Posted on 01/13/2006 5:38:54 AM PST by OXENinFLA
5th & Final Day of Hearings
This morning, the Senate Judiciary Cmte. convenes for a final session in the nomination hearings of Judge Samuel Alito. Outside witnesses who did not testify at yes- terday's hearings are given an opportunity to offer their opinions on the nominee. The Cmte. meets again to vote, either to approve or reject, on Tues., Jan. 17
FRI., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN
Live Links
Not when I watched it.
I watch C-Span all day everyday.
Liberals say they are biased too.
Keeping Up Appearances
My parents love that show on PBS.
I forgot. Oil money and Daddy's influence.
LOL
Platform flip-flops for the dressy occasion
I am too. I'm bummed out. I was really hoping they would bring him forth and show liberalism in it's unmasked and unhinged style.
Makin me laugh... my husband actually watches that !
Mutual funds? Insurance policies? Securities?
...must...stay...awake...
...eyes rolling back...brain cells beginning to fry...
Assistant Professor is the entry level position leading to Associate and then Full Professor. In many colleges you need to have completed Post Doctoral work. Of course at some colleges they will take someone with a Master's. It depends on the competitiveness of the university.
I think I should get Robin's job, don't you?
They're holding him in reserve just in case John Paul Stevens kicks the bucket between now and the end of the Bush administration.
You need to save the best for last.
Mostly. It is the LAST day of the hearings. TG.
Orrin Hatch is going to come down big time on this Flym.
Yeah, it's just too easy...these people are caricatures.
It might have made the highlight reel. C-SPAN plans to show highlights all weekend.
Oh my......ROFL
Amanda Frost
Assistant Professor of Law
Curriculum Vitae
Degrees & Universities
J.D., Harvard Law School, 1997
A.B., Harvard College, 1993
Representative Professional Activities & Achievements
Certifying Questions to Congress
Presentation at 2005 Southeastern Association of Law Schools conference. Hilton Head, S.C., July 20, 2005.
Developing a Winning Rulemaking Strategy
Panelist at the ABA.s Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice conference entitled: Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Institute; Making Agency Law Through Rulemaking. Washington, D.C., April 8, 2005.
Litigated cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, federal district courts, and state supreme courts while a staff attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group.
Served as a consultant to the Shanghai Municipal Government in drafting open government legislation, sponsored by the China Law Center, Yale Law School. Washington, D.C., May 2003.
Awarded a Fulbright fellowship to study administrative law reform in the European Union
Presented article entitled "Restoring Faith in Government: Transparency Reform in the United States and the European Union" at "Colloque sur Gouvernance et Identités en Europe," sponsored by the Sorbonne, Universite Paris I. Paris, France, December 2001.
Conferee, Symposium on National Security and Open Government, sponsored by The Brookings Institution. Washington, D.C., May 2002.
Publications
Keeping Up Appearances: A Process-Oriented Approach to Judicial Recusals, 53 Kansas L. Rev. 531 (2005).
Restoring Faith in Government: Transparency Reform in the United States and the European Union, 9 European Public Law 87 (March 2003).
Judicial Review of FDA Preemption Determinations, 54 Food Drug Law Journal 367 (1999).
When first hired as a professor the title is assistant professor. It is a little misleading because it is not in any way an "assistant" type position. It is a full-time teaching position same as a full professor. They have to be promoted to "Associate Professor" and again to "Professor" which usually corresponds to higher pay. The time it takes to be promoted can vary, but typically:
Assistant Professor = Years 1-5
Associate Professor = Years 6-10
Professor = Years 11-30
I'm actually disappointed and embarrassed for them. I was looking forward to today... good debate. This is so pathetic that I can't understand why they even bothered.
Have any of the DemocRAT witnesses had any dealings with Judge Alito, or are they just media hearsay witnesses?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.