isn't he the guy who served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: Sub-Driver
2 posted on
01/22/2006 11:17:26 AM PST by
golfisnr1
(Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
To: Sub-Driver; HiJinx; Spiff; Da Jerdge; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ..
3 posted on
01/22/2006 11:20:54 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Sub-Driver
isn't he the guy who served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War?
Yes, he served in the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.
4 posted on
01/22/2006 11:21:13 AM PST by
jwh_Denver
(Don't be near Ted Kennedy when his liver explodes.)
To: Sub-Driver
isn't he the guy who served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War?No. He's the guy that went to Vietnam, lied to collect as many medals as fast as he could, then came back home to see how far he could throw them away!
John Kerry's Bad Rap!
5 posted on
01/22/2006 11:21:42 AM PST by
Bommer
(Ted Kennedy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh Johhhnnnny, Helllooooo. You lost the election, lost your claim to fame regarding Viet Nam and your wife lost your last name post election. You're a loser, try to remember that.
6 posted on
01/22/2006 11:23:33 AM PST by
jazusamo
(A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
To: Sub-Driver
Every day, these Democrats make it clearer and clearer just who they support. Kerry touts Al Qaeda's successes in Iraq. Carter calls Hamas "so-called terrorists that at least aren't corrupt."
All Things RightThese people dare call themselves patriots, yet openly support the enemies of America? God help us all if they ever regain power.
7 posted on
01/22/2006 11:24:03 AM PST by
DakotaRed
To: Sub-Driver
He's been smokin' too much weed and drinkin' too much ketchup.
8 posted on
01/22/2006 11:24:16 AM PST by
brwnsuga
(Proud, Black, Conservative!)
To: Sub-Driver
9 posted on
01/22/2006 11:24:44 AM PST by
Beth528
To: Sub-Driver
Seems John's true color (red) is coming out for the whole world to see. What a putz!
10 posted on
01/22/2006 11:26:22 AM PST by
Paige
("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
To: Sub-Driver
...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate...the failed presidential candidate... the failed presidential candidate...
I could go on, but I won't. ;)
11 posted on
01/22/2006 11:26:26 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: Sub-Driver
Kerry is spinning the obvious here. The Flypaper Strategy was supposed to occupy Al Qaeda in Iraq and give Al Qaeda an excuse to have a truce with America on US soil. The strategy calls for the enemy to consistently perceive they have a chance in Iraq (and nowhere else) until well beyond the point at which they have spent most of their resources and good will with the Sunni arab world...and still lose in Iraq.
Kerry is stating the obvious, but as with the Vietnam War, he is spinning it as a "failure" on our part when it is actually a clever victory on our part.
Remember that the main constituency of the Democrats are the American poor and uneducated and the "easily swayed".
With Vietnam, turning China in 1972 was almost the be-all and end-all of American strategic foreign policy in Southeast Asia. It might have been nice to keep Cam Ranh Bay out of Soviet hands after that point, but it wasn't a strategic loss 3 years later when our liberals stabbed us and our allies in the back regarding SE Asia.
But guys like Kerry can just simplisticly point to 58,500 war dead and say "it was all a mistake" and the common brain dead citizen would think "I guess that about sums it up."
To: Sub-Driver
Shout it from the mountain tops, Johnny!Kerry, Dean, and Murtha have been drinking from the same Kool-Aid batch...
13 posted on
01/22/2006 11:27:20 AM PST by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: Sub-Driver
14 posted on
01/22/2006 11:27:53 AM PST by
TigersEye
(All Americans should be armed and dangerous!)
To: Sub-Driver
Memo to John Kerry:
15 posted on
01/22/2006 11:29:21 AM PST by
Richard Kimball
(Look, Daddy! Teacher says every time a Kennedy talks, a Republican gets a house seat!)
To: Sub-Driver
"John Kerry Touts Al Qaida Successes"More deep thoughts from Yale's most formidable D-student.
16 posted on
01/22/2006 11:30:14 AM PST by
melt
(Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
To: Sub-Driver
But Schieffer cautioned that he couldn't be sure whether bin Laden was consciously borrowing from Kerry.Or vice versa.
17 posted on
01/22/2006 11:32:08 AM PST by
Maceman
(Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
To: Sub-Driver; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
"Many people surmise that one of the reasons we haven't been attacked here, is because they are being so successful at doing what they need to do to attack us in Iraq and elsewhere," the failed presidential candidate told ABC's Even if this statement wasn`t so profoundly stupid in its own regards (message to Kerry,we killed some of the top bad guys last week,we are winning as disappointing as that is to you),think about it.
Would Kerry rather have them attacking us here?
What a complete jackass.
18 posted on
01/22/2006 11:36:53 AM PST by
carlr
To: All
Not since W.W.II has the American left supported the United States of America in war. Touting the achievements of another enemy of the U.S.of A. during the Viet Nam war Kerry told a U.S. Senate committee that U.S. forces are worse than the "reds." Yes, Mr. Kerry served and deserved our respect -- right up until he declared his loyalties to the enemy.
Today war is here on our shores. Isn't it time to start thinking about sedition and treason laws?
(What was special about W.W.II? Was it socialist Hitler? No. Our forces were helping defend the left's Uncle Joe's workers' paradise.)
To: Sub-Driver
Kerry- "Many people surmise that one of the reasons we haven't been attacked here, is because they are being so successful at doing what they need to do to attack us in Iraq and elsewhere,"
This actually should be the final nail in the coffin of any Presidential bid Kerry was planning.
This slap to the face of the US Military is a disgrace considering what a hard job in a tough terrain our Troops have, and how bravely they have been doing it.
Many Democrats are reported as not wanting Kerry back on their ticket. If we push hard enough with this, their media might skid and we could get some real traction against this treasonous jerk and put his story to a final ending (politically speaking).
Besides that there should be a group of Iraq Vets, just like the Swifties and do similar commercials against Kerry.
21 posted on
01/22/2006 11:40:02 AM PST by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Sub-Driver
"Many people surmise that one of the reasons we haven't been attacked here, is because they are being so successful at doing what they need to do to attack us in Iraq and elsewhere," the failed presidential candidate told ABC's "This Week."
That is another way of saying we can either fight them over here or over there. I dispute that they are having a lot of success over there, but President's Bush's strategy is correct about taking the way to them on their soil to prevent them from fighting us here.
22 posted on
01/22/2006 11:41:21 AM PST by
Hendrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson