Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor declines to charge LAPD officer who shot black teen
AP ^ | 12/5/5

Posted on 12/05/2005 12:50:42 PM PST by SmithL

Los Angeles -- The district attorney's office announced Monday that no charges will be filed against the police officer involved in the February shooting death of a 13-year-old boy who rammed a stolen vehicle into a patrol car after a short chase.

The early morning shooting of Devin Brown on Feb. 6 sparked protests in the South Los Angeles area where the shooting occurred.

The Los Angeles Police Department sent its findings to the district attorney's office Aug. 5 for a decision on whether to prosecute Officer Steven Garcia, the officer who shot the black teen.

District Attorney Steve Cooley, in a 21-page report, said there was "insufficient evidence to initiate criminal proceedings against Officer Steven Garcia for the death of Devin B. As a result of these findings, we are closing our file and will take no further action in this matter."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: deadcriminal; herocop; urbanbarbarians
Good call.
1 posted on 12/05/2005 12:50:42 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just gotta mention 'black teen'. Can't write an article without it. Too bad he wasn't a Gay Black teen, that would have been a real coup for the paper.....


2 posted on 12/05/2005 12:53:05 PM PST by InsureAmerica (Evil? I have many words for it. We are as dust, to them. - v v putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

civil suit to follow ?


3 posted on 12/05/2005 12:53:09 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The boy's killing prompted Chief William Bratton to quickly issue a revised shooting policy for moving vehicles that had long been in the works. The new policy bans firing at a vehicle unless something other than the vehicle is a threat.

Because everybody knows that if you are killed by a vehicle you aren't nearly as dead as if you were killed with a gun. /sarcasm

4 posted on 12/05/2005 12:55:11 PM PST by Antonello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What time do the riots and looting start? I want a new plasma tv........


5 posted on 12/05/2005 12:55:38 PM PST by Red Badger (Dan rather didn't say "Courage", he said "Couric"..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"in a 21-page report,"?????


A) He attacked me with A CAR!!!!
B) Why do you issue me a weapon?
6 posted on 12/05/2005 12:56:43 PM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me

What about a policy that allows shooting SUVs on sight? I'm sure the lefties would go for that.

7 posted on 12/05/2005 1:02:47 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I hear a rumble in the distance and it's coming closer. Keeping popcorn handy.


8 posted on 12/05/2005 1:03:08 PM PST by La Enchiladita (New tagline under construction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Well, at least there is one less dirtbag off the streets. I am talking about the car thief/attempted murderer who got shot by this excellent officer.


9 posted on 12/05/2005 1:03:36 PM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antonello

"The new policy bans firing at a vehicle unless something other than the vehicle is a threat."

And passenger jets taken over by terrorists are not dangerous either (just the terrorist). Please do not shoot down the plane, it has not done anything to you!


10 posted on 12/05/2005 1:06:20 PM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

---Just what I was thinking. Christmas is coming and they gotta have gifts!


11 posted on 12/05/2005 1:11:39 PM PST by WasDougsLamb (I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Wasn't this on "West Wing" last night?


12 posted on 12/05/2005 1:18:45 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WasDougsLamb

Santa Claws is comin' to town!........


13 posted on 12/05/2005 1:27:45 PM PST by Red Badger (Dan rather didn't say "Courage", he said "Couric"..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
They should charge this kids parents with neglect. Just my opinion.
14 posted on 12/05/2005 1:48:01 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YouPosting2Me

"The new policy bans firing at a vehicle unless something other than the vehicle is a threat."


Well the cops can do what THEY want but if I'M ever deliberatly charged by a driver and I have a gun that sucka's gonna get shot--between the eyes if possible.


15 posted on 12/05/2005 2:48:37 PM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Charge him with what??? Doing his job?


16 posted on 12/05/2005 3:19:55 PM PST by BurbankKarl (NRA EPL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson