Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Myth of the Lost Ark fuels pride of a nation on brink of war (Lost Ark in Axum?)
News Telegraph, UK ^ | 12-29-05 | David Blair

Posted on 12/29/2005 6:54:10 AM PST by emiller

If Indiana Jones had done his homework, he would have found the Ark of the Covenant by raiding a church in the barren mountains of northern Ethiopia.

Many Ethiopians believe that the Ark, containing the stone tablets inscribed with God's Ten Commandments, rests in the church of St Mary of Zion, at the town of Axum, and some western scholars have

(Excerpt) Read more at news.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: ark; arkofthecovenant; ccc; ethiopia; godsgravesglyphs; tencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last
To: bonfire
In Italy in the city of Otranto there is a church whose walls and altar are made of of hundreds of bones and skulls. Otranto was way down south in the "heel" of the Italian "boot" and was constantly raided by the Ottoman Turks after they took Greece and the Balkans (it's only about 30 miles to Albania from Otranto).

Finally, in the 1400's, the Turks took the city. They gathered up all the people and forced them to convert to Islam. About 800 men refused to renounce Christ and were beheaded in the city square. This enraged the surrounding cities who raised up an army and threw the Turks out. A church was built in the city square and the bones of these brave 800 were made part of the church itself.

61 posted on 12/29/2005 9:51:29 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Obelisk, new finds unleash debate in Ethiopia
By Emily Wax
The Washington Post
Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002707622_obelisk28.html?syndication=rss


62 posted on 12/29/2005 9:52:32 AM PST by SunkenCiv ("In silence, and at night, the Conscience feels that life should soar to nobler ends than Power.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal
I don't buy it. If it's really there, then you don't hide it from view. I can't believe something exists if only one person may see it and all others are kept away by scary stories of what will happen to them.

Go to the Old Testament, my friend, and read how often the ark was seen once it was in the sanctum sanctorum. Once a year, and then only by the high priest.

63 posted on 12/29/2005 9:54:57 AM PST by curmudgeonII (If you're a classicist read Gibbon's description of Emperor Phillip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: job
There are people that believe that the Ark has been located, but its existence has not been revealed because it would lead to an immediate war between Israel and nearly all Arab nations.

I'd say there's not much time like the present for Israel.

64 posted on 12/29/2005 10:00:29 AM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: evets

ROTFLMAO!!


65 posted on 12/29/2005 10:00:55 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

How would that:

a) Not still be a war
-and-
b) Remove the Ark from being a reason for the war?


it would seem to me more likely to be a slaughter rather than a war. there wouldn't really be any fighting. and it sounded more like the war would be over the land the ark rests in, not over the ark itself.
altho, many countries and groups would probably happily goto war to get it for themselves. though i would bet any army except one led by israeli rabbis/ priests would meet the same fate the deacon threatens.


66 posted on 12/29/2005 10:02:29 AM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

"We didn't make the trip (pilgrimage) all the way to that ancient church in France just to see Mary Madelene's toe. We just saw an interesting village (I forget the name) on top of a pointed hill that looked fascinating (when we travel we just wander around without a set schedule) so we stopped to investigate. Upon entering the church we saw a sign that said the toe was in the catacombs under the church. Under those circumstances we could not resist, and I'll bet neither could you. LOL"

If every place that claimed to have a piece of her actually did, she'd have had to have had 278 toes and 385 fingers. ;)


67 posted on 12/29/2005 10:02:31 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

"I don't want to see the Temple back though I know prophetically it will happen. The Bible doesn't say that such a temple is a "good" thing but rather a place in which the "evil one" in human form throws down the gauntlet and commitx unspeakable blasphemies againt the anointed one of heaven! A temple in which animal sacrifices are once again in motion denies the "final" sacrifice of Jesus for all of our sins; these would serve to declare the his death on the cross was non-effectual for the remission of our transgressions."

Oh sheesh.

Keep in mind that the Jewish view is that the Temple might have been destroyed because of Jews following the blasphemy of Christianity. After all, Judaism was never big on the idea of human sacrifice.


68 posted on 12/29/2005 10:06:23 AM PST by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: job

I vaguely recall a plausible claim for the location of the Ark being buried somewhere under or very near a receding shore of the Dead Sea.


69 posted on 12/29/2005 10:13:18 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I have read (don't remember where) that the Ark is buried in or very near the Dead Sea...


70 posted on 12/29/2005 10:19:49 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I'd pass on the toe of Mary. ... I'm not Catholic but some Catholics say that she was swept up into heaven

He's talking about the toe of Mary Magdalene, not Mary the mother of Christ.

71 posted on 12/29/2005 10:28:10 AM PST by Campion ("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I don't think it was ever referenced in the Scriptures -- except in the past tense -- after "Shishak".

Actually, it is, once obliquely, and once directly. It's almost certain that the Ark was in Israel as late as the reign of Hezekiah. In 2 Ki. 19:15 and Isa. 37:16, we see the king praying, "O LORD God of Israel, who dwells between the cherubim . . ." Such a title is always used of God in reference to the Ark of the Covenant, per Exo. 25:22, 1 Sa. 4:4, 2 Sa. 6:2, 1 Ki. 8:6-7, and 1 Ch. 13:6.

Further, in 2 Ch. 35:3, we see Josiah saying to the Levites, "Put the holy Ark in the house which Solomon the son of David, king of Israel, built. It shall not be a burden on your shoulders. And serve the LORD your God and His people." Therefore, Shishak could not have captured or destroyed it, since its location was known to the Levites centuries later, though they had evidentially removed it from the Temple at some point before Josiah's reign. Since Josiah knew that they had it, it seems unlikely that it had been missing for centuries, but had been removed relatively recently.

Therefore, the most likely explanation for the Ark's absence is that it was removed during the reign of Manesseh, Josiah's predecessor, and it was probably at this time that it was taken to Elephantine Island, where as you said it remained for several centuries in what was apparently a scale copy of the Temple in Jerusalem (we even have papyri asking the priests in Jerusalem how to properly conduct sacrifices--which only makes sense if those on Elephantine had the Ark with them). When Josiah took the throne and led Israel in repentence, he asked the Levites to bring it back. The Bible doesn't say that they did so.

Shortly after that, we see Pharaoh Neco coming up to go to war with the Assyrians at God's order (2 Ch. 35:20)! But Josiah continued to go after Neco in disguise until he was slain in combat. Why would he do this against someone who was siding with him against Assyria at the command of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? While the Bible does not come out and say so, to me it seems likely that he was attempting to capture Neco to ransom him for the return of the Ark.

As for why the Bible doesn't just come out and say that the Ethiopians have the Ark, I suspect that was to safeguard the Ark.

72 posted on 12/29/2005 10:42:38 AM PST by Buggman (L'chaim b'Yeshua HaMashiach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Bump.


73 posted on 12/29/2005 10:59:46 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: emiller

Wow, that would be so neat.


74 posted on 12/29/2005 11:07:38 AM PST by Dustbunny (Socialist/Liberal/Progressive/Communist/Marxist are todays Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

Wow!
What a Treasure trove of Info!
Thanks!


75 posted on 12/29/2005 11:32:11 AM PST by NobleEagle2004 ("You Are The 1st Brigade!"StoneWall Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GuineaRabbit; Blood of Tyrants

Since the Ark of the Covenant was before the incarnation of Christ, it would be about the holiest relic to both Jews and Christians...seeing as how it hosted the presence of the same holy God....

Of course for Christians the communion chalice or a piece of the cross would rival it...however the Ark of the Covenant is NOT strictly a Jewish relic.


76 posted on 12/29/2005 11:32:49 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
t might be the Hebrews' holiest relic, but if it even exists, Christianity can hardly lay first claim to it. That would be like the Jews asserting that the Holy Grail is their holiest relic.

Actually, not, assuming objective truth.

If Jesus is the true Messiah, of both Jews and Gentiles, as Christianity from the New Testament on has always claimed, then those who trust in Jesus alone would be God's "chosen people" today... and Christianity would be the rightful heir to Old Testament Judaism... As weird as it sounds, modern Judaism, from this New Testament perspective, would be the 'heretical sect' of the ancient Judaism of the Temple and the Ark of the Covenant, since it has rejected the Messiah.

Yes there can be a place for the Jewish people in the future, but only through the Messiah, Jesus. This is standard traditional cross-denominational Christian theology.

Christians have always acknowleged the legitimacy of the religion of Old Testament Judaism, modern Judiasm though, because of its rejection of Jesus as Messiah, essentially recognizes no religious value at all to Christianity or its relics.

It would be well to remember modern Christianity, like ancient Judaism did, relies on BLOOD SACRIFICE for salvation, whearas modern Judaism (since they have no temple) does not ...hence Christianity in that one essential has more in common with ancient Judaism than modern Judiasm.

77 posted on 12/29/2005 11:53:42 AM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Supposedly it resides in a separate chapel in the Church of St. Mary. It is guarded by a priest who is chosen by his predecessor when a boy. He never leaves the premises but tends to the safety of the Ark.

Curiously, the Ethopian Christians have as part of their worship ritual copies of the Ark which they parade about during their services.

On the History Channel a few years ago they did an interesting piece on the Ark and how it wound up in Axum. Rather compelling too.

78 posted on 12/29/2005 12:29:26 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
"I would like to see the Ark, if it exists"

If you read the Old Testament, you might change your mind. The Ark is God's radio,a thing of great power, used by him to speak to the Israelites. Those not pure cannot approach it or they will be destroyed as were the Phillistines(?) who stole the Ark and paid so dearly they placed it on a cart drawn by white oxen to find its way back to the Israelites.

79 posted on 12/29/2005 12:32:37 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

A lot of assumptions there. Just for sake of argument, let's say the Ark is unconvered in Antarctica, and looking at it doesn't kill you.

Where should it be displayed of the following three choices:

a) The Vatican

b) National Museum of Israel (or whatever it's called)

c) The Smithsonian Museum


80 posted on 12/29/2005 12:40:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson