Skip to comments.
Man [Raymond Hugh McNealy] Who 'Mooned' Neighbor Acquitted of Indecent Exposure
The Associated Press. ^
| January 04, 2006
| The Associated Press.
Posted on 01/04/2006 11:30:23 AM PST by Former Military Chick
ROCKVILLE, Md. (AP) - It's considered disgusting in most quarters, but a Montgomery County (website - news) appellate judge has ruled that "mooning" someone isn't illegal.
The defendant, 44-year-old Raymond McNealy of Germantown, was charged with indecent exposure after exposing part of his buttocks to his neighbor and her eight-year-old daughter following an argument.
A lower court found McNealy guilty. He faced up to three years in prison and a $10,000 fine, but he appealed. Circuit Court judge John Debelius ruled Tuesday that McNealy didn't commit a crime. He said if what McNealy did was indecent exposure, then "any woman wearing a thong at the beach at Ocean City would be guilty."
But Debelius clearly disapproved of McNealy's actions, saying it could have been different if he'd been on trial for "being a jerk."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; indecentexposure; mooning; publicnudity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Okdokie, equating thong wearing and mooning. Of course there was an 8 year old child involved as well.
Be intrigued what my fellow Freeper's will think of this ruling.
To: Former Military Chick
Okdokie, equating thong wearing and mooning
As far as exposure is concerned, there is no difference.
2
posted on
01/04/2006 11:33:12 AM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Iraqis thank our troops more often than Democrats.)
To: Former Military Chick
Some things can be bad without being a crime.
To: HEY4QDEMS
As far as exposure is concerned, there is no difference. Well, there's the little matter of testicles.
4
posted on
01/04/2006 11:34:47 AM PST
by
prion
(Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
To: Former Military Chick
I think this case threatens to reveal the cracks in our legal system.
5
posted on
01/04/2006 11:35:45 AM PST
by
keat
To: Former Military Chick
--when and where I was a kid, the act of "mooning" would have got you packed off to the state hospital (Mendota) for observation for a couple of weeks to see if you were fit to remain loose in society--
6
posted on
01/04/2006 11:36:19 AM PST
by
rellimpank
(Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
To: Former Military Chick
The only time I was every mooned was by two kids standing in the field of an elementary school mooning traffic....they were probably about 11 years old...
I laughed so hard I almost crashed...but still...those kids needed a major spanking for their obnoxious uncivil behaviour.
Where are the she-bears when you need them? :)
7
posted on
01/04/2006 11:37:48 AM PST
by
fizziwig
To: prion
there's the little matter of testicles
I see you've been talking to my wife.
8
posted on
01/04/2006 11:39:12 AM PST
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Iraqis thank our troops more often than Democrats.)
To: Former Military Chick
a Montgomery County appellate judge has ruled that "mooning" someone isn't illegal. Plumbers rejoice!
9
posted on
01/04/2006 11:39:34 AM PST
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: prion
LOL... That's a pretty serious moon if testicles are involved.
To: Former Military Chick
Is there a difference between seeing someone wearing a thong on the beach in OC vs. seeing some guy mooning you?...other than the hairy butt, that is.
To: Former Military Chick
Did this guy expose himself to an 8-yr old? He might not be guilty of a "crime", but he needs to be publicly told he's a jerk, as the judge said. Hope he had some big legal bills, anyway.
To: andrew2527
I agree... The article states that is was only a partial moon. My guess would be half or a 3/4ths moon. Not a full moon that would expose other things as well.
Remeber the sceen in Bravehart where the whole Irish army moons the English. LMAO... those were full moons plus some...
Spookadelic
To: Freedom_no_exceptions
Plumbers rejoice!
=P
14
posted on
01/04/2006 12:02:11 PM PST
by
Termite_Commander
(Warning: Cynical Right-winger Ahead)
To: ozzymandus
Inevitable civil suit by defendant to follow.
15
posted on
01/04/2006 12:06:43 PM PST
by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: Former Military Chick
When Plumbers' Butt is outlawed, then only...
16
posted on
01/04/2006 12:09:54 PM PST
by
Deguello
(Going through the Big D and I don't mean Dallas.)
To: Former Military Chick
What was the argument about? I would have gave him a bath with the garden hose. Why does every thing have to be solved in court now.
17
posted on
01/04/2006 12:09:57 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
(Praying)
To: Jack Wilson
Yeah, it was just intended as a wise crack...so to speak.
18
posted on
01/04/2006 12:10:47 PM PST
by
San Jacinto
(Hearing something on the network news is reason enough to disbelieve it.)
To: Former Military Chick
Too bad the woman didn't have a camera and snap a photo. She could have sent it around the internet as a joke, maybe to his Mom and other family members.
I'm tired of people assuming that if something isn't atually illegal that's the same as saying it's ok.
susie
19
posted on
01/04/2006 12:11:25 PM PST
by
brytlea
(I'm not a conspiracy theorist....really.)
To: spookadelic
The article states that is was only a partial moon. Waning or waxing?
20
posted on
01/04/2006 12:12:39 PM PST
by
San Jacinto
(Hearing something on the network news is reason enough to disbelieve it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson