Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department going after leakers! - Fox News
Fox News

Posted on 12/30/2005 7:26:42 AM PST by Pukin Dog

Just announced on Fox News, the Justice Department is going to investigate leaks pertaining to Goverment Wiretapping and Security programs.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: abouttime; absoultetreason; adiosmofo; bagthemthenhangthem; binladensbuds; cia; circularfiringsquad; deathpenalty; doj; dojprobe; doubleaughtspy; firingsquad; frogmarchwilson; heirsoftokyorose; heneededhangin; homelandsecurity; jamesrisen; leaks; letumfry; liberalstupidity; liberaltreason; nailemandjailem; nationalsecurity; newyorktimes; nsa; nyaljazeeratimes; patriotleak; prisonforrisen; reporterropetree; rockerfeller; sabateurs; scumstock2006; spying; thespywhoshaggedme; timesgoneinfiveyears; timetopaysulzberger; traitorjayrockefeler; traitormedia; traitorousbazturds; traitors; traitorsalad; traitortommydaschle; traitortots; tryagainsoros; turbindurbin; wheresthenoose; wolfpischer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,221-1,225 next last
To: angkor
Attention all: individuals without clearance (e.g., journos) are not subject to prosecution regarding classified materials.

Can they be charged with knowing receipt of classified materials?

241 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:07 AM PST by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I hope they get that 5-year-old that outed his parents' super-secret vacation at his father's airport news conference.

Don't worry. As of this moment,
He's on double-secret probation!

242 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:13 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: used2BDem

Re: Intelligence committee -- McCain's not, but there's an interesting line-up of possible leakers, starting with the Vice-Chair, JR IV of WV (my opinion, of course -- and it looks like quite a few others are thinking along those same lines):

http://intelligence.senate.gov/members.htm


243 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:14 AM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Joe Miner

Less filling... or tastes great?


244 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:32 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Yasotay
I didn't know that we were at War .

HUH? Where in heck have you been? DU has the exact same talking point.

245 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:42 AM PST by Chuck54 (Free Scooter, Indict Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Owen

If the reporter refuses to give up his sources, he or she will be jailed. And James Risen will be sent to a harsher prison than Judith Miller. As long as James Risen is getting buggered in prison, at least there will be some justice.


246 posted on 12/30/2005 8:11:54 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

Comment #247 Removed by Moderator

To: don-o
Gee whiz, Mr. Grumpy Gills. We are having a little optimism here.

Oh, don't get me wrong...I'd like nothing better than to see anyone with a (D-) after his/her name "frogmarched" all the way to Leavenworth, but it's not going to happen.

The best we can hope for is to reduce the fire hose to a trickle for a few weeks.
248 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:07 AM PST by Small-L (I love my country, but I'm disgusted with my government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac

"Thank you sirs, may I have another?" [Sheltonac's response to his Islamofascist masters.]

Do you think Patrick Henry would have had any problem with the interception of British mail or dispaches during the Revolutionary War? Do you really believe, were he alive today, that he would object to Bush using his authority to protect this nation from foreign attack? If you do, you're living in kookooland.


249 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:14 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: digger48; Alas Babylon!
Anyone want to predict who the Sunday show guests will be?

I'll say McCain, Biden and Harry.

:)

250 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:32 AM PST by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing. Become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
My suggestion of using lie detectors in public was not about the veracity of what would be gained rather the public perception that leaking classified secrets designed to protect we the people are taken seriously.

You may well be correct on your other points. Personally I think the leak had more to do with damaging Condi without ever having to say her name at present for future political advantage. These liberals have not given a rat's behind about homeland security, they are obsessed with the next election.
251 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:34 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Good news!!!!!


252 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:47 AM PST by mrs tiggywinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs; angkor

Angkor disagreed with you upthread. Is either of you an attorney with experience in this practice area?


253 posted on 12/30/2005 8:12:50 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: don-o

Rockefeller would be wise to avoid that circuit for the time being.


254 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:01 AM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Wonderful news! I hope that we see some of the MSM idiots put away for this!


255 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:10 AM PST by Halls (Never forget Terri Schiavo!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
dont be surprised when the leaking sources turn out to be certain RINOs on the Hill.

I frankly don't care. I just want them stopped...and prosecuted.

256 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:11 AM PST by Bahbah (A known Snow Flake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
Horrible logic

Not when the FBI gets to decide who is a terrorist. Also since the FBI is making those statements why isn't the domestic WOT won?

257 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:37 AM PST by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum
Can they be charged with knowing receipt of classified materials?

How about soliciting classified materials.

258 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:39 AM PST by Lil'freeper (HAPPY NEW YEAR!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac

"...against those nations, organizations, or persons..."

the above seems to cover anybody, as there is no specific or even general) exclusion(s)


259 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:39 AM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Someone on fox just hinted that the NYT may be in as much trouble as the leaker.


260 posted on 12/30/2005 8:13:49 AM PST by mware (everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,221-1,225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson