Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Judge Upholds Rush Limbaugh's Doctor-Patient Confidentiality
PRNewswire via COMTEX ^ | 12/12/05 | Roy Black

Posted on 12/12/2005 2:30:51 PM PST by M. Thatcher

MIAMI, Dec 12, 2005 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Roy Black, Rush Limbaugh's attorney, issued the following statement regarding Judge David F. Crow's decision today prohibiting prosecutors from asking the talk show host's doctors about his medical treatment and condition or information he shared with his doctors during his care and treatment.

Judge Crow's ruling upholds our argument that the State cannot breach doctor-patient confidentiality just because it has obtained some medical records, and thus the state cannot ask the doctors its questions posed to the court during the hearing.

Judge Crow's decision prohibits the State from questioning Mr. Limbaugh's physicians about "the medical condition of the patient and any information disclosed to the healthcare practitioner by the patient in the course of the care and treatment of the patient."

We are pleased with the court's ruling upholding the patient's statutory right of doctor-patient confidentiality. We've said from the start that there was no doctor shopping but Mr. Limbaugh should not have to give up his right to doctor-patient confidentiality to prove his innocence.

The medical records that the State has seized and reviewed now for nearly six months show that Mr. Limbaugh received legitimate medical treatment for legitimate medical reasons. Mr. Limbaugh has not been charged with a crime and he should not be charged.

SOURCE Roy Black

Tony Knight, or Tammy Taylor, both of Sitrick And Company, +1-310-788-2850, for Roy Black

http://www.prnewswire.com

Copyright (C) 2005 PR Newswire. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: davidfcrow; dhpl; goodjudge; hero; limbaugh; royblack; ruling; rush; rushlimbaugh; victoryfordruggies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-235 next last
To: epow

Do you really think that? Most Freepers I have heard all seem to be on Rush' side. I am anyway. :)


161 posted on 12/12/2005 10:06:47 PM PST by cubreporter (I trust Rush. He has done more for this country than anyone will ever know. He's A++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
Then you can't hear. It is a well known fact (even among freepers) that he said that.

Oh, STFU. I've listened to the man for 15 years and he's never said any such thing. You're just repeating what some DU moron has told you, making you yet another useful idiot of the dims.

You have no evidence so you resort to slander and condescending insults. Rush supporters don't "worship" the man--we've got his back, against fatuous, contemptible, holier-than-thou POS.

Some knight--perhaps you can get the silent part right.

162 posted on 12/12/2005 10:34:52 PM PST by youngjim (Time wounds all heels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
As someone who has been in Pain Management since 1996, my records are sent to Richond for the Dinosaurs on the Medical Review Board to read, in case they decide to prosecute my Doctor for prescribing the drugs I take...

Wow..that's just ridiculous. So what's next, review of who buys a pack of sudafed for the common cold (to counter the meth labs)? I'm sure some dim proposing that right now.

163 posted on 12/12/2005 10:53:23 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: silentknight

How is he a hypocrite?


164 posted on 12/13/2005 12:05:04 AM PST by Choozer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Good for Rush! Yipee!

Mega Dittoes...and as Rush himself would say, "YIP, YIP, YIP, YAHOOEY!"....

165 posted on 12/13/2005 12:19:10 AM PST by FDNYRHEROES (Liberals are not optimistic; they are delusional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: youngjim
....repeating what some DU moron has told you, making you yet another useful idiot of the dims.... LOL!!

There are a lot of RUSH haters here, makes one wonder!! (See my tag line)

166 posted on 12/13/2005 1:58:51 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave ("Liberals out of power are comical-Liberals in power are dangerous!"-Rush Limbaugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek

Court this week

A.A.C.


167 posted on 12/13/2005 2:09:08 AM PST by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

" All poor guy did is getting his maid to buy him illegal drugs..."

Where's your proof, dirtbag?


168 posted on 12/13/2005 2:16:13 AM PST by RadioCirca1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; All
Crosslinked:

-That "Rush" to Judgment- Limbaugh Links--

I have, from the beginning, believed this case to be one of political persecution.

169 posted on 12/13/2005 2:45:18 AM PST by backhoe (The Silence of the Tom's ( Tired Old Media... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: RadioCirca1970

And the silence from TheRepublican is deafening....


170 posted on 12/13/2005 3:09:37 AM PST by westmichman (I vote Republican for the children and the poor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
So is this the end of the case against Rush?

No. The prosecutor immediately filed a request to vivisection Mr. Limbaugh in order to find evidence of his medical condition. His motion states that without looking literally into Mr. Limbaugh, the state cannot determine if a crime has been committed.

171 posted on 12/13/2005 3:18:49 AM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

Interesting. Rush's website has removed his page dedicated to this court battle. Wonder what that means?


172 posted on 12/13/2005 3:23:57 AM PST by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmericanArchConservative

Court this week

Thanks


173 posted on 12/13/2005 4:04:36 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

It's about time, otherwise what good would all the expense of instituting HIPAA be for patients?


174 posted on 12/13/2005 4:23:57 AM PST by stopem (Merry CHRISTmas to ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

Upon hearing this news in DUmmieland, Skinner wept.


175 posted on 12/13/2005 4:28:41 AM PST by PJ-Comix (Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silentknight
I used to worship Rush and then he did this. Lost total creditability with me.

Even heroes are human.......My "guess" is that there are millions that have suffered similar weaknesses....but not you...you extra-special I have never been weak person.

176 posted on 12/13/2005 5:09:32 AM PST by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: epow

oops should have been 146,


177 posted on 12/13/2005 5:21:29 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

I think it means it is over or old news.

Now I want to see the Florida Bar proceed on the complaint against the prosecutor.


178 posted on 12/13/2005 5:23:25 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Its effectively over. What they really wanted to do was look at those confidential parts of the records to fish for evidence of a possible crime. That request was denied. Oh sure, they're saying they'll question his doctors and nurses but they won't find out beyond what they already know. The Palm Beach D.A's office is just putting spin on a ruling that for practical intents and purposes is the end of their bid to get Rush Limbaugh. If they didn't find it after looking at his medical records, where do you think their questioning the medical staff will give it to them? The patient is not required to waive his confidentiality to maintain his innocence. That's it in a nutshell here.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

179 posted on 12/13/2005 5:31:19 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

At last a judge who upholds the laws on the books.


180 posted on 12/13/2005 6:20:36 AM PST by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-235 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson