Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Super-powerful new ion engine revealed
New Scientist Space ^ | 01/18/06 | Emma Young

Posted on 01/18/2006 5:29:02 PM PST by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: KevinDavis

I've seen that somewhere before, but can't quite remember where.

21 posted on 01/18/2006 6:01:22 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

What could you do if you employed gravity assists around Jupiter with the use of an ion engine?


22 posted on 01/18/2006 6:01:45 PM PST by BobDobbs9911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
And what do they do with the compensating negative charges? Positive ions are expelled out, but they cannot keep accumulating the electrons in the craft.

They just have to make sure the ship touches a doorknob every couple million miles.

23 posted on 01/18/2006 6:01:52 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

It is a pretty blue hue in the blackness of space.


24 posted on 01/18/2006 6:02:38 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

This stuff is always ten years away. I won't hold my breath.


25 posted on 01/18/2006 6:02:40 PM PST by warpcorebreach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanDave

It deodorizes outer space.


26 posted on 01/18/2006 6:02:54 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Six weeks! No way, dude! Do you have a link on that?


27 posted on 01/18/2006 6:03:05 PM PST by BobDobbs9911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88; All

That is true... Instead of 6 months to Mars.. It would be shorter...


28 posted on 01/18/2006 6:04:04 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

What G-forces would be generated on such a trip?


29 posted on 01/18/2006 6:04:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Put one in Earth orbit to clean up the atmosphere!


30 posted on 01/18/2006 6:05:00 PM PST by AmericanDave (More COWBELL....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Actually, almost none in terms of G-forces. Remember, the acceleration from an ion rocket is not one big initial acceleration, but a slow constant acceleration over weeks at a time.


31 posted on 01/18/2006 6:07:24 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Gosh, I wish I were smarter,,,lol,,,thanks for the ping


32 posted on 01/18/2006 6:08:42 PM PST by meanie monster (http://guptonator.myvideochat.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Why don't they combine an ion engine with the nuke capability of spacecraft that have plutonium generators? The mission to Pluto would be perfect for it!


33 posted on 01/18/2006 6:09:35 PM PST by BobDobbs9911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SirKit

Ping


34 posted on 01/18/2006 6:12:45 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobDobbs9911; All

Never mind Pluto, I prefer Alpha Centauri...


35 posted on 01/18/2006 6:12:49 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Remember, the acceleration from an ion rocket is not one big initial acceleration, but a slow constant acceleration over weeks at a time.

Correct.

36 posted on 01/18/2006 6:15:16 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
"We're givin' ya' all she's got, captain!"
37 posted on 01/18/2006 6:48:33 PM PST by manwiththehands (The only politician worse than a crooked democRat is a crooked Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Well, except that the thrust is tiny. Don't look for ion engines to lift a vehicle off the surface of the earth into outer space.


38 posted on 01/18/2006 6:48:55 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobDobbs9911

Because the RTG generators doesn't generate enough power for the ion engine to work properly. You need a real nuclear reactor so enough ions can be generated for a larger spacecraft on a long flight.


39 posted on 01/18/2006 6:56:04 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BobDobbs9911

You don't generate more 'time', you generate more thrust with the same amount of fuel. A jet engine keeps an aircraft aloft by simply expanding the air by 15% due to the heat created by combustion. Cold air is sucked into the jet engine, jet fuel is burned, and hot air is exhausted. The hot air is ~15% greater in volume, due to the increase in temperature.

Hence, the goal in jet fuel is to create a slow burning (so it heats the air, instead of simply exploding) fuel that burns very hot.

Depending upon the fuel used, the ionization may increase an atom's diameter by a large amount (Hydrogen) or a small amount (kerosene). You are only moving the outter electron orbits up a level or two. All you have to do is run some current through some conductors on the nozzle.

Naturally, some exotic fuels will have very low atomic weight fuels, such that the benefits are larger. Increasing the diameter of Carbon (for example) would produce less than a 1% increase in the atom's size; where as elements with very small atomic masses would increase more.

Remember High School Chemistry/Physics. There are 7 Electron orbits, each with a series of sub-orbits (S, P, D and F). Hydrogen has 1 electron, which is normally at rest in the 1S shell. By exciting the Hydrogen, the electron bumps from the 1S to the 1P shell. Thus, the Hydrogen atom is now LARGER, in that the 1P shell is further away from the nucleas. This excitation can be accomplished by heat, or imparting energy through a magnetic field. Thus, as you get to larger and more complex atoms, the size increase you get from ionizing them is not as significant.

Some of the early ionization engines consisted simply of Hydrogen in a pressurized container (think spray bottle). This spray was vented out a nozzle. In space, it doesn't require a whole lot of thrust to move stuff around; they found that by (temporarily) routing the batteries through windings on the nozzle; the Hydrogen ionized, and they got significantly more thrust from the same amount of Hydrogen.

Obviously, things have moved forward quite a bit in the past 25+ years.


40 posted on 01/18/2006 7:51:52 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson