Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Townhall.com is my second favorite site and I found this on the home page. Even the liberals are tired of these democrats. When are they going to learn? When we have 435-0 majority in the house and 100-0 majority in the Senate? I doubt even then they will learn.
1 posted on 01/12/2006 10:57:38 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: napscoordinator
"As a liberal, what scares me is not the prospect of having Sam Alito on the Supreme Court; what scares me is the way my fellow liberal Democrats are behaving in response to the nomination. I’m appalled and embarrassed by the fear mongering, the personal attacks and what I see as an irresponsible and misleading distortion of his real judicial record as well as his character. Now the threat of a filibuster lurks, and Senator Kennedy’s tirade about documents being concealed seems like little more than a pretext to justify such a threat. "

What rock has this guy been hiding under?

This is a routine strategy with the Demoncrats.
2 posted on 01/12/2006 11:00:23 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Excellent.

However, this writer scares me. Me thinks she is too smart to be a real liberal.


4 posted on 01/12/2006 11:06:22 AM PST by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Hey, Kennedy. Stop drinking long enough to listen to this lady.


5 posted on 01/12/2006 11:07:06 AM PST by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
I read this on powerline earlier today, intersesting piece.

I think Alito is pretty much a lock right now anyway. The confirmation is his to lose.
7 posted on 01/12/2006 11:08:24 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Learn from the past, don't live in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
The MoveOn moonbats will blow her wise advise off and call her a Carl Rove plant.

It's so much fun watching them self destruct.

8 posted on 01/12/2006 11:09:35 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
She's got a point...Better for them wait to raise hell for a real idealogical shift when W replaces Ginsburg with ___(fill in blank)___.
9 posted on 01/12/2006 11:09:41 AM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

....a lone voice crying in the wilderness........


10 posted on 01/12/2006 11:11:01 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

The Democrats are receiving lobby money to repeat such gibberish(especially Schummer, Kennedy and Feinstein). They must not have worked hard on their arguments and questions or they are too incompetent to present a useful dialogue and debate. Democrat Senators blew it!


15 posted on 01/12/2006 11:23:38 AM PST by Revererdrv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Any questioning by the drunken sot, woman killer Kennedy is meaningless. The bloodthirsty Dums (Pro DEATH, abortion/euthanasia) mindnumbingly offensive. If I were an artist I would draw a picture of the Sinator, with horns and blood dripping from the mouths and hands of the evil Dums.


18 posted on 01/12/2006 11:25:44 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

This author confirms that Alito is not conservative enough... How about JRB?

http://www.neoperspectives.com/janicerogersbrown.htm


22 posted on 01/12/2006 11:31:29 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

I'd rather if Suzie had just kept her mouth shut.

A liberal agrees with Alito's nomination, and one as flaming as this?

It depresses and concerns me.

Then again, maybe she's just an idiot. Not to hard to believe that given her leftist "credentials".


25 posted on 01/12/2006 11:36:16 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Susan Sullivan is upset because she personally knows for a fact that they are telling lies about Alito, but when the next guy/gal comes along that she does not personally know she will go right back to believing the lies they tell.


30 posted on 01/12/2006 11:53:22 AM PST by Chesterbelloc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
The writer objects on tactical grounds what she should be condemning on moral grounds, and argues her self into the conclusion that her own view of conservatives is refuted by all the empirical evidence she holds -- then fails to notice the force of her own logic.

The typical articulate incoherence one expects from the liberal mind. 2+2=5, in polysyllables.

34 posted on 01/12/2006 12:00:48 PM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

"These include pro-choice decisions that affirmed and applied Roe v. Wade, as well as cases favoring plaintiffs bringing discrimination suits, cases that ruled in favor of criminal defendants, or a case that expanded a women's rights to seek political asylum on the basis of gender. These are just not the results you would expect to see if he were a conservative ideologue."

sounds more like she doesn't understand conservatives.

she got a glimpse of one working with Alito obviously, liked what she saw, yet still refuses to see the light.

a conservative ideologue does not include oppressing others.


35 posted on 01/12/2006 12:01:30 PM PST by kpp_kpp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Hey, can someone try to post this over at DU? I'm curious to see if it ever sees the light of day.


42 posted on 01/12/2006 12:20:34 PM PST by ExpatCanuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
"I consider myself a social progressive. I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU and a liberal pro-choice advocate who supports abortion rights. I favor gun control, support gay marriage and oppose the death penalty. I also don't have a problem if you want to take "God" out of the Pledge of Allegiance."

In short, this statement sums up the entire RAT-bastard position: Paraphrasing really says it all: "I am a card-carrying member of the American Communist party, and a pro choice advocate who favors unlimited baby murder, the freeing of all prison imnmates (since, after all, society made them do it) no choice for those who want the best means for self defense, an unlimited and all-powerful central government which controls all wealth with the state assuming the roles of god, parents, and the final arbiter of all human behavior"

This person sums up why I am a conservative. The Republic is in the throes of a civil war; some call it the Culture War. We may already have "progressed" too far down the road to total socialism for there to be a peaceful resolution of the differences between "us and them". I pray that it is not too late.

43 posted on 01/12/2006 12:25:32 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Nice try Susan but I don't think you're going to split Repulicans on Judge Alito. You are obviously smart enough to know that these personal attacks are the left's only hope for the SC. And you can't be oblivious to the fact that a non-ideological strict constructionist would have to vote, far more often than not, to block the agenda you hold so dear. Your leftist views are as antithetical to the principles of our Constitution as they can be.


44 posted on 01/12/2006 12:28:26 PM PST by TigersEye (All Americans should be armed and dangerous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Nah they'll still be wanting committee votes and revotes and revotes and revotes and revotes.

Let 'em talk, the more they talk the more they minimize themselves.


46 posted on 01/12/2006 12:31:29 PM PST by Leatherneck_MT (An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator

Maybe this liberal will start taking a look at the justifications used to support many of the other things lists as supporting. They're just as hollow as the attacks on Alito. The justicication rely on just as many lies and misrepresentations.


49 posted on 01/12/2006 12:48:13 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: napscoordinator
In all candor, I expect that if I did not know Judge Alito, I may have responded to the nomination with the same distrust, fear and suspicion with which I usually respond to everything the Bush administration does,

So, they distrust & fear everything the Bush administration does, but just this one time, he did the right thing? Do they now want to reevaluate Bush? Does it occur to them to question the tactics that have been used to paint him as eviiiil?

57 posted on 01/12/2006 1:18:24 PM PST by DejaJude (Admiral Clark said, "Our mantra today is life, liberty and the pursuit of those who threaten it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson