[Aussie Dasher]

I feel ill!

[b4its2late]

[RockinRight]

My a$$.

I don't buy it for one minute.

[mystery-ak]

[lexington minuteman 1775]

Meanwhile today, WH spokesperson Scott McClellend announced that GW will seek a run in 2008 saying that "He realizes that the Democrats were right and he stole the 2000 election, so that 2008 will be his official second term."
Leading Democratic canidates were so busy having an orgasmic adreniline dump could no longer be reached for comment. /sarcasm on/made up whole thing if you want me to source it.LOL!

[Giant Conservative]

Defeatism is the primary weapon used within an organization in an effort to weaken it. In this case, clearly some are seeking to make a Hilary Presidency a self-fulfilling prophecy. In actuality, she's the worst big-name candidate the Democrats could run. So long as the GOP nominates a man of principle, he will win.

[eyespysomething]

I just heard a clip of her screeching at a MLK Jr event. People will not vote to listen to that for 4 years.

Shallow? Yes. But I am sure of that.

[JoeGar]

It's unlikely that a Senator will win the Presidency. However, if I had to bet on a Senator, it would be on George Allen of Virgina.

[Toespi]

Typical liberal BS, nothing different. Put the spin out there, truth or not, then look forward to a percentage of the sheeples, going for it.

[reagan_fanatic]

What a pantload.

Hillary has about as much a chance of being elected President as Ted kennedy does.

[EagleUSA]

This is just as bad and phony as the Gina Davis TV show...

[wjersey]

Remember the MSM had Dean as the next president

[farlander]

This has got to be the most BS I've ever seen in a single article. What a load of bull. Did I mention this is crap ?

[sauropod]

"White House strategists" are the main problem!

[xzins]

The republican candidate most likely to win in 2008 against Hillary:

1. It must be someone who already has ready and willing support from the alternative media....Fox, Talk Radio, Blog, Internet, Church

2. It must be someone who already has a name-recognition that rivals that of Hillary -- there can be no time wasted on building a name and reputation.

3. It must be someone extremely proficient in front of a camera and microphone.


A. Dick Cheney
B. John McCain
C. Condi Rice
D. Rudi Giulianni
E. Allen
F. Frist
G. Gingrich
H.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

All the more reason to see to it that the 100 pages of Hillary references are restored to the Barrett Report.

[Cicero]

This is an odd article for Insight, which is generally conservative and associated with the Washington Times.

[dougd]

the "senior republican advisor close to the WH" smells to me like Kristol - more of his delusions of intelligence, political wisdom and that he even matters.

[SandRat]

Whom ever the author is

I'm trying to see your point of view.

[Uncle Hal]

This is pure BS.

[A CA Guy]

You bring up Hillary's attempt to take over American medicine with a socialized medicine.

You have to boldly get into how her husband allowed China to gain technology for Chinese rockets and guidance systems that created a breach in national security. Now China can nuke any city in the USA, before at most they could accidentally lob a missile to Alaska.

Then there is her famous "WE WILL TAKE THINGS FROM YOU SPEECH".

In truth, Hillary should lose with any real effort against her.

How about her husband's wire tapping everything while not at war with Echelon(sp)?