WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.

Hillary will not win the White House, she will not even win the Democratic primary. She has to come to the right in order to gain more ground than Kerry did and she cannot without disenfranchised her base which is extremely Liberal and controlled by moveon.org which is funded by the likes of Soros who is comparable to Michael Moore.

Joe Lieberman would be their best chance but the party has become extremely radical and has excommunicated him from the base.

I predict the likes of Howard Dean or his equal to be nominated and skunked in the national elections of '08.

Welcome to FreeRepublic!

Senator Santorum (RINO-PA) wants to give/follow the UN guidelines and give a fixed % of our GDP to global charity.

Santorum:

The U.S. has been giving foreign aide for many years. The giving of foreign aide has nothing to do with any U.N. guidelines and for the most part has nothing to do with the U.N. It has everything to do with making the world a safer place for the United States.

You misrepresent what Santorum says. You make it sound like Santorum wants the U.S. to contribute to some U.N. tithing scheme. Your cricism of Santorum is specious.

BTW, foreign aide as a percentage of GDP is at an all time low.

Link

Thank you.

Here are a few: For Grassley, his own home page where he said: "In September I wrote the president to request additional LIHEAP funds to address what is likely to be a shortage in funding assistance this winter season for thousands of households." Source: http://grassley.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=CapitolGains.Detail&CapitolGain_id=311&Year=2005 Also, Grassley said: "Sen. Charles Grassley (news, bio, voting record), R-Iowa, said in a letter to API that the industry should devote part of its profits to a federal home heating assistance program. It was an ominous note since Grassley chairs the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee"

A socialist policy, yes. But understand that Grassley is a politician, not a philosopher. It is clearly seen in these links that Grassley is bragging about his support of these things. Why does he do this??

Try looking at the voters of Iowa (similar to other states) to see where the problem is. Try looking at the voters across the country.

bttt

[ It will boil down to voting fraud that we cannot let happen that will determine whether miss hillary gets her toes into the white house. I'm sure the left machine is working on this as we speak. ]

Exactly.. However, I think your overlooking the ditzablity of non lefist women and RINO women.. and of course the Harpocrites, you know Oprahs troops.. Many, no, MOST here thought Bubba wouldnt be elected either...

Considering that the republican party in total could care less about massive widespread voter fraud don't look good either.

Not only that but many who hate Hillary LOVE Bill.. and they know where ever Hillary goes, so goes Bill.. This is underestimated and is a serious error.. Just the thought of Bill Clinton back into the White House flying in the face of the intent of the 2 terms rule will attract not a few..

"If voting fraud pushes her over the top, she will have won. Republicans don't fight back. The only hope is fractionalized groups becoming cohesive. Miami Cubans, FReepers, Minutemen all banding together might save us."

How about a suicide martyr? Surely the smartest woman in the world is worth 1,000 times a "normal" person. 72,000 virgins await. I just checked the koran and there is a special sewer-rat in there for the cloven footed one. s/off

bump

BRAVO BUMP!!!!!!!

The first step was to identify the critical swing vote: white women.

Devising a plan to target them is step two. The group you are talking about is a subgroup of this group and will be addressed when we target white women.

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

Mia T
Sen. KnowNothing Victim ClintonEffectively
Pleads 5TH in Press Conference by Invoking Spousal Privilege

In August 1999 Clinton pardoned 16 FALN terrorists without even being asked, in a move that was widely seen as a cynical ploy to win Hispanic votes for his wife's New York senate bid.

In a bone chilling chapter of her new book "The Final Days," late heroine-author Barbara Olson warned that ex-president Bill Clinton's pardons of terrorists who had repeatedly bombed buildings in New York City "send a signal" that the U.S. isn't serious about fighting terrorism.

In words that now seem like a harbinger of her own Sept. 11 death at the hands of the Middle Eastern terrorists, Olson cited example after example of how U.S. officials strenuously warned Clinton that pardoning FALN Puerto Rican separatists who had waged their own bombing jihad on America posed a threat to national security.

In August 1999 Clinton pardoned 16 FALN terrorists without even being asked, in a move that was widely seen as a cynical ploy to win Hispanic votes for his wife's New York senate bid.

The group had planned and executed 130 bombing attacks on New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C. from 1974 to 1983. Miraculously, the FALN managed to kill just six Americans. But hundreds more were seriously wounded.

Law enforcement officials were stunned when Clinton decided to pardon the FALN bombers.

"The FBI's assistant director of national security, Neil Gallagher, said that the people turned loose by Clinton 'are criminals, and they are terrorists, and they represent a threat to the United States,'" Olson wrote.

In a subchapter eerily headlined "Pardons for Terrorists Send a Signal," she reported:

"President Clinton had not bothered to consult with relatives of victims of FALN terrorism. In fact, the survivors of those murdered and those whose lives had otherwise been destroyed by the terrorists were not even informed that their attackers were being released."

Olson continued:

"Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder.... conceded that the nation owed much greater consideration to the victims. And Holder's boss, Janet Reno, explicitly acknowledged that groups aligned with the FALN still posed a threat to national security."

In comments turned gut-wrenching in light of last month's attacks, former Justice Department pardon attorney Margaret Love told the late author that Clinton's terrorist pardons should have set off alarm bells.

"We should have seen a big flashing red light because of the FALN cases.... That was a foreshoadowing of what happened later."

Love was referring to Clinton's January 2001 pardons of drug dealers and international fugitives, not the attacks on the U.S., which no one foresaw. But it's nearly impossible now to read those words as anything but prophesy of the terrorist acts that murdered Olson and nearly 6,000 others last month.

In a moment of now legendary heroism, the late author telephoned her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, from American Flight 175 to warn that terrorists had hijacked her plane. Mr. Olson had the terrible task of telling his wife that two planes had slammed into New York's World Trade Center minutes before.

Barbara Olson's phone call was the first warning the government had that Washington, D.C. had come under similar attack.

In comments sure to irk those who argued for eight years that Bill Clinton's private life was nobody else's business, the late author contends that the terrorist pardons were payback for Mrs. Clinton indulging her husband's decades of rampant philandering.

"Hillary had done a lot of heavy lifting for her husband, much of it, such as the various bimbo eruptions, that required her to hold her nose. She had to cover for her husband and lie."

Olson called the FALN pardons Bill Clinton's "first return on her investment."

Though a lively debate has raged ever since Sept. 11 over whether the ex-president did as much as he could to stop Osama bin Laden, the one-time congressional Clinton investigator is the first to raise the FALN pardon question at any length.

Perhaps now Sen. Clinton, who has made herself newly available on the TV talk show circuit since the World Trade Center attacks, will be asked whether she agrees with Olson that her husband's terrorist pardons "sent a signal."

Olson Book's Chilling Warning: Clinton's Terrorist Pardons Sent Signal
Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
News Max
Oct. 14, 2001

Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC <-> DNA sequencing.

In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

Mia T, THE ALIENS
June, 1999

play tape

Voter fraud, again!

Stop the presses! I mean it. Stop the election!

Something is going on in Washington and California that will have a great impact on tomorrow's election -- and it stinks to high heaven.

Let me start by telling you how I found out about it.

A very good friend of mine, who shall remain nameless, has a long-time live-in housekeeper from Guatemala. The housekeeper has a daughter who just turned 18. The immigration status of both mother and daughter has been pending for years. Papers have been filed with the Immigration and Naturalization Service. Hearings have been held. But they are not citizens.

This is very important: The daughter has not registered to vote.

But, a few days ago, the 18-year-old got a very attractively packaged "Dear friend" letter from Bill Clinton, paid for by the California Democratic Party.

Here's what it said (on one side in Spanish and on the other side in English): "While every election is important, the November 7th election will determine our future for the next decade, and beyond. The stakes are high for America's Latino families. And California is the critical battleground.

"That's why I'm writing. We need your help to elect a Democratic Congress.

"Despite our strong economy, many hard-working people still struggle to make ends meet. Quality, affordable health care, a world-class education, aging with dignity, and well-paid jobs are part of the American dream -- rather than an American reality -- for too many people.

"Electing a Democratic Congress is essential for our 'Families First' legislative agenda.

"Congratulations on your decision to register. Registering to vote is a basic responsibility of citizenship that far too many people ignore.

"Now that you are registered ...

"Can I count on you to vote Democratic on November 7th?
"Will you make an extra effort to elect Democrats to Congress -- and to your State Legislature -- by talking to your family, friends and neighbors?

"Remember: Your Vote is Your Voice.

"Su Voz, Es Su Voto. Make your voice heard on Election Day.

"Sincerely, President Bill Clinton"

Below that letter is a P.S. that explains: "Here is your personal Voter Identification Card. Sign your name, then detach your card. Bring your card with you to your polling place on Election Day. It will help your voting go more smoothly."

Apparently all the recipient needs to do with this Voter Identification Card is sign it to be eligible to vote. Keep in mind, this was sent to a previously unregistered voter.

As my friend points out, only the U.S. government knows her age and pending residency status, and, obviously her Latino background. How did this information wind up in the partisan political hands of the California Democratic Party? And what kind of impact will a mailing like this -- obviously utilizing a government database for political purposes -- have on the California legislative races? How widespread is this fraud?

This is making my head spin. The recipient of this letter happens to live in congressional and state legislative districts that are very hotly contested in Southern California. But this appears to be a statewide mailing from the Democratic Party headquarters in Sacramento.

It's mind-boggling. The fraud is so blatant. Yet, not a peep out of the Republicans. They apparently won't even know what hit them. The polls in recent days show them making big gains in this once-invulnerable Al Gore stronghold state. A mass mailing like this effectively registering tens of thousands of potential Democratic voters days before the election is a secret weapon held back deliberately to avoid detection, scrutiny and publicity. After the election, the party will be happy to pay a fine for any illegalities involved. Clinton will be out of office and untouchable as always. There will be a new regime in at the INS. And it will all be swept under the rug.

And who knows if this technique is not being deployed by other state Democratic Party units? I don't doubt it for a minute.

This is voter fraud, pure and simple. And those responsible include the president of the United States, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, possibly the Census Bureau and certainly the California Democratic Party.

I'm outraged. Are you?

SENATORS FOR VOTE FRAUD

By ARNOLD ALHERT

October 19, 2002 -- IT'S more than a little ironic. On the same day it was announced that Saddam Hussein has been "unanimously" re-elected, the only two senators preventing a unanimous vote in the Senate on the election-reform bill were New York's own Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.

Why? "This would make it more difficult to vote in New York. It's designed to suppress minority voting participation," said Sen. Clinton.

The "this" Sen. Clinton is referring to is the new anti-fraud provisions in the bill. They require that every person wanting to vote show a driver's license, Social Security number or other approved ID in order to cast a ballot.

Clinton and Schumer preferred a system where a potential voter merely had to sign his or her name.

So who is it exactly that this bill is "suppressing"? U.S. citizens have all the requisite ID - no matter what their ethnicity. Could it be that Clinton and Schumer are "sensitive" to some of the leftist fringe groups in this country who are clamoring for the right of illegal aliens to vote?

It is no secret that New York is home to thousands of undocumented "residents" - who would vote overwhelmingly Democratic if they could just get past these darn ID requirements.

New York's dynamic duo have a lot more 'splainin' to do on this one.

E-mail: ahlert@mindspring.com

Clinton's psychological problem was evident when he talked about September 11 in terms of the "politics of personal destruction." According to Schippers, "Clinton believes that the whole world revolves around the feelings of William Jefferson Clinton."

We talked about politics in general and the Democratic Party in particular. He was sad to admit that the party he supported during most of his lifetime cares about one thing only --- retaining power. Their issues involve scaring people. That's all they can do. Scare people. Schippers talked about a 1998 recording of Hillary Clinton in which she tried to get out the vote by telling her minions that she had inside information about the Republicans plan to "close down all of welfare..."

There is a difference in the parties that is paramount. The Democrats have no sense of shame. Schippers commented on the role of the media in the shameless activities of the Democrats. "The media is the bad guy," he said.

Regarding the illegal activities in pushing alien criminals to become citizens in 1996, Schippers really wanted to go after that case. They were ready to take the next step and was told that he had the support of the FBI. He believed that U.S. Attorneys were going to file criminal charges against those involved. But it was all suddenly shut down.

David Schippers
FREEPER EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW:
| 4-02-02 | Doug from Upland

The clintons' refinement of the DNC "drag and drop," a vote fraud technique by which unwitting, unwilling and/or illegal blacks are coerced into voting multiple times, is not merely illegal and exploitive. It is racist.

Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing.

In the senate race against Rick Lazio, it is widely understood that the "drag and drop," (followed by the OLD ANGLE / NEW SQUARE / OVAL OFFICE SCHEME ) was clinton's vote fraud technique of choice used to overcome her low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures.

Mia T
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
(clinton legacy of lynching update)

Rosen, 38, who was Clinton's national finance director, is accused of repeatedly misleading the FEC about contributions for the star-studded Los Angeles gala on Aug. 12, 2000.
He is charged with three counts of concealing campaign contributions and faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted....
The defense led off their case in the afternoon by calling Harold Ickes, who was the mastermind behind Clinton's Senate victory and hired Rosen to raise funds for the campaign.
"We all thought David did a very good job in what he was doing," Ickes testified.
Ickes, who described himself as keeping a close eye on the campaign's coffers, said he held Rosen in "high regard" and called him a "good worker."
Ickes wrapped up by defending the gala, which netted a paltry $57,820....
HILL PAL IS CASH COWED
NEW YORK POST
(this is an excerpt)
NICOLE CAMPBELL: hillary's Mastermind's Eye Insufficiently Close to Spy FEC Lie?
(and why hasn't the demonstrably biased, clinton-appointed judge recused himself, anyway)

"My client had nothing to do with the low-rent, trailer-park trash politicians who infested our country for the past eight years."

--Michael Rosen, lawyer for Thomas Gambino, son of late Mafia boss Carlo Gambino
New York Post via The Wall Street Journal

(Michael Rosen was understandably eager to distance his client, a convicted loan shark, from the clintons. Another Thomas Gambino reportedly paid $50,000 to roger clinton in an unsuccessful effort to get a pardon for his father, Rosario Gambino.),

It's not easy to play fair against Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, who, in the words of the authors, "operated like a crime family, expecting friends and aides to protect them even against their own best interests." What's amazing, of course, is that's exactly what Clinton friends and aides have always done, from Susan McDougal to Webster Hubbell to flocks of nameless White House special assistants. Even Jim McDougal died just in time to deprive the independent counsel of a key witness against Mrs. Clinton, thus derailing what the authors report to have been her likely indictment for perjury and obstruction related to the Whitewater investigation.... Reading the tumultuous events of the Lewinsky probe in a comprehensive narrative is unlike attempting to make sense of it in daily doses. Something different comes through the heavy accumulation of detail of, for example, the duplicity of the Justice Department, or the sharklike behavior of the White House. One begins to get a choking sense of the atmosphere of corruption and ruthlessness the Clintons inhabit -- and, worse, have forced the rest of us to inhabit. Taken in one piece, the habitual, even casual abuse of power on display begins to resemble conditions one normally associates with a state of totalitarianism, where such concepts as truth and justice are only paid lip service. In the end, then, it makes you wonder when there will be fresh air again.
Crime-family values

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.
Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering,
Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

Thank you for all that background.

Keep 'em coming Mia! There is enough amunition here to bring a house down.

Thank you for all your hard work. Very appreciated.

Regards,

you're welcome... and WELCOME! :)

thanx :)

If Republicans put up a defective candidate and then focus on keeping HRC out at any cost, we will LOSE. Republicans must put up a morally strong candidate we can rally around regardless of what the 'rats do.

I concur with your astute and accurate analysis. Let's hope enough of the GOP primary voters can think as rationally and elect George Allen, or (Mike Pence if he decides to run) as the nominee.
Allen, or Pence, would produce an electoral landslide win. A pro-abort, pro-homosexual, pro-tax, anti-gun rights advocate, such as Rudy Giuliani, would without a doubt lose vs. HRC.

'Probably wouldn't have an impact because those states are already blue and would not change the electoral outcome.'

What about voter fraud in the red states? The Rats stop at nothing.

Both of those men are fine people. I would vote for them. But I would also vote for Giuliani. Heck, I would vote for you, jla. ;)

( The vote will be split ONLY IF WE SPLIT IT.)

I still say when push comes to shove, you will not place that de facto vote for missus clinton by either voting for a third party or sitting out the election.