not benefit victims of alzheimers.
8 posted on 02/22/2006 3:05:21 PM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I always found it interesting that this pos excuse for a daughter celebrates the fact that she got back aboard the gravy train after her father was too incapacitated to let her know what a profound disappointment she was.

We really don't know what the relationship was, and it isn't our place to speculate. I have no doubt that Nancy shared her husband's values, and she is standing with both her kids on the stem cell issue, and the relationship between her and Patti seems to have healed. God bless them all.

9 posted on 02/22/2006 3:06:28 PM PST by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So she's still campaigning against her father...who cares? A real headline would be - Ron Jr. Goes Straight..


10 posted on 02/22/2006 3:10:02 PM PST by Conservative Coulter Fan (One of the greatet conservative accomplishments would be the undoing of FDR’s big government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Patti, sit down and shut up!


11 posted on 02/22/2006 3:13:32 PM PST by Bigg Red (Never trust Democrats with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This is an extremely poorly written article. It states and/or implies a number of outright falsehoods.

Facts follow.

  1. There is no ban on stem cell research

  2. There is extensive government support for adult, marrow, umbilical stem cell research.

  3. There are restrictions on using federal funds for embryonic stem cell research. State, insititional and corporate money is not affected by this narrow "ban."

  4. California alone has a very large sum ($3 billion?) set aside for embryonic stem cell research, but it's going begging because...

  5. ... so far, embryonic stem cells have not been able to grow anything but fast-growing cancers. They have produced no therapies for any illnesses.

  6. No embryonic stem cell therapy has made it to animal trials.

  7. On the other hand, adult & umbilical stem cells have almost 100 proven therapeutic treatments and over 1,000 human clinical trials underway.

  8. All stem cell successes to date -- all! -- have been with autologous or umbilical cells. This includes routine treatments for one-time death sentences like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

  9. One insuperable advantage of autologous stem cells is that they normally do not provoke any autoimmune response, as they are a natural tissue match -- genetically identical with their own donor/recipient.

  10. The principal promoters of embryonic stem cells are abortionists, like Planned Parenthood's for-profit clinics, which would be able to harvest a cash crop from their main product.

  11. Conclusion: Writers like this bimbo are either too ignorant to be writing about science, or deliberately obfuscating the issue to try to make embryonic stem cells, which can make Kate Michaelman even richer, look like they're doing the work of autologous stem cells.

I can't tell whether the author is a fool or a fraud, but I can say that she is abso-frappin-lutely one or the other.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

12 posted on 02/22/2006 3:20:02 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F

Ter-ay-za Heinz bemoaned the lack of funding for stem cell research during the '04 campaign. If she is so upset, she should have taken a few tens of millions of dollars from her bank account to fund this work.


13 posted on 02/22/2006 3:29:09 PM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F

I think we should use aborted lab animal embryo's, that would mess with their minds.


14 posted on 02/22/2006 4:37:29 PM PST by X-FID (LOL(Land Of Legislation))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

She's advocating the wrong kind of stem cells. Someone needs to get her the info on ADULT stem cells, and the successes that researchers are having with them.


15 posted on 02/22/2006 4:39:46 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Thanks for the ping!


16 posted on 02/22/2006 9:19:51 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; AliVeritas; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; Augie76; ...

ProLife Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

17 posted on 02/23/2006 7:08:28 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (GOP Blend Coffee--"Coffee for Conservative Taste!" Go to www.gopetc.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scott7278
So she's a scientist now?

Her position is wrong. However, one does not need to be a scientist to be able to make that judgement. Scientists are given entirely too much credit nowadays.

18 posted on 02/23/2006 10:28:51 AM PST by Señor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F

Correction

I wrote "There are restrictions on using federal funds for embryonic stem cell research. State, insititional and corporate money is not affected by this narrow "ban.""

There are actually few to no restrictions on using federal funds for research on certain existing cell lines of human embryonic stem cells. The restriction is on creating new stem cell lines (i.e., destroying new embryos) with Federal money.

Really, the only thing driving the train is some people's desire to hav a few more gold teeth in the vault.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


19 posted on 02/23/2006 11:56:46 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson