Skip to comments.
Bush will veto any bill to stop port deal
AP ALERT
Posted on 02/21/2006 12:32:20 PM PST by Brian Mosely
ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (AP) President Bush says the deal allowing an Arab company to take over six major U.S. seaports should go forward and he will veto any bill that would stop it.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 1handwashestheother; blahblahblah; botsusingtheracecard; buchananbrigade; bushbotsbluedresses; bushbotscirclewagons; bushclintonbushclint; bushsellout; clownposse; coulterwillexplode; d; dontworrybehappy; downfallofbush; dubaidubaidu; dubaidubya; dusappersinatizzy; eternalevil; failedcivicsclass; gameoverman; globalists; homelandsecurity; homosexual; howlermonkeys; howlinbots; howlinmonkeys; howlinsgang; hysteriatrain; ilovekeywords; jorgealbush; kneejerk; kneepadsstat; libtard; masshysteria; moonbatsonparade; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; nonstory; openborderbushbots; pantiesinabunch; ports; ratpackattack; ratpackdunces; religionofports; surrendermonkeys; texasholdem; treason; uae; vetothisbutnotcfr; waronterror; wppff; wsayswhatmeworry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
To: Brian Mosely
To: RegulatorCountry
The Republican Party learned a long time ago to stop asking me for money.
Nor do I work for their candidates, or support them in any way.
My decision, some time ago, has been vindicated over and over again.
102
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:15 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
To: DC Ripper
To: Brian Mosely
Story breaking on Drudge too....not much news at present. Apparently, Pres. Bush issued his statement from Air Force One.
104
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:32 PM PST
by
indcons
To: Brian Mosely
He signed the odious campaign finance reform bill and every lousy spending bill that has been passed in his five years on the job. But he's going to veto this one? Maybe he really is as stupid as his detractors have been saying all these years. Oh well...at least it gives the Republicans a chance to distance themselves from an unpopular president before the fall elections.
To: Brian Mosely
Then our Congress and Senate had better over ride it.
106
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:39 PM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
To: oblomov; All
"Why can't I QUIT you?!"
"Brokeback Compassionate Conservatism"!
107
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:45 PM PST
by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: Tulsa Ramjet; firebrand
Dubai allows for women to dress as they wish and allows for Christians to worship as they please. They have BARS and NIGHTCLUBS that serve alcohol! You can buy the finest wine and food there. Great golfing too.
They also allow for open investment for any American company. Its only fair that we do the same.
I should also mention that is is home to the GREATEST airline in the world:
108
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:51 PM PST
by
Clemenza
(I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked...)
To: All
Bush called the pool back at about 2.30 to issue a very strong defense of port deal... MORE... On port deal he said he would veto any legislation to hold up deal and warned the united states was sending "mixed signals" by going after a company from the middle east when nothing was said when a british company was in charge. Lawmakers, he said, must "step up and explain why a middle eastern company is held to a different standard." Bush, sporting the air force one fight jacket and a tie, was very forceful when he delivered the statement... MORE...
To: antaresequity
Where are all the bushbots? Everything Bush does is great right bushbots? Ol Rush and Hannity can try to help him on this one but Bush is showing his true colors - he is against America defending itself from foreign invaders. I cant believe Im saying this but one has to wonder why are we fighting this war when we are allowing terrorists to walk across our border and control our ports? Bush has proved himself to be a liar when it comes to protecting the homeland.
110
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:58 PM PST
by
sasafras
("Licentiousness destroyes order, and when chaos ensues, the yearning for order will destroy freedom.)
To: Bikers4Bush
I agree. Foolish statement by the President about a "veto", if true. Was Jimmy Carter standing beside him as he spoke?
This issue looks like election year gift from the President to the democrat party.
111
posted on
02/21/2006 12:43:59 PM PST
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: jdm
It appears "The I'm voting for Perot, who's this Justice Ginsburg and Justice Breyer Camp" has already been set up.
112
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:09 PM PST
by
new yorker 77
(Conservatives who eat their own are a liberal's best friend.)
To: hipaatwo
I don't like this ports sale ... it sucks!
113
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:19 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: antaresequity
Isn't it ironic that the socalled imperial president has never vetoed a single bill? Impish, more like.
114
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:26 PM PST
by
Huck
(Roe/Kelo: You have a right to privacy IN your bedroom; you just don't have a right TO your bedroom.)
To: dirtboy
"Makes one wonder what the hell is going on here."
It do, don't it. Something's mighty fishy here, if Bush is threatening to make the only veto in his Presidency over this issue.
Somehow, we're not seeing something in this somewhere. It will emerge, though. It always emerges. Let the leaking begin.
115
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:28 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Brian Mosely
If I was a Democrat, I'd challenge the veto threat. Bush hasn't vetoed one yet.
116
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:35 PM PST
by
ruschpa
To: Bikers4Bush
"Even if he ultimately wins, which I doubt, he will lose significant political face over this." Really, remember CFR? He said he'd sign it if it hit his desk. It did, he signed it and got reelected. Now he's drawn a line in the sand on this issue. After this threat and the Harriet Miers flip-flop he can't back down now.
To: Bikers4Bush; Kenny Bunk
This will be good for House Republicans. They already plan to run against Bush this year on illegal immigration, this will add bonus points.
118
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:38 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: demlosers
True, this could be part of a major quid pro quo that we cannot back out of. If so, then, as usual the White House PR is lousy (unless it's so sensitive that they'd rather take the credibility hit than spill their guts on the goings-on).
119
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:47 PM PST
by
Cyclopean Squid
(History is a work in progress)
To: antaresequity
Pres. Bush is certainly no Reagan. Of course Reagan had to deal with a Dem. HOR.
120
posted on
02/21/2006 12:44:48 PM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 3,061-3,079 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson