Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: rightwingintelligentsia
There's a reason they're rolling this movie out so slowly...
2 posted on
12/29/2005 6:14:46 AM PST by
loreldan
(Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I guess when the total box office take is crummy, you talk about sales per screen. There is a reason the movie is on so few screens...a very limited audience. Who really wants to see two gay sheepherders. If there is a sequel, I suggest the sheep go into hiding.
3 posted on
12/29/2005 6:14:59 AM PST by
frankjr
To: rightwingintelligentsia
ROTF. Now we know where Baghdad Bob landed....
4 posted on
12/29/2005 6:15:31 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hollyweirds contribution to society= normalizing homosexuality, promiscuity and a general lowering of morals.
5 posted on
12/29/2005 6:15:44 AM PST by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I looked in my rearview mirror.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
The hack flacking for this film is unreal! Every other box office tally lists the amount of million$ the film grossed over the period. In order to inflate this one, they have to use the "per-screen average." Pure propaganda.
6 posted on
12/29/2005 6:16:26 AM PST by
JennysCool
(Non-Y2K-Compliant)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I guess we all need to keep our fingers crossed for this movie's success, right? Isn't it great that all of those Golden Globe nominations for this movie were announced just in time to help make it successful? barf
7 posted on
12/29/2005 6:17:06 AM PST by
Clara Lou
(A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
All this means is that most of the gays are seeing it. I think everybody knew they would go flock to see the movie, it has a built-in niche audience.
8 posted on
12/29/2005 6:17:11 AM PST by
dfwgator
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hmm...because of it's relatively limited release, wouldn't it be more accurate to compare the "per theater" earnings of Kong and Narnia in the same cities where Brokeback was showing? Just a thought.
9 posted on
12/29/2005 6:17:32 AM PST by
Castigar
To: rightwingintelligentsia
The lies of the left know no bounds.
11 posted on
12/29/2005 6:18:26 AM PST by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
hmmm... I have NEVER (NEVER NEVER NEVER) heard of this 'per screen' average being used to rate a movie success.
I wonder why
Mel Gibson made a half billion for 'The Passion of the Christ'- what is the total take for this piece of excrement ?
They are trying to compare apples to oranges.
13 posted on
12/29/2005 6:20:14 AM PST by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help...)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Their marketing strategy is to roll it out to the top homo markets across the U.S. They're almost out of markets. The producers spent $14 million to the movie and the box office take has been $8 million, which means the producers have made approximately $4 million of that. They're still $10 million in the hole (pun not intended!) This movie is a flop, regardless of what the gay media cheerleaders try to say.
14 posted on
12/29/2005 6:20:32 AM PST by
jimbo123
To: rightwingintelligentsia
This is the homosexual "Titanic," a movie that will be seen 10-20 times by males homos as a date movie and by f*g hags. Since there are far less homos than teen girls, the take at the box office will be miniscule for the pudding eating movie in comparison to ship-sinking special effects.
16 posted on
12/29/2005 6:22:45 AM PST by
peyton randolph
(<a href="http://clinton.senate.gov/">shrew</a>)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
To: rightwingintelligentsia
"Two Queers on a Saddle"
I don't think so...
21 posted on
12/29/2005 6:25:01 AM PST by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Oh, we're doing per screen averages now?
Don't like the outcome? Change the rules!
23 posted on
12/29/2005 6:26:20 AM PST by
TankerKC
(Who will hold the NYT accountable for knowingly releasing classified info?)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
:)
Or, gives new meaning to:
"Bobby Gets His Gun"
Or somebody's.....
25 posted on
12/29/2005 6:26:43 AM PST by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Domestic Total as of Dec. 26, 2005: $7,573,000 (Estimate)
Running Time: 2 hrs. 14 min.
Production Budget: $14 million
that doesnt include marketing and * gifts *
30 posted on
12/29/2005 6:28:35 AM PST by
kajingawd
(" happy with stone underhead, let Heaven and Earth go about their changes")
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Brokebutt, I can't wait to not see it.
31 posted on
12/29/2005 6:28:44 AM PST by
Protagoras
(If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Who's ==>afraid<== of a couple of gay cowboys? What is it with people who think that when normal people are repulsed by the gay life style that they are afraid of it?
32 posted on
12/29/2005 6:28:58 AM PST by
Alouette
(Happy Hanukkah FReepers!)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
I guess Meet the Flockers isn't going over too well in the hinterlands.......
41 posted on
12/29/2005 6:31:31 AM PST by
Red Badger
(And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson