Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Closer on McCain Torture Ban
AP/Drudge ^ | 12.15.05 | Liz Sidoti

Posted on 12/15/2005 9:15:21 AM PST by meandog

WASHINGTON - After months of resistance, the White House has agreed to accept Sen. John McCain's call for a law specifically banning cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of foreign suspects in the war on terror, several congressional officials said Thursday. The congressional officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt an expected announcement later in the day at the White House, possibly by President Bush and McCain. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; torture; torturebill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Skip Ripley
I still say placing panties on the heads of prisoners should merit the perps twenty years. Oh the humanities!

< /sarcasm >

Treating terrorists by Marquis of Queensbury (sp?) rules is asinine.
21 posted on 12/15/2005 9:32:04 AM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino

Thank you very much....I haven't been able to follow things for a while..Christmas stuff.

I guess McCain has shown that he has WAY too much power..and this will just inspire him more to think that he can get elected WITHOUT the right wing of the Republican party..blech


22 posted on 12/15/2005 9:32:19 AM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: johnmecainrino
And the gutless wonders in Congress
23 posted on 12/15/2005 9:32:48 AM PST by saveliberty (Stop the McCainity. Vote Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It's not just assinine, it's suicidal. And as someone once said, the Constitution is not a suicide pact.
24 posted on 12/15/2005 9:33:16 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: meandog

You don't get it. All this means is that the GOP realizes it can't appeat to stand "for" torture, so all that will happen is that we will 100% "outsource" our interrogation to imaginative allies. This may actually result in more information.


25 posted on 12/15/2005 9:34:35 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Banning torture is leftist?


26 posted on 12/15/2005 9:35:11 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Do you seriously---now really, be serious---do you seriously think that Bush could VETO a defense appropriations bill (read: "body armor for the troops") right now? Not gonna happen.

We'll just outsource to some inventive allies like the Egyptians, who have, shall we say, unorthodox methods of interrogation. I'd bet this results in more information, not less.

27 posted on 12/15/2005 9:36:34 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Why don't you tell us EXACTLY what's to like about Senator John McCain?



Honest, character, accountability, straight talk.

28 posted on 12/15/2005 9:37:01 AM PST by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Honest, character, accountability, straight talk.

ROFLMAO.

I'll say this for you, even in that dream world you're living in, you've got nerve.

He's a lying crook who cheated on his first wife.

And a major league manipulator, media whore.

All anybody needs to know about this man is that the MSM loves him.

29 posted on 12/15/2005 9:38:35 AM PST by Howlin (Just say Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LS

Thanks for the information on this "vote."


30 posted on 12/15/2005 9:39:22 AM PST by Howlin (Just say Merry Christmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LS
Do you seriously---now really, be serious---do you seriously think that Bush could VETO a defense appropriations bill (read: "body armor for the troops") right now?

Over this, damn right I do.

31 posted on 12/15/2005 9:39:23 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: meandog
The Al Qaeda Bill of Rights
32 posted on 12/15/2005 9:39:59 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion it will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Honest, character, accountability, straight talk.

Wow, I get it now. You forgot the sarcasm tag. Very funny.

This bill will work about as good as the McLame campaign finance bill, which was and is a complete failure. It did the opposite of what he told us it would do.

And, McLame does not have the honesty to come out and tell us that it is not working. Yeah, he is the kind of guy we all need to look up to /sarcasm>

33 posted on 12/15/2005 9:42:08 AM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Calling all Arizona Freepers! What happened to that recall election petition for McCain that was dropped after 9/11? We need that desperately right now. And send a message to the DC subversives that they were elected to represent the people of this country, not the terrorists.


34 posted on 12/15/2005 9:42:31 AM PST by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Then you haven't a clue. No one in Washington (unless the ultra-anti-war left) can vote against a defense bill or veto one. That would destroy Bush and probably damage the GOP's chances in 2006, because they would be tarred with his "Bush-vetoed-body-armor." The clever trick by McLame was to get this attached to a DEFENSE bill. Any other bill, Bush could have vetoed it. Nope, not something any credible leader can do.


35 posted on 12/15/2005 9:42:31 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: meandog

"McCain Torture Ban"


I agree to this ban. I am tired of being tortured by hearing about McCain's abject stupidty.


36 posted on 12/15/2005 9:42:42 AM PST by HighWheeler (RATS hero is an impeached, dis-barred, lying, perjuring, cheating, lazy, cowardly sexual predator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
Then you haven't a clue. No one in Washington (unless the ultra-anti-war left) can vote against a defense bill or veto one.

With this provision, this isn't a defense bill, it's a freaking white flag.

37 posted on 12/15/2005 9:44:24 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I don't care what you call it. In a year, we'll still be processing prisoners and the troops will be armed. But to have vetoed this would have been beyond political suicide. The ONLY things Bush had going for him were the WOT and the economy, and that would have destroyed his WOT credentials. It would have in one measure given the Dems 100% recovery from their death spiral. To veto ANY defense appropriation bill is not debatable politically, for anyone.


38 posted on 12/15/2005 9:46:35 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: meandog

McCain is pathetic idiot. He is basically a Pat Buchanan with political power.

What we need is a law that requires cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of foreign suspects in war on terror.


39 posted on 12/15/2005 9:48:06 AM PST by Busywhiskers ("...moral principle, the sine qua non of an orderly society." --Judge Edith H. Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
To veto ANY defense appropriation bill is not debatable politically, for anyone.

I can only speak for myself. And I'd've vetoed it. On national TV. In prime time.

40 posted on 12/15/2005 9:48:24 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson