Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a very long 8-page article, and the above is only a brief excerpt.

Reading this article, I felt like freepers have totally succeeded in convincing the Dem Party that Kerry is a loser. So, score another one for FR.
1 posted on 01/21/2006 10:17:03 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

The article also made me realize how difficult it must be to run for office after you've already lost once. Kerry seems to be completely without support yet he has his mind made up to run again. I can not quite follow his logic.


2 posted on 01/21/2006 10:18:47 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Since Kerry and Therayzuh have their money so sheltered that they have never paid their fair share of taxes, I could care less if they spend it all on a hopeless campaign. He is a LOSER and I am sure Therayzuh will point it out to him when he comes running to her for a big check.


5 posted on 01/21/2006 10:22:17 AM PST by Merry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Sorry, but I find it hard to take serious political cues from a men's fashion magazine.
8 posted on 01/21/2006 10:23:43 AM PST by martin_fierro (00111100 00100000 01111100 00111010 00101001 01111110)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
"So, score another one for FR."
Why? Didn't Sun Tzu teach "never prevent or obstruct the enemy's wasteful and self-destructing actions"? Wouldn't it be better if they still thought of him as a possible winner? Then he and hillary would be reciprocally getting in one another's hair - to the hearty cheers and amusement of the whole country.
19 posted on 01/21/2006 10:32:34 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

The article says he filed a form 180 after the election? I didn't hear about that. Is that true? Or are they just making up stuff about it again?


31 posted on 01/21/2006 10:47:30 AM PST by 302damnfast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Yeah, but, we WANT them to nominate a loser.


34 posted on 01/21/2006 10:54:43 AM PST by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
>>But then the Georgetown kids lined up to ask questions, and the pain of it all came rushing back. KerryÂ’s responses were brutally long-winded, as if he were intent on slowly suffocating their earnestness with leaden filibusters. Eyes glazed. Yawns unfolded. Even the kids at the mike shifted their weight impatiently.

We coulda had four years of that. Actually we do still have him till '08, in the Senate...He just won't go away...


37 posted on 01/21/2006 11:05:30 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
Unfit John Kerry is a Maoist, a UN whore, a detached-from-the-people-elite demagogue, a self-entitled aristocRAT, and, (!) AND a Viet Cong war hero! Thank God for his free speech exercise because Kerry's free speech exposes under critical parsing his convoluted thinking process and disordered cognition...as well as his having a strong streak of treasonous ideation. Kerry is a disgraceful American and senator. Here in New England the best that REAL PEOPLE can say about John Kerry is that he is a prime phony.

This despicable Kerry is so unworthy of being a senator for 20 years!!! He consults with named enemies and presumes cabals with international adversary interests. Kerry's anti-free speech mafioso-courtiers attempted threats, extortion, and other oppressive means to prevent any (FREE SPEECH) adverse truthful facts and criticism about John Kerry. John Kerry can buy anything but he cannot buy the infinite TRUTH. AND, furthermore into my rant, Kerry has a *THING* for France's president Chirac! (!wink!wink!) Howard Dean is just insane; John Kerry, who would seek "global consensus" to set policies for America, is a by his very expressed idea proves Kerry is a menace.
40 posted on 01/21/2006 11:12:18 AM PST by purpleland (Elegy 9/11/01 Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
"...and tell your mom I said you kids could all come over and play
in front of my house... if I hadn't had the hydrant removed..."

Image hosting by Photobucket

43 posted on 01/21/2006 11:17:23 AM PST by badgerlandjim (Hillary Clinton is to politics as Helen Thomas is to beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
how obvious it is that the guy Democrats chose to lead them to the promised land is no longer a member of his party’s A-team

It's getting to be like a James Bond movie: "So, Number Two, you have failed." *chair electrocutes Kerry*

45 posted on 01/21/2006 11:20:53 AM PST by denydenydeny ("As a Muslim of course I am a terrorist"--Sheikh Omar Brooks, quoted in the London Times 8/7/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Go, go....go Johnny go...go, go...go Johnny go etc. heh, heh.


50 posted on 01/21/2006 11:32:34 AM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than anyone will ever know. He's A++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Read it yesterday on FR and laughed until I cried. Worth reading again and again, esp. if you're from MA and your Junior Senator is now talking about going to Iraq to try and free that woman journalist...ala Jesse Jackson. Kerry is the most hated man in America...by Dems. Hilarious. No longer a member of the dem A team!!! Will save this article, and the next time I'm feeling depressed about anything..will savor it.


55 posted on 01/21/2006 11:39:46 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

skerry has got to be at least as drunk, stoned, or nuts as his wife is.

Looks like 'Dims Bury their Living, Part 49' to me.


61 posted on 01/21/2006 11:47:56 AM PST by Rightfootforward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Great article.

Seems to me that Kerry is as delusional as Pataki.


70 posted on 01/21/2006 12:59:19 PM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

http://ice.he.net/~freepnet/kerry/index.php?topic=Documents

Call to action!
Please help get this bill passed
AND signed into law
BEFORE the '06 elections!

Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
HR 3352 IH
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h.r.3352:

Call or write your media
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media/

Write every Senator and Representative.

http://www.congress.org/congressorg/directory/congdir.tt?command=congdir

Spread the word far and wide.

This is a no brainer, conservatives control Congress
and the White House




Stolen Valor Act of 2005 (Introduced in House)
HR 3352 IH

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3352

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to protections for the Medal of Honor, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 19, 2005

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to protections for the Medal of Honor, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Stolen Valor Act of 2005'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress finds that--

(1) fraudulent claims surrounding receipt of the Medal of Honor, the Distinguished-Service Cross, the Air Force Cross, the Navy Cross, the Purple Heart, or any other medal or decoration awarded by Congress or the armed forces damage the reputation and meaning of these medals;

(2) Federal law enforcement officers are currently limited in their ability to prosecute fraudulent claims of receipt of military medals; and

(3) changes to the current statute are necessary to allow law enforcement personnel to protect the reputation and meaning of these medals.

SEC. 3. MILITARY MEDAL PROTECTIONS.

Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--

(1) in subsection (a)--

(A) by inserting `purchases, attempts to purchase, solicits for purchase, mails, ships, imports, exports, produces blank certificates of receipt,' after `wears'; and

(B) by inserting `attempts to sell, advertises for sale, trades, barters or exchanges for anything of value' after `sells';

(2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting `or (b)' after `subsection (a)'

(3) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);

(4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

`(b) False Claims About Receipt of Military Medals- Whoever falsely represents himself or herself, verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges awarded to the members of such forces, or the ribbon, button, or rosette of any such badge, decoration or medal, or any colorable imitation thereof shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.'; and

(5) by adding at the end the following:

`(d) Other Medals- If a decoration or medal involved in an offense under subsection (a) or (b) is a Distinguished Service Cross awarded under Section 3742 of title 10, an Air Force Cross awarded under section 8742 of section 10, a Navy cross awarded under section 6242 of title 10, a silver star awarded under section 3746, 6244, or 8746 of title 10, or a Purple Heart awarded under section 1129 of title 10, or any replacement or duplicate medal as authorized by statute, in lieu of the punishment provided in that subsection, the offender shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.'.



"From Ray Funderburk, MOPH

The greatest threat to the sanctity and significance of the Purple Heart comes from the medal's easy availability. Anyone can buy one at flea markets, pawnshops or on the Internet, where Web sites offer the decoration, no questions asked, for as little as $35. An accompanying certificate on onion skin parchment and personalized with your name and any rank you choose costs about $25.

Such commerce in the symbols of American courage and sacrifice would be outlawed by a measure spearheaded last July by Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo.

His "Stolen Valor Act" would make it a federal crime to falsely wear the Purple Heart and other top military decorations, or to even list them on a resume if they were not officially earned.

But the proposed bill now sits in the House Judiciary Committee, and its fate remains unclear.
"We're waiting for the committee to act," said Salazar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1560750/posts?page=2#2




Any Republican or Democrat politicians who don't get this bill passed is
as guilty as the phonies that this bill targets.

The Swift Boat Vets already proved, beyond a doubt,
that hanoi kerry's 1st Purple Heart is fraudulent.

A US Attorney General can get ALL of hanoi kerry's
records and once and for all prove that the
Swift Boat Vets were accurate and true.

All that has to be done is to get this bill passed and signed into law now, before the '06 election.

Since hanoi kerry will be under indictment he'll
have to sit out the '06 election for his illegal seat
in the US Senate.

AND the best part is that it is a Democrat sponsored
bill that will his downfall.

COSPONSORS(60), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)

Rep Baca, Joe [CA-43] - 7/27/2005
Rep Baird, Brian [WA-3] - 7/28/2005
Rep Barrow, John [GA-12] - 7/27/2005
Rep Beauprez, Bob [CO-7] - 9/6/2005
Rep Berry, Marion [AR-1] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boren, Dan [OK-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boswell, Leonard L. [IA-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Boyd, Allen [FL-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Calvert, Ken [CA-44] - 9/6/2005
Rep Cardoza, Dennis A. [CA-18] - 7/27/2005
Rep Case, Ed [HI-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Chandler, Ben [KY-6] - 7/27/2005
Rep Cooper, Jim [TN-5] - 7/27/2005
Rep Costa, Jim [CA-20] - 7/28/2005
Rep Cramer, Robert E. (Bud), Jr. [AL-5] - 7/27/2005
Rep Cuellar, Henry [TX-28] - 7/27/2005
Rep Davis, Geoff [KY-4] - 7/26/2005
Rep Davis, Lincoln [TN-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51] - 7/26/2005
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. [TX-20] - 7/29/2005
Rep Green, Gene [TX-29] - 7/28/2005
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7] - 7/26/2005
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V. [IL-4] - 7/28/2005
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 7/26/2005
Rep Herseth, Stephanie [SD] - 7/27/2005
Rep Hinojosa, Ruben [TX-15] - 7/28/2005
Rep Holden, Tim [PA-17] - 7/27/2005
Rep Honda, Michael M. [CA-15] - 7/28/2005
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Kline, John [MN-2] - 7/28/2005
Rep Lewis, Ron [KY-2] - 7/28/2005
Rep Marshall, Jim [GA-3] - 11/2/2005
Rep Matheson, Jim [UT-2] - 7/26/2005
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 9/7/2005
Rep McIntyre, Mike [NC-7] - 9/14/2005
Rep Meek, Kendrick B. [FL-17] - 7/26/2005
Rep Melancon, Charlie [LA-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Menendez, Robert [NJ-13] - 10/6/2005
Rep Michaud, Michael H. [ME-2] - 7/27/2005
Rep Moore, Dennis [KS-3] - 7/27/2005
Rep Musgrave, Marilyn N. [CO-4] - 10/17/2005
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. [CA-38] - 7/27/2005
Rep Northup, Anne M. [KY-3] - 9/15/2005
Rep Ortiz, Solomon P. [TX-27] - 7/28/2005
Rep Peterson, Collin C. [MN-7] - 7/27/2005
Rep Pomeroy, Earl [ND] - 7/27/2005
Rep Reyes, Silvestre [TX-16] - 7/27/2005
Rep Rogers, Harold [KY-5] - 9/7/2005
Rep Ross, Mike [AR-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Ryan, Tim [OH-17] - 7/26/2005
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29] - 7/27/2005
Rep Serrano, Jose E. [NY-16] - 7/29/2005
Rep Strickland, Ted [OH-6] - 9/27/2005
Rep Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6] - 9/6/2005
Rep Tanner, John S. [TN-8] - 7/27/2005
Rep Taylor, Gene [MS-4] - 7/27/2005
Rep Thompson, Mike [CA-1] - 7/27/2005
Rep Udall, Mark [CO-2] - 7/22/2005
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12] - 7/28/2005
Rep Whitfield, Ed [KY-1] - 9/20/2005

There is no valid reason why this bill can't pass both Houses of Congress
and be signed by President Bush
BEFORE the '06 elections.

http://johnkerryads.websiteanimal.com/

http://www.frontsteps.com/movies/john_kerrys_bad_rap/

Rove Credits Swiftvets With 'Energizing' Bush Vote (Thank You Karl Rove!)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1345603/posts


93 posted on 01/23/2006 7:57:04 AM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (The "Politically Correct RINO's" on Free Republic are never really political or correct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

Now if we can influence their decision on Hillary...


94 posted on 01/23/2006 7:59:46 AM PST by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer
"Among former Kerry staffers, thereÂ’s particular anger over his refusal during the campaign to release his complete military record, which fueled conspiracy theories and made it nearly impossible to shoot them down. After the election, Kerry finally agreed to release everything. Reporters—and his aides—were stunned to find there was nothing to hide." Really? What about Form-180?
95 posted on 01/23/2006 8:10:46 AM PST by toddlintown (Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer; Grampa Dave; Marine_Uncle

Thanks for posting this article,


101 posted on 11/01/2006 10:29:47 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; Fedora; ..

"You don't value families if you force them to take up a collection to buy body armor for a son or daughter in the service, if you deny veterans health care, or if you tell middle class families to wait for a tax cut, so that the wealthiest among us can get even more." -- Transcript of John Kerry 2004 acceptance speech, http://www.postgazette.com/pg/04212/354246.stm

He brought up this body armor issue again in defense of his reprehensible remarks two days ago, despite the fact that he'd voted against paying for body armor before he made the speech in 2004! Either he's stupid, or he thinks listeners are stupid, and judging from the October 30 gaffe, it's likely that it's both. And let's not forget...

1998: Kerry calls for ground troops to topple Saddam; Clinton not tough enough
The Boston Globe | February 23, 1998 | Aaron Zitner, Globe Staff
Posted on 06/20/2004 9:29:57 AM PDT by nwrep
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1156895/posts


102 posted on 11/01/2006 10:37:15 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Dhimmicrati delenda est! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: summer

I'm not sure we want to tell the slimy surrender side what's good for them.
I say: run Kerry run! Go boy!


109 posted on 11/01/2006 7:06:31 PM PST by eleni121 ("Show me just what Mohammed brought:: evil and inhumanity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson