Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Psychopolitics: Erasing Christianity through the Consensus Process
Sierra Times ^ | 12/16/2005 | Linda Kimball

Posted on 12/16/2005 5:43:52 AM PST by FerdieMurphy

"Not too many years ago, Americans had never heard of sensitivity training, and if a facilitator of it had tried to convince them that they needed to be conditioned by it, he would have been told, very quickly and in no uncertain terms, to take a hike.

However, step by careful step, sensitivity training began to be stealthily inserted into our society. Today, Americans simply submit to it without much thought, let alone any protest." ("Psychopolitics: Joe Six-Pack and the Crocodile" Linda Kimball)

Sensitivity training, hate-crime laws, political correctness, multiculturalism, and the group dynamics and/or 'facilitated consensus process'---all of these alien constructs are psycho political manifestations of evolutionary humanism, the malevolent system of warped morals and anti-human philosophy that is making war upon America's founding Christian-Judeo worldview.

The definition of psycho politics is as follows: "Psychopolitics is the art and science of asserting and maintaining physical and mental dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers, bureaus, and the masses, thereby conquering enemy nations through "mental healing." (Russian Manual on Psychopolitics, by Laventi Pavlovich Beria, head of the Soviet Secret Service Police and right hand man of Joseph Stalin)

In 1947, Julian Huxley, head of UNESCO at that time, wrote a book titled, "UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy." His book was a blueprint for a New World Order that called for one religion, one language, and one way of thinking. He believed a global order could be brought about through the universal, albeit secretive, implementation of Hegel's Dialectic process.

Huxley observed, "The task before UNESCO…is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose." Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews confronting each other from the West and the East. In describing them he said, "You may categorize the two philosophies as…individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russian…or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe…this can happen…through the inexorable dialectic of evolution."

The concept of dialectics has been around for a long time. Noah Webster (1828 edition) defined dialectics as: "That branch of logic which teaches the rules and modes of reasoning." Simply stated, dialectics refers to 'position' versus 'opposition' or 'thesis' versus 'antithesis.' By the traditional rules of conduct, if thesis is correct then it follows logically that antithesis is incorrect. Georg Hegel, an Enlightenment shock trooper of evil, discarded the rules and turned the concept upside-down by equalizing thesis and antithesis, which resulted in moral relativity. 'New truth' is now found in something called 'synthesis.'

Hegelian Dialect is a perfect example of what J. Budziszewski (What We Can't Not Know, pp. 187) termed the "black magic spells of imposture and unraveling." Hegel's form of dialectics is itself an impostor. It effectively unravels truth and norms and then replaces them with a 'new truth' which is yet another impostor.

Hegel's 'black magic' Dialectics is the unholy diesel that fires the engine of the weapon of mass destruction being wielded by traitorous Americans and their New Age internationalist cohorts against America's traditional worldview and cultural infrastructure. This weapon is called "group dynamics" or the "consensus process." It's a psycho political behavior and belief modification technique that was used by Vietnamese communists against American POWs and by Chinese communists against dissidents. All individuals have an inherent fear of being alienated from the group, and by psychologically manipulating this fear skillful change-agents (facilitators) can manipulate or herd the victim towards a preplanned conclusion which induces the victim to compromise his own position. This is the consensus process, and when we hear Liberals screaming for 'consensus," they're really demanding that they be allowed to 'facilitate' the abandonment of Conservative principles.

There are three steps to the consensus process. They are called, "Unfreezing the present level, moving to the new level and, freezing group life on the new level." In order to speed up the unfreezing phase, communists resorted to physical torture. In America, emotional pain precipitated through vicious psychological bullying (character assassination, labeling, spreading lies, etc) is the preferred method.

There are four key elements necessary for a successful 'consensus process' operation. They are:

(1) multicultural and/or diverse groups fueled by resentment and envy (necessary for causing social conflict)

(2) a social issue around which conflict can be created (example: Christmas, which is labeled 'exclusionary, insensitive, and hurtful' to diverse groups)

(3)the dialoguing to consensus process (psychological manipulation leading to abandonment of principles and positions)

(4)a predetermined outcome (example: Christmas parades successfully recast as 'Festival of Lights" or "Winter Holiday" parades that are inclusive of gay pride celebrants)

The consensus process is yet another example of Budziszewski's "black magic spells of imposture and unraveling." It's been so successful that Christianity has been banned from government on all levels, from schools, and increasingly from public areas. Christians have lost their jobs, been jailed, and their children harassed and even suspended for daring to express their Christian beliefs in any way. Anti-Christian bias has become so bad that John Gibson (Fox News anchor) observed, "It's no longer permissible to wish anyone Merry Christmas. That's too exclusive, too insensitive. What if they're not Christian? What if they're an atheist? A school in Maryland is now questioning Thanksgiving because, after all, to whom are we giving thanks if not to God, and we all know we can't have that in public…Yes, Virginia, there is a war on Christmas." (Introduction, "The War on Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought.)

And now a word from New World Order facilitators:

"We have battled in America since the century's turn to bring to nothing…all Christian influences and we are succeeding. You must work until officials of city, county, and state will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies. (there must) be a…foaming hatred of religion…a belief that Christian practice is vicious, bad, insanity causing, publicly hated and intolerable." (Russian Manual on Psychopolitics)

"I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology. Its importance has been…increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated." Bertrand Russell

John Gibson asked a Eugene, Oregon city manager why he had banned Christmas trees. His properly mind-conformed response, "Well, because they're Christian" (pp. 87). This manager and countless scores of other Americans testify to the enormous success thus far achieved by psycho political operatives. Having been "unfrozen" from the level whereon America's traditional worldview resides and successfully 'moved' to the desired level and then 'frozen' there, they now serve their new masters desires by mindlessly destroying the source of both their liberties and their human worth---Christianity.

"Oh but, Christianity has nothing to do with either the founding of our nation or with our rights and freedoms!" exclaim mind-conditioned scoffers and skeptics. The truth has been 'hiding' in full view, but because their minds have been darkened by black magic spells and their eyes made sightless by black magic dust, the mind-conditioned can neither see nor hear the truth. Right there in Huxley's words is the truth, for in speaking of his blueprint he inadvertently 'confessed' to it when he said of the two opposing philosophies, "You may categorize the two philosophies as…Christianity versus Marxism."

Cain "Dialogues to Consensus" with Abel

His blackened soul seething with diabolical envy, silver-tongued Cain manipulates Abel into trusting him. "Come, my dearly beloved brother. Let us take a nice long walk and speak of our need for equality, fairness, inclusion, and democracy. We will 'dialogue to consensus.' See this nice strong cudgel? I'll carry it so as to ensure that no harm befalls us. Trust me, Abel -- I'm your loving brother!"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aclu; commieconditioning; culturewars; nuclearoption; psychology; purge; secularization; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Knitting A Conundrum

I read something on FR recently that someone somewhere is proposing a person with radical beliefs or "bias" should be entered into the medical lexicon as a type of disorder that can be diagnosed as such. The first thing I thought of is how easy it could be to have such a person committed to mental institutions. A way to get rid of people who can think...


21 posted on 12/16/2005 6:32:37 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Actually, a facilitator is an important role in such settings as corporate strategy meetings and brainstorming with more than a half dozen participants.

It's so stupid to take perfectly good words and concepts and make them into nefarious things. Obviously, if somebody 'facilitates' you into compromising your belief in the Bodily Resurrection of Christ you and he did a bad thing -- but that doesn't make ALL "facilitation" into a bad thing.

The same with the concept "synthesis". Do you folks think Hegel INVENTED the reality of a thesis and its antithesis being forged into a new synthesis? I use this process every day, and I bet you do too. I manage a business; one group within the business thinks the only way to do something is A (because of value A) and the other group says no, B (because of value B) and it is my job to say "here is a method C which preserves both values A and B."

Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Facilitation. Consensus.

Real Satanic stuff.

22 posted on 12/16/2005 6:33:39 AM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Has been done and is done in some places in the world...


23 posted on 12/16/2005 6:42:20 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

"There are a million such plots. Most of them are open, not esoteric"

The serious ones trace back to the same origin. Many of those active today are using just the tactics described in the article.


24 posted on 12/16/2005 6:47:03 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

"Evil does not exist on its own"

Oh, yes it does, and it is malign and intelligent. More intelligent than we are.


25 posted on 12/16/2005 6:48:42 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

But as far as I know, it hasn't been done here, at least legitimately. This seems to me to be laying the groundwork...


26 posted on 12/16/2005 6:49:47 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: walden
Right. There are theses which admit of no movement toward antithesis ("Jesus Christ is God Incarnate"). And there are theses which do ("We should use maple on the cabinets.")

The word 'thesis' is used for all kinds of affirmative statements and positions. Hegelian 'logic" is perfectly useful in the appropriate setting and in fact is ubiquitous. It is not possible for good and evil to reach a consensus position. They have nothing in common. When 'good" moves toward 'evil" the proper term for that is "sin" or "treason", not "consensus".

Just because some goofy liberal decides he can trick dreamy-eyed Christians into sin by using the word "consensus" doesn't make the WORD bad, it just makes the Christian naive. By focusing on the word or the process, as if it holds some black power, you are playing the devil's game along with him.

The MORAL key is not in the diagram of the process (the typical reaction of the dilettante) but in the CONTENT OF THE THESIS AND ITS RESULTANT SYNTHESIS.

Also, 'consensus" and "compromise" are two different things.

I wish I had the time to critique all the semi-literate, semi-biblical pseudo-thought on this thread, but I have syntheses to forge.

27 posted on 12/16/2005 6:50:33 AM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: twigs

There are people who would like to...


28 posted on 12/16/2005 6:52:29 AM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
"Evil does not exist on its own, it is parasitic and reactive."

I disagree, Evil is the absence of Good; much like Darkness is the absence of Light, or Cold the absence of Heat
29 posted on 12/16/2005 6:55:37 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY (( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Having worked in higher education for 25 years, this is SOP for gaining conformity as the elite define it. Sadly, open expression of all ideas is no longer tolerated, nor encouraged. Welcome to the new millennium, you have the freedom to conform.


30 posted on 12/16/2005 6:56:24 AM PST by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy; Dr. Eckleburg; SkyPilot; goldstategop; Cincinatus' Wife; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; ...
The Nuclear Option

Slapping the donkey...

Red, black, green and gold - - the colors from the Rastafarian religion, the woolen hats in the four Ethiopian colors, the shrines in those colors found in their yards and pictures of Haile Selassie... (A move by the Left to marginalize Ethiopian Jews?)

What you will not hear from these perpetual pro-marijuana masturbaters is that this “ganga” thing is related to the anti-caucasian and racist Rasafarian religion in Jamaica.

Their ideology is that white men are devils. Marcus Garvey in the early 1900's said an African King would become the black messiah. Ras Tafari was crowned King Haile Selassie of Ethiopia and proclaimed to be their messiah in 1930.

According to the Rastafarian pagans, Ras Tafari did not die in 1975, but went to another dimension. He is called “Jah” and considered to be a god. A pagan perversion of Christian theology.

Of course all of this lunacy is centered around smoking the ganga weed.

That is partly why these feminized males will defend pot smoking, drug abuse and deviant use of their anatomy and are not safe to have around children...

A great post...

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Without touching on their use of MJ, the rastaferians ALSO pointed Haile being the last "Lion of Judah". It is noteworthy that there's a Biblical prophecy that when the last LOJ goes down, Ethiopia turns into a desert.

And, when Haile went down, the Northern core of the country was turned into a desert by its new Communist masters.

131 posted on 11/28/2005 6:04:36 PM PST by muawiyah (u)

Kwanzaa... just another cultural Marxism like the Rastafarian pothead religion...

Now, look a Tookie's Rastafarian hairstyle and tell me if he is not considered a prince of among the New Age Neo-pagan idolators just like Mumia Abu Jamal...

Another source of amazement is the concept of those who hold candlelight vigils (yet another example of religious ceremony) for heinous murderers about to be executed, a large number of whom think it is acceptable to murder an unborn child without the benefit of a trial. Is the “right to life” of one responsible for much murder and mayhem more important than that of a truly innocent unborn child?

Perhaps we should call capital punishment “post-natal abortion” and identify abortion as a “pre-natal death sentence” or “pre-natal summary execution.”

Another example is Michael Jackson. With the undying support of his “fans” (or fanatics) in the face of his more than questionable activities concerning the abuse of children, they still hold him up as an idol. Jackson, both in his family life as a child and his adult life, is a modern extension of pedagogical pagan pedophilia of previous ages in ancient civilizations. Look at the macabre pagan elements of Jackson's video, Thriller. Michael Jackson now resides in Bahrain... coincidence?

Michael Jackson had Nation of Islam thugs as bodyguards escorting him after court appearances through the throngs of frenzied supporters. Is Jackson their new pharaoh? Nation of Islam is a militant racist cult. Their leaders, Louis Farrakhan (the numerologist) and Kahlid Abdul Mohammed, are known Jew haters. They also support many illogical and socially subversive Leftist political activities intent on tearing down the structures of Modern Western Civilization and capitalism. Why did they shower Tookie Williams with so much adoration?

There is a clear connection between modern neo-paganism and ancient paganism related to Islamic conflict with the Judaic roots of Christendom. A focus on how this is manifested in a modern sense only requires a look at pop-culture icons in entertainment, sports “heroes,” and attempts by the Left to use a pseudo-Christian sense of pagan moralistic idolatry to demonize political opposition. I present to you the attack on U.S. Senator Rick Santorum for his comments on sodomy as a useful example. A Sacred Cow, a golden calf.

Is it coincidence that many domestic social issues are being driven by cultic Leftist advocacy of unnatural, phantasmagoric perversity?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

If you want to be added to this list, please notify me...

Originally, the Nuclear Option Ping List started out as a practical joke. With all the vitriolic response I received from certain un-named individuals, I figured it would be a great idea to do it for real...

I have observed here on Free Republic, a never ending flaming of religious folks and conservatives by people who promote things such as drug abuse, homosexuality, the ritual murder of abortion and other garbage.

Not being an orthodox or ecumenical atheist, it has really stretched my patience. I do not think policemen are jack-booted thugs, nor do I look at people who want to protect their families from filthy scum as brownshirts.

The purpose of this is to alert people to the cultural Marxism run amok... Drugs, sex perverts, pornography (in film and in music), marijuana, liquor, bashing the religious people, destroying social institutions (like marriage and the Boy Scouts), etc., etc.,... ad nausea...

The druggies like the sex perverts can only perpetuate an ever increasing market for their filth by molesting the minds and bodies of the young ones... this is the only way they get new Demo-rat voters... CHEMICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE!

It is no coincidence Islamic pagans hate Israel, Jews, Christians and Western Civilization. The entire basis of Western Civilization is Mosaic Law, something both the Neo-Pagan Left and the pagan Islamic thugs cannot abide and wish to destroy.

The very idea that human beings have individual rights not subject to the whims of a monarch, but subject to the laws of Yahweh, is directly from Moses.

Historically, this is proven over and over again with the succsessive conflicts between the forces of paganism and the Judaic culture. It is being played out here and all over the world today...

Observing this as an atheist, I prefer the paradigm of a Judaic culture to the chaotic death cult of New Age neo-pagan absurdity.

31 posted on 12/16/2005 6:57:44 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

" Do you folks think Hegel INVENTED the reality of a thesis and its antithesis being forged into a new synthesis?"

The first person I heard to use the terms was Karl Marx!


32 posted on 12/16/2005 6:59:04 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY (( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Right!!!! That is MY point. "Consensus" is a tactic! It is morally neutral! It derives its moral content from the specific instance. It can be good to seek a consensus, in some settings and about some issues, and it can be outright apostasy to even think about a consensus in other settings or over other issues.

"Flanking" is a tactic. It might be good, it might be bad.

But good grief, you don't want to adopt the position that all flanking was invented by, say, Hitler, in an effort to rule the world, even though it is true that every time Hitler used the tactic it was evil, because his aim was evil.

Why abandon the term and the concept because some idiot misused it?

33 posted on 12/16/2005 7:00:54 AM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

" Do you folks think Hegel INVENTED the reality of a thesis and its antithesis being forged into a new synthesis?"

The first person I heard to use the terms was Karl Marx!


34 posted on 12/16/2005 7:02:39 AM PST by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY (( Terrorism is a symptom, ISLAM IS THE DISEASE!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

"But good grief, you don't want to adopt the position that all flanking was invented by, say, Hitler"

I don't think anyone has suggested that.

"Why abandon the term and the concept because some idiot misused it?"

Or that. I thought the author was just trying to clarify the tactics.


35 posted on 12/16/2005 7:06:21 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

"The first person I heard to use the terms was Karl Marx!"

One interesting thing about "Dawn to Decadence" by Barzun is that it appears such utopian movements have been around for at least hundreds of years.


36 posted on 12/16/2005 7:07:46 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
Having worked in higher education for 25 years, this is SOP for gaining conformity as the elite define it.

Can you give me some examples of what you've seen? Are you in a state college or private college?

37 posted on 12/16/2005 7:11:07 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan

I don't want to hinge this thing on the word "consensus" or anything else. There's a spiritual war going on. This article is correct in many areas.

St. Paul wrote that our enemies our not entirely flesh and blood, but are principalities and powers of darkness in high places. These are strong Christian doctrines many here are discussing. We are talking about the ruling of the world by the "prince of this world" and his dark allies.

Multiculturalism is a Satanic enterprise. You can label me a nut or a kook, but that's my opinion. Anything so divisive and anti-Christian, masquerading as tolerance, had to be hatched in Hell. We must fight it at every opportunity. I hope you will join us, whether you be Christian or not.


38 posted on 12/16/2005 7:11:59 AM PST by Luke21 (Political correctness is the insane religion of our rulers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: twigs
I read something on FR recently that someone somewhere is proposing a person with radical beliefs or "bias" should be entered into the medical lexicon as a type of disorder that can be diagnosed as such. The first thing I thought of is how easy it could be to have such a person committed to mental institutions.

This was standard practice in the former Soviet Union, and a good reason why psychology should be severely scrutinized. Unfortunately, psychology, or psychological mumbo-jumbo, pervades our society.

As far as I know, the three main branches of psychology are Freudianism, Jungianism, and Behaviorism. It's apparent now that Freudianism was invented out of whole cloth. Jungianism is occultic. And Behaviorism, while it may contain trivial truths, is perniciously reductionistic. So what's left?

39 posted on 12/16/2005 7:16:19 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
You are not a nut or kook. You are exactly right and stated what is happening in clear and concise language.

I think even Christians, in our "enlightened" and "reasonable" age, forget the source of the real conflict. We need to be reminded. Thank you for doing that.

40 posted on 12/16/2005 7:18:49 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson