1 posted on
12/05/2005 11:29:28 AM PST by
kingattax
To: kingattax
To: kingattax
I'm offended. I like krystals..........
3 posted on
12/05/2005 11:30:36 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Dan rather didn't say "Courage", he said "Couric"..................)
To: kingattax
Who's the red crystal for? Washed up New Agers?
To: kingattax
Since the Red Cross is in no way a religious organization, I think they should adopt the Red Diamond for all operations, and do away with the cross and crescent altogether.
5 posted on
12/05/2005 11:31:53 AM PST by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: kingattax
Who cares? They can be the red swastica for all I care. I know two things:
They are red... as in commie red.
And they'll never get a nickel of my money.
6 posted on
12/05/2005 11:32:08 AM PST by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: kingattax
Did someone say Krystal?
7 posted on
12/05/2005 11:32:13 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: kingattax
8 posted on
12/05/2005 11:32:28 AM PST by
jjm2111
(99.7 FM Radio Kuwait - Whatever you do, don't say the 'C' word!"_)
To: kingattax
You mean they won't sue us for putting red crosses on our 1st aid kits any more?
9 posted on
12/05/2005 11:33:08 AM PST by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker!)
To: kingattax
What about all of those swiss army knives?
10 posted on
12/05/2005 11:33:22 AM PST by
billhilly
(John Murtha, ex Marine. Leading the charge of the Demoquits.)
To: kingattax
I must confess a certain fondness for the Red Triangle...
17 posted on
12/05/2005 11:37:16 AM PST by
gridlock
(eliminate perverse incentives)
To: kingattax; gridlock
The Israeli emergency service refuses to use either of the two globally recognised symbols, opting instead for a red Star of David.Duh! That would be because the "two globally recognized symbols" are both explicit symbols of specific religions that are in major theological conflict with Judaism. It would make more sense for the IFRC to get rid of the "two globally recognized symbols" and replace them with something totally non-sectarian. Keeping those two and then adding a "crystal" box for Israel to squish its religious symbol into, isn't much of an improvement IMO. Why shouldn't the cross and crescent have to be squished inside "crystals" too?
To: kingattax
No to the Red Cross & United Way!
Yes to The Boy Scouts of America!
To: kingattax
Just another reason to donate to the Salvation Army.
21 posted on
12/05/2005 11:38:30 AM PST by
Churchillspirit
(Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
To: kingattax
I wonder how much all this silliness cost taxpayers? Nothing, I hope, but doubt.
25 posted on
12/05/2005 11:39:06 AM PST by
Owl558
(Pardon my spelling)
To: kingattax
33 posted on
12/05/2005 11:49:23 AM PST by
GunnyHartman
(Allah is allah outta virgins.)
To: kingattax
To: kingattax
Wow...a 1984 moment for sure.
35 posted on
12/05/2005 11:52:53 AM PST by
BureaucratusMaximus
(The 2005 Chicago White Sox---World Series Champs---WOO! HOO!)
To: kingattax
If it is offensive for the Red Cross to use the cross as a symbol, why isn't it also offensive for Switzerland to have a cross on its flag? When is Switzerland going to change its flag?
For that matter, the following countries also need to remove crosses from their flags: Australia, Denmark, Fiji, Finland, Georgia, Greece, Iceland, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Tonga, Tuvalu, and the United Kingdom. I'm not sure if the white space on the Dominican Republic flag is supposed to be a cross, but maybe they should remove it to be safe.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
