Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) FreeRepublic Folding@Home Project Update (We're in the Top 1,200!)
Free Republic Folders Stats Page ^ | 12/25/2005 | me

Posted on 12/25/2005 7:13:22 PM PST by texas booster

OK, new thread for the next week.

First, a big shout out to the SETI members who have added CPUs to the effort. Remember, its Team 36120, NOT Team 0.

Next, congrats to all for bumping our team up to 104 processors and 76 users. We have a number of new users in the team, with Clara Lou, fzx12345, SamfromLivingston, brityank, manwiththehands and Tami all popping onto the hit list this week.

Malsua, uriah and Ken in Texas are solidly in the top 10. Malsua is continuing to add systems and now accounts for 10% of the FR total. Great job!

Free Republic Folding@Home Stats Page

On the global front, Free Republic Folders is now listed at # 1196. We are poised to overtake (today):

carletonu (maybe in MN?)
Helms-Deep
2*ian
Dynadues
Soluchis
Greece and soon the
University of Pennsylvania!

We were passed by one team, SISD. My guess is that this team really is the computers of an Independent School District that were all "volunteered" to fold over the holidays. They are producing points at a rate of 37,000 points per day. As we gain members from the 100,000 FReepers that visit JimRob's place I expect that we will have a much greater long term growth than them.


TOPICS: Technical; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: computing; cure; disease; distributed; fah; fh; folding; foldingathome; foldinghome; prions; proteins; seti; software; stanford; stanforduniversity; tech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-378 next last
To: texas booster

put me on the ping list.

I'm going to add a few systems on monday, to see what kind of "bump" I can add to the stats..


21 posted on 12/25/2005 7:52:00 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

LOL. I was thinking the same thing. I was wondering if I had dropped in on a thread written in a foreign language.


22 posted on 12/25/2005 7:54:33 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker; umbagi

You are both on the ping list.

Thanks for helping!


23 posted on 12/25/2005 7:56:15 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: texas booster
ping me too.

Btw, I've still not in the team YET!!!

Still in the top 10 in team 36837 though....

24 posted on 12/25/2005 7:57:37 PM PST by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam; WVNan

Hey it's only geekspeak! Of course my head spins when I read about the results posted on the Stanford U Folding @ Home pages, such as here:

http://folding.stanford.edu/results.html

Basically we have all teamed together to run a "screensaver" that spends idle time on our computers folding protiens. On one hands we get to help out the world by advancing medecine. On the other hand we compete to see who is #1 in folding protiens.

Kinda neat thing to do when the average system runs at idle over half of the time.


25 posted on 12/25/2005 8:03:48 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Seamoth

Let the computers run overnight. If the results still seem wacky then reboot. The internal clock will then adjust the estimated completion date.

F@H work units are set to all complete within a week. Too hard to maintain valid science when the results are too spread out.


26 posted on 12/25/2005 8:06:46 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

Top 10 on a big team like that ... We would love to have you but I certainly understand. Still ...

Brother, could ya' spare an Opteron or two?


27 posted on 12/25/2005 8:11:18 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Thanks all for your help. My CPUs showing more reasonable ECDs of 1.8 days & 13 hours.


28 posted on 12/25/2005 8:12:07 PM PST by Seamoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Just stare at the screen for a while and it will all make sense or you could read some of the links....but what fun is that?
Welcome all!!
We're doing good works here.


29 posted on 12/25/2005 8:13:10 PM PST by Uriah_lost (http://www.wingercomics.com/d/20051205.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Klutz Dohanger

Thanks! It will be good to add to the systems that are turned off all week at work.

When next week rolls around I hope that everyone's new Christmas presents start cranking out the workunits!


30 posted on 12/25/2005 8:13:52 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: texas booster
Dern, I felt sure this was true.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1542570/posts

Live and learn.

31 posted on 12/25/2005 8:29:17 PM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

keep me on. I am up to 19 units complete now, should have another over night. The next set of units my computers have downloaded appear to take 2 days. Should see updates some time Tuesday.


32 posted on 12/25/2005 8:32:05 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KarinG1

The SETI project as currently constructed is being absorbed into a new distributed client called BOINC. BOINC clients will be able to run more than one distrubuted project at a time, and most expect that SETI users will migrate over to BOINC eventually.

We are hoping to pick up a few new F@H users from among the ranks of former (and current) SETI seekers.

SETI, much like the Genome@Home project that I started on years ago, is freezing the lists of contributors and basically starting the point totals over on BOINC.

Folding@Home may once day run under BOINC but the network is not stable enough for them to bless it.

Or maybe the various professors don't want to support another university's research. It's all about grant money.


33 posted on 12/25/2005 8:37:57 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit

You are on the ping list.

Thanks!


34 posted on 12/25/2005 8:41:32 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Why are we shown as '1210' rank on the folding@home stats page?

(Jinx on folding@home)


35 posted on 12/25/2005 8:41:42 PM PST by Glenn (What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

"Basically we have all teamed together to run a "screensaver" that spends idle time on our computers folding protiens. On one hands we get to help out the world by advancing medecine. On the other hand we compete to see who is #1 in folding protiens."

Questions:

  1. How is security handled so as to prevent hackers and invasion of privacy, ID theft, etc.?
  2. What safeguards are in place to prevent the data generated from falling into the wrong hands, say terrorists?
  3. How will the generated data ultimately be used?
  4. Can military (either ours or theirs) applications be developed from this?
  5. Can participation be controlled and/or terminated by end-user at any time?

Just wondering.

RT

36 posted on 12/25/2005 8:41:54 PM PST by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I pull my stats from the ExtremeOverclockers F@H stats page. The stats are pulled directly from Stanford's databases.

I feel that I have more flexibility when searching for interesting items in postings when using their pages. They also update quicker than the text files that Stanford uses.

See:

http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_summary.php?s=&t=36120


37 posted on 12/25/2005 8:48:04 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RebelTex
All answers pulled from Stanford's FAQ about Folding@Home, or my personal experience running the program.

Questions:

How is security handled so as to prevent hackers and invasion of privacy, ID theft, etc.?

{Stanford} We have worked very hard to maintain the best security possible with modern computer science methodology. Our software will upload and download data only from our data server here at Stanford. The Cores are also digitally signed (see below) to make sure that you're getting the true Stanford cores and nothing else.

How is this possible? We take extensive measures to check all of the data entering your computer and the results we send back to Stanford with 2048 bit digital signatures. If the signatures don't match (on either the input or the output) the client will throw away the data and start again. This ensures, using the best software security measures developed to date (digital signatures and PKI in version 3.0), that we are keeping the tightest possible security. Finally, the client/screen saver are available for download only from this web site, so that we can guarantee the integrity of the software. We do not support Folding@home software obtained elsewhere and prohibit others to distribute the software.

What safeguards are in place to prevent the data generated from falling into the wrong hands, say terrorists?

See above. Data is only pushed to the Stanford servers. It is not polled from them to each team or user.

How will the generated data ultimately be used?

{Stanford} Who "owns" the results? What will happen to them? Unlike other distributed computing projects, Folding@home is run by an academic institution (specifically the Pande Group, at Stanford University's Chemistry Department), which is a nonprofit institution dedicated to science research and education. We will not sell the data or make any money off of it.

Moreover, we will make the data available for others to use. In particular, the results from Folding@home will be made available on several levels. Most importantly, analysis of the simulations will be submitted to scientific journals for publication, and these journal articles will be posted on the web page after publication. Next, after publication of these scientific articles which analyze the data, the raw data of the folding runs will be available for everyone, including other researchers, here on this web site.

Can military (either ours or theirs) applications be developed from this?

I am sure that the military has already pinpointed applications that could make use of thousands of slower processors. However they have the money to buy thousands of faster processors, and a need to keep that research off the general Internet. We are pretty safe from our guys.

In a similar vein, there was an article years ago about Saddam buying/stealing thousands of Playstations to use their graphics processors to launch missles, etc. I do not know if that has ever been substantiated and it is much easier said than done.

Can participation be controlled and/or terminated by end-user at any time?

The application is completely under your control. Turn the machine off and it stops. Right-click the tray icon and hit Exit and it stops. Take it out of the Startup folder and it will never run again.

This is a very benign application, and only runs when nothing else is running. Your system will ask for a work unit, fold it and then contact the Stanford server to send it the results. If nothing is heard from a system in about a week, then the work unit is given to someone else to complete.

Just wondering.

No prob! This is a very similar project to the SETI@Home project which search radio signals for life from outer space.

38 posted on 12/25/2005 9:09:12 PM PST by texas booster (Bless the legal immigrants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Thank you for the info. It sounds like a pretty cool project.

If I joined, do you think the program could have a small subroutine to find me a date with my dream woman? Nah, nevermind, that would take over all the processing time and kill the program, LOL.

;^D


39 posted on 12/25/2005 9:24:18 PM PST by RebelTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

Added Laptop, and 10 W2K servers... will add some more tonight, If my VPN comes back up, and then I'll seriously start trying to pad the stats on Monday...

This is more fun than freepin' a CNN poll.... :)


40 posted on 12/25/2005 9:26:51 PM PST by Klutz Dohanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson