Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Malkin: No More Business as Usual / Bush Digs In (Port Deal)
MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 2-22-06 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 02/22/2006 10:16:01 AM PST by cgk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: cgk

Michelle is our belle!!!!


41 posted on 02/22/2006 12:25:06 PM PST by puroresu (Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
If Bush declared the Constitution null and void, and ordered Soviet-style central planning, you would be on the forefront of the parade cheering it on.

It's not often that you see someone reduce their own argument to an absurdity.

42 posted on 02/22/2006 12:30:08 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Bump for some very nice pics of one of our best reporters/thinkers.


43 posted on 02/22/2006 12:31:51 PM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cgk
While I love Malkin and her writings, she is off the deep end on this one. She writes...

"Continuing:

Besides, the notion that the Bush Administration is farming out port "security" to hostile Arab nations is alarmist nonsense. Dubai Ports World would be managing the commercial activities of these U.S. ports, not securing them. There's a difference. Port security falls to Coast Guard and U.S. Customs officials. "Nothing changes with respect to security under the contract," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said yesterday. "The Coast Guard is in charge of security, not the corporation."

Missing. The. Point. The issue is not whether day-to-day, on-the-ground conditions at the ports would change. They presumably wouldn't. The issues are whether we should grant the demonstrably unreliable UAE access to sensitive information and management plans about our key U.S ports, which are plenty insecure enough without adding new risks, and whether the decision process was thorough and free from conflicts of interest."

The security won't change a bit as the operator of the port is not responsible for security, the United States is responsible. Secondly, if the UAE company has purchased the British company who runs the port, would they not already have that information whether we let them run the port or not?? They now own all the information that the British company has on our ports even if we disqualify them from running the port....Michelle needs to bring her normally stunning logic back into the process. She's had a few knee jerk reactions lately and that's not what a Conservative does.
44 posted on 02/22/2006 12:34:26 PM PST by MissouriConservative (I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
These hypocrites are so evil they find loopholes in their own religion...

Too bad they can't find loopholes to the parts that say "thou shalt kill all the infidels". Of course, there's no money in that...
45 posted on 02/22/2006 12:34:39 PM PST by BubbaTheRocketScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

My argument is that Dane would cheer any action by Bush -- ANY action -- and that is an irrefutable position on my part.


46 posted on 02/22/2006 12:46:47 PM PST by Lazamataz (Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
that is an irrefutable position on my part.

On my part, too. And he backs it up with the most dimwitted logic one could possibly come up with.

47 posted on 02/22/2006 2:46:38 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cgk
The Goddess Michelle is clutching at straws here.

Then again, I only come to her threads for the pictures. ;-)

48 posted on 02/22/2006 2:47:51 PM PST by Clemenza (I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

:)


49 posted on 02/22/2006 3:57:48 PM PST by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cgk

Uh or Duh, they just said,on channel 2 news in L.A., the Whitehouse knew nothing about the port deal.


50 posted on 02/22/2006 6:45:59 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgk

(CBS) WASHINGTON If there is one thing Congressional leaders and the White House can agree on, it is that neither knew the port deal with a United Arab Emirates company was even in the works, reports CBS News political analyst Gloria Borger.


http://cbs2.com/topstories/topstories_story_053102937.html


51 posted on 02/22/2006 6:48:57 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk

WOW!!!!!!!!


52 posted on 02/22/2006 7:00:41 PM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dane

How many Islamic terrorists have you killed?


53 posted on 02/22/2006 7:09:46 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Lazamataz

You were the high bidder of the Constitution?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1583539/posts?page=27#27


54 posted on 02/22/2006 7:13:46 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mfnorman
>>>I know that we have the hottest political thinkers on our side but I wonder who the hotties on the liberal side are?


55 posted on 02/22/2006 7:15:23 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

This one?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1582800/posts
Malkin: How the Port Sellout was Financed / Protect our Ports: Steam Builds


56 posted on 02/22/2006 7:16:54 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I have a t-shirt that says:

The Constitution is not
Null and Void
www.freerepublic.com

57 posted on 02/22/2006 7:18:31 PM PST by null and void (Imagine what they would be doing if it wasn't a religion of peace!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: null and void

ROFL!

That is great!


58 posted on 02/22/2006 7:21:23 PM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
The Goddess Michelle is clutching at straws here.

...not the first time she's done that.

She misrepresented those comercials that Armstrong Williams did and she hypocritically went over the top with her criticism about the First Lady and the "Horse Joke".

59 posted on 02/22/2006 10:03:21 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
How many Islamic terrorists have you killed?

None nor do I make claims that I can from writing behind a keyboard(ala michelle malkin).

60 posted on 02/22/2006 11:41:40 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson