Posted on 12/17/2005 6:40:17 AM PST by Kaslin
I understand we've already got much of the Patriot Act legislation...this act goes after terrorist...why are we just hearing about this act...and not other legislation that's as intrusive?
You clearly don't. People are forfeiting their assets without being convicted of dealing drugs--and in fact, without any traces of drugs in their possession whatsoever. So what you mean to say is, "Don't deal drugs, forfeit your car anyway."
Agreed there.
And by the 1940s, there were a whole lot of laws on the books regarding the jews that they had no freedoms by that time, either.
This time around it's the Christians.
It's theoretically possible to conduct roving wiretaps in a manner consistent with the fourth amendment, but today they aren't. The fourth amendment requires that warrants "particularly describe the place to be searched." A roving wiretap provides a warrant that specifically permits searching "anywhere X might go." It's the fourth amendment equivalent of issuing a warrant that permits police to search any building the target enters, including neighbors' houses, business establishments, workplaces, etc.
The prevention of these are what Dingy Harry just bragged about killing. (the original story is still in the sidebar)
Hmm. When they start passing laws that Christians can't attend law school, that's when the "Patriot Act" has gone to far..
.
The Man Who Predicted 9/11:
Lifetime Lifesaving Hero RICK RESCORLA, R.I.P.
http://www.RickRescorla.com
http://www.strategyzoneonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24361
.
There's an important distinction to keep in mind. German antisemitism was racist, and demanded that Jews be removed from the gene pool. Moden anti-christian sentiment is not racist, and doesn't involve killing anyone. The goal is to prevent the transmission of christian beliefs, both to between people and between generations. Preventing spread between people makes christianity stop growing; preventing inter-generational transmission makes it begin to shrink.
To accomplish that goal, it suffices to place obstacles in the way of obeying or expressing one's faith, while providing tempting alternatives with fewer obstacles. That's why the first amendment suddenly bans religious expression, but protects pornography as sacrosanct.
As for christians becoming lawyers: they can. But before receiving high court appointments, they must solemnly swear that they will leave their faith behind when they put on their robes.
Nonsense. Anyone who uses these tools for any other purpose than lawful terrorism investigation should get three meals a day, and a 6' x 10' space nicely set off by concete and steel, from the taxpayers.
Only somebody who believes DUmmie conspiracy theories about what "really happened" on Flight 93 could buy these claims.
I'm worried about the 9/11-style near-miss-attacks NOT prevented by the Patriot Act.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.