The UN's Coming International Code of Unacceptable Speech

Canada Free Press ^ | Tuesday, February 14, 2006 | Joseph Klein

[Anne_Conn]

Last week, I reported on the move by China and its authoritarian-minded cohorts in the General Assembly to stop UN staffers from talking to the press without their approval about matters under investigation that might impact the "reputation" of the United Nations. While that is certainly bad enough if you believe in freedom of the press, it is nothing compared to what the Islamic fanatics are trying to ban--and using the United Nations to do it

[Dr. Thorne]

Please allow me a pre-emptive strike against such restrictions:

The U.N. is a group of no-good, @&%#!!& criminals who should be $#&%)!#@ with a rusty chainsaw previously used to butcher syphilitic swine.

But I mean that in the best possible way.

[ncountylee]

Its one-sided focus emphasized the need to particularly respect Islam and not to link the word Islam with terrorism. The resolution passed despite opposition from many Western countries including the United States.

Same old crap from the same old crap holes.

[D.P.Roberts]

Nicely put.

[Red Badger]

...not to link the word Islam with terrorism.

WE don't. The TERRORISTS do..........

[Old Seadog]

[Big Digger]

How about "We'll stop linking Islam with terrorism, when Islam stops committing and supporting terrorism", and not one nanosecond before.