Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: Democrats May Filibuster To Block Alito
WBEN ^ | January 27, 2006 | Barbara Burns

Posted on 01/27/2006 7:56:53 AM PST by johnmecainrino

Clinton: Democrats May Filibuster To Block Alito Friday, January 27, 2006 07:21 AM - WBEN Newsroom

Buffalo, NY (WBEN) - U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton says being in the minority in Washington, Democrats have few options when they disagree with an issue or an appointment forwarded by republiacns, and that is the case with the nomination of Samuel Alito the U.S. Supreme Corut.

Hearings contiue to day for Alito, and a vote is likely next Tuesday, but Clinton tells WBEN's Barbara Burns her party is considering a filibuster to try to block the expected Alito confirmation.

Clinton says she is opposed to Alito's nomination, but is not sure she supports a filibuster


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; abolishthesenate; alito; alitovote; bringiton; filibuster; makemyday; partysuicide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Never put anything past these dems.

This is the same dem caucus that blocked miguel estrada for 7 months while his wife had a miscarraige.

They blocked good judges like owen and pryor. They still are blocking kavanaugh because he was an aid to starr.

Only dem I trust is Ben Nelson.

Feinstein has already gone back on her no filibuster pledge and now will filibuster.

I wouldn't even be shocked if byrd filibustered. He only stated he would vote for confirmation not to end cloture.

Byrd is the same guy that filibustered owen because of reid and schumer then voted for her after the deal.

Right after the gang of 14 reid got all the dems but ben nelson on record to block kavanaugh.

There are at least 35 no votes, kerry only has to pick up 6 more.

I think Kerry will still fail because dems are saving their ammo for stevens replacement.

1 posted on 01/27/2006 7:56:54 AM PST by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

"..but is not sure she supports a filibuster.."

Not until the latest polls come in...


2 posted on 01/27/2006 7:58:27 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

Looks like a little competition for the moonbats with the kept Ketchup Boy...


3 posted on 01/27/2006 7:59:26 AM PST by eureka! (Hey Lefties and 'Rats: Over 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

Bring it on........it is PAST time to go nuclear in the DC cesspool.


4 posted on 01/27/2006 8:00:00 AM PST by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
A filibuster now would be an over-the-cliff move.

Right now I put the odds at 25%.

5 posted on 01/27/2006 8:01:07 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!

She's a real "centrist" too. as we can see. But the press will be telling us of her "turn to the center" any day now, because she voted not to spend money discovering why ice melts or some such rot.


6 posted on 01/27/2006 8:01:52 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

I've been nervous that the vote on Alito has been put off and I'm extremely annoyed that my senator, Sen. Specter, showed no leadership and allowed it to happen. Yes, I believe that most dems want to hold their fire for the next nomination, but now the presidential hopefuls are feeling forced into making this display. The GOP should never have given them the slightest toehold.


7 posted on 01/27/2006 8:02:16 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
"...Democrats have few options when they disagree with an issue or an appointment forwarded by Republicans..."

Mrs. Clinton, here's a phrase for the day - 'majority rule'. Look it up.
8 posted on 01/27/2006 8:02:30 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
Reid was just interviewed (tape) on FoxNews a few minutes ago. He said they didn't have the votes to filibuster and had no plans to push for it. He sounded as if things will continue on to the Tuesday vote and Alito will be confirmed.

Hillary is a bit late in staking out a position, it seems. Kerry (and Kennedy) have been yelling for filibuster. Now, Hillary seems to be sidling up to that position.
9 posted on 01/27/2006 8:02:31 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
The heat from the dimwits must be excruciating. If they filibuster and the Nuclear Option is invoked, they lose big time. If they don't filibuster, yet cast enough 'nay' votes that could have supported a filibuster, the dimwits will crucify them.

Not a pleasant position to be in IMO. But, to quote George C. Scott's Patton: "...yet I do love it so"! He, he.

10 posted on 01/27/2006 8:02:40 AM PST by bcsco ("The Constitution is not a suicide pact"...A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
I think Kerry will still fail because dems are saving their ammo for stevens replacement.

You are probably right, but it is a stupid move. The Dems better hope neither Buzzy or Stevens don't cash it in before the midterms. The next nominee will most likely be a minority female. There will be hell to pay if the Dems pull that stunt on a Janice Rogers Brown after giving a pass to a couple of white guys.

Actually, filibustering Alito is a lose/lose, while doing the same to the next nominee will be a lose/lose/lose/lose/lose...

IMHO, the Dem presidential wannabes are just posturing to show their base they really wanted to hold up this nomination, but couldn't get the rest of the party to play along.

11 posted on 01/27/2006 8:02:55 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: johnmecainrino

Oh please. Oh please. Oh please. Oh please. Oh please.

Drag this out a few months closer to the mid-terms. Stoopid Democrats...filibusters are for legislation.


13 posted on 01/27/2006 8:03:20 AM PST by ElectricStrawberry (27th Infantry Regiment...cut in half during the Clinton years....Nec Aspera Terrent!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

If they had the votes they would have gone nuclear years ago.

Between the rinos from the northeast, media hound rinos like mccain and hagel, and the old time senile fools like john warner and specter forget about the nuclear optionL

Can we finally stop the lie that you have a majority with 50 seats.

Bush is basically in a minority govt. He can't get anything done without 60 votes. Harry Reid basically controls what bush can do.

Think of all the legislation the dems have blocked. Medical malpractice reform, estate tax, anwr. You can go on an on. Without 60 votes in the senate there is no majority.


14 posted on 01/27/2006 8:03:33 AM PST by johnmecainrino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton says being in the minority in Washington, Democrats have few options when they disagree with an issue or an appointment forwarded by republiacns, and that is the case with the nomination of Samuel Alito the U.S. Supreme Corut.

There never haveing been Senate minorities, apparently, before it happened to the Democrats.

15 posted on 01/27/2006 8:03:35 AM PST by untenured (http://futureuncertain.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

16 posted on 01/27/2006 8:03:46 AM PST by gridlock (It's not really a circus until Teddy Kennedy steps out of the clown car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

The goal posts keep moving for the Dems. Whenever they lose a fight it is because they are saving up for the next one.


17 posted on 01/27/2006 8:04:53 AM PST by babaloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

These libs are pathetic.

They string their defeated base along to the edge of oblivion.

Rotten is clearly desperate to regain her base after showing in polls that she is making ZERO ground among Independents and Republicans.

She is going backwards.


18 posted on 01/27/2006 8:04:53 AM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I think they'll go for it.....the rats don't want him confirmed before the SOTU Tuesday......they are already worried about Bush's swagger...LOL


19 posted on 01/27/2006 8:05:12 AM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
they are already worried about Bush's swagger...LOL

Well dam*. All this time I thought it was the smirk. (chuckle)

20 posted on 01/27/2006 8:06:27 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson