Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plummeting 2005 box office sparks Hollywood crisis
AFP ^ | 12/13/05 | Staff

Posted on 12/13/2005 11:34:35 AM PST by Millee

Even a much-hyped giant gorilla, a geisha and a schoolboy magician won't be able to create a happy ending at the US box office, as Hollywood ends its most disappointing year in nearly two decades. Plunging movie ticket sales, after a string of uninspiring remakes and movie sequels coupled with an explosion of the DVD and video game markets, are keeping audiences at home and have sent Hollywood into a deep existential crisis. "This industry is facing significant challenges said Jack Kyser, chief economist of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp, a business support and research body.

Ticket sale revenues dropped five percent in the first 11 months of 2005 while the number of Americans going to the cinema fell by 6.2 percent compared with the same period in 2004, according to box office trackers Exhibitor Relations Co Inc.

The result is Tinseltown's most disappointing box office performance in 15 years as audiences, dazzled by their entertainment choices and disappointed by the mediocre films on offer, turned away from the cinema in droves.

Even the late November and December releases of blockbusters "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "King Kong", "Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe" and "Memoirs of a Geisha" are unlikely to turn around the downward trend.

"It's not just a slump in box office, but also in sales of DVDs," Kyser told AFP. "This is mainly because of unattractive movies that don't appeal to young male audiences, the cost of movie tickets, parking, the shrinking window a movie's theatrical and DVD releases.

In addition, Hollywood faces a major external threat: runaway production costs, the growing trend of movie producers to shoot in places such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand to cash in on much lower staff and production charges.

"Some studios are doing some moderate lay offs. LA's future is at stake," Kyser said, demonstrating the depth of despair in the nine-billion-dollar a year industry.

Industry movers are battling to isolate the true causes of the slump, crossing their fingers that the big-budget money-spinners up Hollywood's sleeve will help ease the pain.

"Is it the movies? Is it the ticket prices? Is it because home theater and DVD?," pondered Exhibitor Relations Co's chief Paul Dergarabedian."I think is it because all this happening at the same time, it is a combination of facts."

But he was optimistic for the future of the industry, saying that when Hollywood does dish up a good film, audiences still go rushing to see it.

"'Harry Potter' is showing that people still want to go to the movies but still they need a good reason to go," Dergarabedian told AFP.

The fourth film of JK Rowling's cult novels opened on November 18 and has so far raked in 244 million dollars, making it second most successful film of 2005, behind "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith".

"When a good movie strikes, people go to the theatres," said Dergarabedian.

The last in the "Star Wars" series raked in a whopping 380 million dollars in North American box office, "War of the Worlds," starring Tom Cruise took 234 million, the comedy "Wedding Crashers" notched up 208 million in ticket receipts and Tim Burton's "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" took 206 million.

But the successes were few and far between in 2005.

Ron Howard's 88-million-dollar biopic "Cinderella Man," starring Oscar winners Russell Crowe and Renee Zellweger, took only 61 million dollars, while Ridley Scott's crusade epic "Kingdom of Heaven," which cost 130 million dollars to make, reaped only 47 million at the all-important domestic the box office.

Other fizzlers that did not recoup their budgets included the much-touted sci-fi flop "The Island," which hauled in only 35 million dollars, while Jamie Foxx's military drama "Stealth" bombed with a US and Canadian haul of 31 million dollars. It quickly disappeared from screens.

"Movie goers are very picky and they want the price of the ticket to be worthwhile, the studios had to offer more," said Gitesh Pandya of movie industry tracker Box Office Guru.

"There should be more creativity and new ideas, not just sequels and remake. Let's hope Hollywood listens to the audiences," he added.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: barebackmountain; boxoffice; harrypotter; hollyweird; hollywoodleftists; homosexualagenda; narnia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last
To: All
In addition, Hollywood faces a major external threat: runaway production costs, the growing trend of movie producers to shoot in places such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand to cash in on much lower staff and production charges.

The main problem I see is the salaries they are paying the top actors.

41 posted on 12/13/2005 11:50:43 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

.....Every Year they record, record profits.....

I don't think so. They pay their actors and others some of their compensation on the net. If there is no net they keep it all themselves. The trick is to spend all the revenue doen to the wire so there are no profits.


42 posted on 12/13/2005 11:51:15 AM PST by bert (K.E. ; N.P . Franks in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Millee

What? You're not gonna go see " ButtCrack Mountain ? "


43 posted on 12/13/2005 11:52:16 AM PST by MAWG (In the shadows, on permanent ambush duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jailbird
Underworld Sequel with Kate Beckinsale.. Yum!!!

I actually wouldn't call that B, the original had a great artistic quality.
44 posted on 12/13/2005 11:52:21 AM PST by mnehring ("Everybody better celebrate the holidays my way or shut the hell up." The Christmas spirit lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Millee

If Hollywood only had a good gay cowboy movie to bail them out.....


45 posted on 12/13/2005 11:52:24 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon

I love many of the B movies. Watch them on Turner whenever I can. I agree that Hollywood doesn't turn out enough good movies. We have a home theater and love to watch movies there, but we still like to go see good movies when they're released. We plan to see Narnia and King Kong at the theater. If there were other good movies, we'd go see them too. But then, we're not from the young male audience, so I guess what we like doesn't count.


46 posted on 12/13/2005 11:52:39 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dreagon

The B movies are going straight to cable. So all they got is blockbusters and so called "important films".


47 posted on 12/13/2005 11:53:00 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: p. henry
Good point....

When I'm working at home, I'm reminded of WHY watching movies on DVD is preferable to going to a theater.

I can watch the movie at my own convenience, stop for phone calls, or work sessions, go potty when I need too, eat my own food, curl up in front of the fireplace and replay scenes I really like :)
48 posted on 12/13/2005 11:53:26 AM PST by najida (Cruelty, mockery, ridicule; the weapon of sanctimonious bullies too stupid to recognize insults ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Just after the '92 elections,a survey showed that the movers and shakers of the MSM went for BillyBob 89%,whereas the nation as a whole went 43% for him.In recent years the influence of the MSM has plummeted (newspaper circulation,network newscasts,etc).

Coincidence?

If not,is there a lesson to be learned here by the movers and shakers,and the major actors,in Hollywood?

49 posted on 12/13/2005 11:53:36 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Simple answer, make movies, not political statements.

To simple for them.

50 posted on 12/13/2005 11:53:45 AM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Exhibit #987 in the case that Hollywood has lost its creativity is the latest remake to hit the theaters, Fun With Dick and Jane.

-PJ

51 posted on 12/13/2005 11:53:46 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Millee

Perhaps these $20-$30 million per flick movie stars ain't worth what they pay them.


52 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:03 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior_G

No no no! Sequels! That'll get'em! Cheaper by the Dozen II!





Actually, I am looking forward to the next Pirates of the Caribbean movie next July. :p


53 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:07 AM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
It's filled with liberals who despise people like me, so I make a conscious effort to return the favor by not patronizing their products.

I'm with you 100%!

54 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:19 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

No, he made exactly ONE great film (He was incredible in "Ray"), and now he thinks he's God's gift to the world, and has gone off the deep end with ol' Tookie-bird.

Personally, I'm sick of movies where the male lead is a girly-man led around by the nose by his super-strong, but still sensitive woman. If that's what Hollyweird thinks of the American male, I will continue to vote with my feet and do other things than visit the movie houses...


55 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:26 AM PST by ssaftler (Politically Correct isn't! Progressives aren't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Millee

"The Passion of The Christ" set the bar to a level Hollywood cannot see, much less attain. Notice this movie isn't mentioned in this article?


56 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:37 AM PST by Fielding ("Others have died for my freedom, now this is my mark" Cpl. Jeffrey B. Starr")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fintan

..classics

57 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:39 AM PST by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Millee
Hollywood and the theaters are doing their best to chase customers away by insisting on showing 20 commercials before the movie starts.

People have paid their money to be entertained, not subject to sales pitches.

58 posted on 12/13/2005 11:54:55 AM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAWG
What? You're not gonna go see " ButtCrack Mountain ? "

Hmmm, I thought it was called 'Buttcrack Mountin'...

59 posted on 12/13/2005 11:55:08 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

I just IMDB'd (?) Jamie Foxx, and he played Tookie Williams in a movie about Tookie Williams. The comments on the page are interesting in light of recent events.


60 posted on 12/13/2005 11:55:09 AM PST by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson