Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran - Tehran plans nuclear weapon test by March
United Press International (excerpt) ^ | January 19, 2005

Posted on 01/19/2006 8:33:14 PM PST by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: HAL9000
Any news on what the SSMs being moved nightly are tipped with? Iran was rumored to have bought tac nukes from the Central Asian Muslim states in the early 90s.
21 posted on 01/19/2006 9:13:33 PM PST by Lejes Rimul (I was right about Iraq all along. Told you so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Tehran is planning a nuclear weapons test before the Iranian New Year on March 20, 2006..."

Not a chance.

22 posted on 01/19/2006 9:14:10 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

This story is definitely worth waiting for FR to come up.


23 posted on 01/19/2006 9:14:46 PM PST by steve86 (PRO-LIFE AND ANTI-GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

That's great! We have some tests of our own we've been needing to conduct.


24 posted on 01/19/2006 9:15:41 PM PST by Defiant (Dar al Salaam will exist when the entire world submits to American leadership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator
I am not convinced that Iran hasn't had a weapon for some time now.

That would explain their recent inexplicable yapping.

No, but it would explain Jacque Chirac's sudden attack of balls. Condi or someone similar clued him in that Iran actually has a nuke.

Bush is just ironing out contingency plans before taking them out...

...err, that's Iran I mean, not France ;-)

Cheers!

25 posted on 01/19/2006 9:16:08 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

I hope that Israeli citizens are wearing their hard hats.

Seriously, we really need to take these crazies out.........


26 posted on 01/19/2006 9:18:01 PM PST by Radix (Welcome home 3 ID!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I know the CIA says publicly they are years away...but you have to wonder what they REALLY think.
27 posted on 01/19/2006 9:18:23 PM PST by steve86 (PRO-LIFE AND ANTI-GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
...err, that's Iran I mean, not France ;-)

Iran. France. What's the difference?

28 posted on 01/19/2006 9:20:10 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BearWash

Years away? lol No freakin way.

Iran has the links to get nukes. It is just a matter of whether or not someone gave them the weapons.

I am sure Iran already has some sort of weapon...whether a full nuke or not is the question.


29 posted on 01/19/2006 9:20:49 PM PST by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
I am not convinced that Iran hasn't had a weapon for some time now.

I agree with that assessment. I think the problem with the MAD Iranians is that they are not sure what to do with it and they are afraid to try to set it off without Western (traitorious) assistance.

30 posted on 01/19/2006 9:23:58 PM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
"I know the CIA says publicly they are years away...but you have to wonder what they REALLY think."

There seems to be an assumption being made by many media analysts - and the media that parrots what they think - that Iran is several years away from producing a nuclear weapon. What they repeatedly fail to take into account is the high probability that the Paki guy (whose name I forget at the moment) gave/sold the necessary technology/material to the Mullahs to "kick start" their program. In other words, Iran could very well be only months away from going nuclear.

My own guess is that the clock is quickly approching midnight faster than the public is being led to believe. The recent actions and rhetoric out of the Europeans of all people help to reinforce this theory.
31 posted on 01/19/2006 9:24:53 PM PST by Skywarner (The U.S. Armed Forces... Producers of FREEDOM for over 200 years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: houeto

They could be baiting Israel.


32 posted on 01/19/2006 9:25:18 PM PST by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jneesy
if theres a bomb there israel will let us know....right quick like

bunny...pancake...head

ferst time i seen sumbody moor rednek trhen me

33 posted on 01/19/2006 9:27:24 PM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

FLASH: Israel plans several nuclear tests on foreign soil in February.


34 posted on 01/19/2006 9:28:30 PM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
"I am sure Iran already has some sort of weapon...whether a full nuke or not is the question."

Then maybe it's time to teach them what a full nuclear weapon will do.

35 posted on 01/19/2006 9:28:42 PM PST by blackbart.223 (I live in Northern Nevada. Reid doesn't represent me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
They could be baiting Israel.

Man, Israel doesn't 'bait' very well. They tend to consider things quite seriously.

36 posted on 01/19/2006 9:31:43 PM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: griffin
“Oh rats. We're too late. No need for air strikes. Too dangerous - too late. Iran might get mad. I guess we're supposed to be shakin' in our boots?

If I had a little less conviction that the Iranians would use them or a bit more that we would, this statement wouldn’t bother me.

37 posted on 01/19/2006 9:32:23 PM PST by SouthParkRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

BTTT


38 posted on 01/19/2006 9:32:36 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223

well this is a fine kettle o fish...could be the devastation we avoided in the cold war...though i don't think the cold war ever ended...kgbputin and all, 5th column U.S. leftists assisting islamofascists..this is God's country and the devil must destroy it...if we get hit hard i hope we take the rest of the world with us...i mean that...the whole enchillada.....f with us


39 posted on 01/19/2006 9:34:38 PM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

But, but, but, but STATE says years, don't they?


40 posted on 01/19/2006 9:34:52 PM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson