Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Samuel Alito ~ Senate Judiciary Hearing [LIVE THREAD] (Day-4)
Senate Judiciary ^ | 1-12-06 | Senate Judiciary

Posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:27 AM PST by OXENinFLA

Day 4: Hearing Resumes

This morning, Senators will question Judge Alito during a third round. They will then go into a closed session, to review the FBI background investigation on the Supreme Court nominee. Outside witnesses may be called to testify this afternoon, as well as the American Bar Association, to discuss its recommendations.

THURS., 9:00AM ET, C-SPAN

Live Links

C-span

Judiciary LIVE LINK

FEDNET

CapitolHearings.org


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitoakbar; alitohearings; alitorulz; babykilling; bidenisamoron; bush2rats0; clangingcymbals; demsareduds; emptybarrels; feingoldstinks; feinsteinreeks; judicialnominees; judiciary; kennedysucks; penumbra; scotus; senate; super; superdeduper; superduper; superduperduper; welldecided
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,601-2,6202,621-2,6402,641-2,660 ... 3,401-3,406 next last
To: xsmommy

could he do that?


2,621 posted on 01/12/2006 1:56:17 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2618 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Here's what I have

4:55: Sessions points out that Congress messed up Rybar, not Alito. Laughter (agreement?) in the room. Sessions is asking whether or not throwing rocks at people is a federal crime.

4:53: Senator Sessions remarks that Alito's civil rights opinions have almost always been unanimous.

4:53: Senator Durbin is up and agrees with Senator Leahy on the inappropriateness of questioning sitting judges. Senator DeWine has no questions for the panel.

4:50: Senator Kyl is asking for clarification on the 3rd Circuit's policy of distributing 3-judge panel opinions to the whole court. Not every Circuit does this.

Judge Scirica is clarifying. They only circulate precedential opinions, or non-precedential opinions with a dissent. Therefore precedential opinions are sent to the court twice - before and after publication.

Kyl is asking what happens if a Judge disagrees on the initial circulation. The Judge can write to the opinion writer or the entire court expressing his/her disagreement.

4:47: Senator Leahy is up. Senator Leahy points out that Alito will have to rule on the decisions of some of the current judges on the panel. Rather than create a difficult for the judges if Alito is confirmed he is not going to avail himself of the chance to ask questions of the panel.


2,622 posted on 01/12/2006 1:56:39 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2581 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

I,m sorry, Sessions is making that point.


2,623 posted on 01/12/2006 1:56:45 PM PST by rwa265 (The Promises of the Lord, I Will Proclaim Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2613 | View Replies]

To: Elpasser

I would say that I would love for Roe v. Wade to be overturned. I think it was unconstitutional and should never have existed. But I don't know what your point is. If the constitution is applied, this will come to be overturned at some point. And I'm sure that Judge Alito will base his decisions on the law and the constitution.


2,624 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:06 PM PST by ilovew ("We are living through a watershed moment in the story of freedom." GWB 12-14-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2596 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

This past July my youngest granddaughter was born.. stillborn. When I was trying to help them with her funeral arrangements I talked to a funeral director back home that called my sweet granddaughter a FETUS. She wasn't a FETUS to me, she was a baby, a girl baby, my granddaughter, she has a name. This abortion thing is really bothering me and I am sick to death of hearing about a "womans right to choose" and "reproductive rights" from DiFi and Schumer and Kennedy, etc.


2,625 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:19 PM PST by Lovergirl (Yes! It's true. I am a SnowFlake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2566 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Peach

Cornyn's addressing the criticism right now


2,626 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:24 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2605 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
It wouldn't take too much to put the Orca over the edge, would it?
2,627 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:27 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2618 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

no reason they could not appear. the only reason the dems are squawking about this UNPRECEDENTED panel, is that they weren't the ones able to put one together for one of their candidates first. xshub says arlen has performed admirably in organizing this, and he is NOT an arlen fan.


2,628 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:35 PM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2621 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I am embarrassed that so many Senators could not take time out of their busy (?) schedule to listen to these men and women who traveled to support their colleague.

Disgraceful conduct on the part of nearly all of them.


2,629 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:45 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2591 | View Replies]

To: Chuck54
I think all are active but two. I'm not sure if the judge that was there via satellite is retired or not.
2,630 posted on 01/12/2006 1:57:46 PM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2602 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
Biden's earlier suggestion that hearings of this sort should be scrapped was, to me, tantamount to surrender.

Leahy's refusal to ask questions of the judges strikes me similarly.

These strike me as the wailing of spoiled little brats who got picked to be on the losing team in a neighborhood scratch baseball game. Since they lost, they're picking up their bats and balls and going home.

2,631 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:05 PM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2597 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Leahy said something about them not being able to tell the truth though!


2,632 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:05 PM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2622 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

one of the biggest mysteries in life is how that bloated sot hasn't stroked out to date.


2,633 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:15 PM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2627 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

Cornyn just slammed Leahy and Durbin.


2,634 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:30 PM PST by ladtx ("It is fatal to enter any war without the will to win it." -- -- General Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2630 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

Can we put DU on suicide watch or is this thing still up in the air?


2,635 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:31 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Resistance is futile. We are the Freepers. You will be assimilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2617 | View Replies]

To: Elpasser

Also keep in mind we have tons of cases by Alito on the record.

If there was any doubt as to his strict constructionist, conservative credentials, you should have no doubt alarm bells would be going off at FR and at NR etc.

This guy is a conservative. Some liberals like the guy.

People can like people they disagree with. I like several liberals even though I think they are flat wrong.


2,636 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:35 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2542 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

Have Nino testify! He's also from Trenton. So's my wife, in fact, but she's Irish.


2,637 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:52 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2618 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty

Cornyn is reading them the riot act about implying impropriety on the part of the judges for testifying.


2,638 posted on 01/12/2006 1:58:55 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2622 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

And it was a BEAUTIFUL thing! Thank you Sen. Cornyn!


2,639 posted on 01/12/2006 1:59:03 PM PST by ohioWfan (PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2634 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Judge Gibbons said it. He doesn't like Bush either which makes that statement even better.


2,640 posted on 01/12/2006 1:59:03 PM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2556 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,601-2,6202,621-2,6402,641-2,660 ... 3,401-3,406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson