Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Conservatives Want End to Birthright Citizenship
Human Events ^ | 12/9/05 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 12/09/2005 11:22:39 AM PST by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2005 11:22:40 AM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; A CA Guy; ...

ping


2 posted on 12/09/2005 11:23:39 AM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
End birthright citizenship for illegal aliens

This is huge in my opinion.

3 posted on 12/09/2005 11:24:31 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

And make it retroactive to 1980!


4 posted on 12/09/2005 11:24:37 AM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That would be an ex post facto law.


5 posted on 12/09/2005 11:25:31 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

BINGO!! // DO ALL OF THE ABOVE.


6 posted on 12/09/2005 11:25:36 AM PST by Lowell (The voice from beyond the edge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Yup - the Anchor Baby syndrome is a huge loophole in illegal immigration.


7 posted on 12/09/2005 11:25:39 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Make unlawful presence in the U.S. a felony

Another key element.

8 posted on 12/09/2005 11:25:55 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
That would be an ex post facto law.

But retroactive tax increases aren't?...........

9 posted on 12/09/2005 11:26:31 AM PST by Red Badger (Dan rather didn't say "Courage", he said "Couric"..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"And make it retroactive to 1980!"

That's a big 'no-no' in American law. See Article I Sec 9 US Constitution: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
10 posted on 12/09/2005 11:27:40 AM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I'd like to see it, but this might make negotiating difficult--unless it's a throwaway card. It would be very difficult to change a law this old.

A back-up position might be to allow for citizenship, but to require the parents to return, and disallow the partents rec'ing any benefits from the anchor.

Wow...this'd sure make a difference at the Thomason Gen OB in El Paso!!

11 posted on 12/09/2005 11:29:08 AM PST by Mamzelle (The best offense-- is the unbeatable defense...Darrell K. Royal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
"But retroactive tax increases aren't?..........."

Ex Post Facto generally refers to laws that are criminally punitive. In other words, we criminalize something that's currently legal, then go back and prosecute everyone who did it while it was still legal. I agree that retroactive tax increases are horrible in principle, I don't think a Constitutional challenge to them would hold.
12 posted on 12/09/2005 11:30:59 AM PST by NJ_gent (Modernman should not have been banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
Theres Conservatives in the house?!?!?


/sarc.
13 posted on 12/09/2005 11:31:46 AM PST by HHKrepublican_2 (OP Spread the Truth....http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1535158/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
House conservatives today announced plans to amend a Republican-sponsored immigration reform bill with language calling for the construction of a 2,000-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border and a provision that would deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. whose parents aren’t citizens.

This should have been done yesterday. Any hopes of a guest worker program, even if it's only limited to agriculture must end anchor babies and seal the borders if they expect it to get sufficient support from the general public.

14 posted on 12/09/2005 11:34:48 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I am ALL for it!

Lets start flooding the phonelines to Washington and get this thing rolling.

15 posted on 12/09/2005 11:37:45 AM PST by johnny7 (“You have a corpse in a car, minus a head, in the garage. Take me to it.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Excellent. This is a huge part of the problem. They know that once they have a baby here they will never be deported and they will eventually be able to sponsor the rest of their family to join them. We're providing a huge incentive for people to immigrate here illegally.
16 posted on 12/09/2005 11:38:43 AM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Sounds great, where do I sign?


17 posted on 12/09/2005 11:39:59 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

" But retroactive tax increases aren't?..........."

Are they allowed to pass retroactive taxes? I would think that would be unconstitutional.


18 posted on 12/09/2005 11:41:17 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

How do they plan on getting around that little ole 14th Amendment to the Constitution thingy that says, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside"?

Are they talking Constitutional amendment?


19 posted on 12/09/2005 11:42:24 AM PST by seowulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HHKrepublican_2

"Theres Conservatives in the house?!?!?"


They let a few token conservatives in but they have to sit in the back and stay quiet. /not totally sarcastic


20 posted on 12/09/2005 11:42:54 AM PST by gondramB ( We don't get no government loan and no one sends a check from home-we just do what what we wanna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson