Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicanism in decline [Normally Mild-Mannered Tony Snow Hits GOP "Packed with Cowards]
Townhall.com ^ | Tony Snow

Posted on 12/03/2005 6:27:44 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

By Tony Snow

Dec 3, 2005

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- When Democrats gibber about Republicans' writhing in a culture of corruption, they're on to something -- but not what they think. The Republican Party in Washington is in trouble not because it's overrun by crooks, but because it's packed with cowards -- and has degenerated into a caricature of the party that swept to power 11 years ago promising to take on the federal bureaucracy and liberate the creative genius of American society.

The collapse stems from the simplest and most natural of causes, the survival instinct. Within months of seizing power in 1995, Republicans began backing away from Big Ideas, from tort reform to the necessary overhaul of the Social Security system. They started consulting pollsters to assay "correct" issues and positions. They played it safe -- or so they thought.

Over time, imagination-grabbing ideas melted away. Gone was the Reaganite breadth of vision, and in its place stood the musty idol of Incumbency. Republicans drew the wrong morals from the decline and fall of Newt Gingrich. They thought his boldness got him in trouble, and chose to crib plays from the Bill Clinton playbook -- tacking left, at least oratorically, so as to appease, rather than confront, their critics.

Hence, George W. Bush's "compassionate conservatism" -- a slogan that exceeded skeptics' worst expectations. That phrase, aimed at reassuring suburban white moms and queasy left-wing Republicans, became a white flag on the core issue of government size and might. Bush insiders even began boasting about "big government" conservatism -- oblivious to the fact that big government does not conserve or preserve; it crushes and digests, devouring institutions that challenge its supremacy.

Leaders in the Party of Lincoln stopped talking about people, and started talking about programs and expenditures. They justified head-snapping shifts in policy by claiming the need to take issues "off the table." The multi-trillion dollar Medicare "reform" is a case in point. It was designed less to save a system than to deny Democrats a talking point. Yet, the only things Republicans really took off the table were their moral authority and the loyalty of their partisans.

This helps explain one of the great ironies of the age. We live in what ought to be an era of Republican triumphalism. The president's one reliable bit of domestic-policy conservatism, his tax-cut agenda, has succeeded brilliantly. The most recent Commerce Department figures peg the third quarter economic growth rate at a sizzling 4.3 percent -- despite the ravages of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the oil shocks that followed.

Republicans have won the battle over whether centralized bureaucracies can eradicate poverty, or perform social services more efficiently than private or volunteer operations. Throughout the country, the same patterns appear: Where elected officials govern with a light touch and without imposing onerous tax and regulatory burdens, prosperity flourishes -- and people flock to the scene. "progressive" states, on the other hand, are becoming empty husks, with more rigid class distinctions than in any other section of the country.

The GOP also wins big on values. Virtually every time the ACLU files a lawsuit, Democrats lose supporters. Despite these advantages, however, the GOP founders. Its Washington potentates simply refuse to embrace the party's ideals or successes (including the war). They have forgotten the most important rule of political survival: If you want to remain an incumbent for long, you don't jettison your principles. You act on them.

When House Speaker Denny Hastert broke arms to secure votes for a pork-packed highway bill, calling the legislation a "jobs bill," it was an embarrassment. When the president signed a campaign-finance bill he called unconstitutional, he seemed to lack not only conviction, but vision.

Fortunately, irate constituents roused some conservatives from their dogmatic slumbers. Young Republicans rebelled against the apostasy of their elders, especially in the matter of the federal budget, and state parties seized the initiative on everything from spending limitations to school choice.

Capitol Hill Republicans now admit their Democratic colleagues don't want peace -- they want the Alamo. So the GOP is fighting back. Hastert approved calling the bluff of anti-victory Democrats last week by demanding a floor vote on the idea of vamoosing Iraq immediately. He scored another triumph this week by restoring the good name of the National Christmas Tree.

Who knows, he may even figure out the Paradox of Incumbency. Politicians who run just to protect incumbency may save their seats, but only by destroying their party's heart and soul. If you really want to build lasting power in politics, you need to forget about mere incumbency -- and remember the principles that got you elected in the first place.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 109th; alamo; cowards; foxnews; goalong2getalong; gop; pubbies; republicanism; republicans; socialismhalfspped; tonysnow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-440 next last
To: saveliberty

Ah...yes...I am sure, though, that he loved reading the "cat fight" posts the other day!!

I am not so sure that Mrs. Snow would be quite so amused.

BTW...I you have the stomach for it...be sure and watch the replay of Newswatch tonight on Fox...I am watching it now...and I am about to throw up.

There is officially not ONE of the panelists that is conservative....they are all liberal weinies..and their discussion about Murtha just now...was disgusting!


181 posted on 12/03/2005 3:40:21 PM PST by Txsleuth (9/11NEVER FORGET-NEVER SURRENDER, Sam Johnson, a REAL hero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Do whatever you can to get your voice heard. But let's don't shoot ourselves in the foot.

Beware of the "knee jerk" reaction!

182 posted on 12/03/2005 3:40:54 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: maxter

"Sadly, even the more conservative Senators and Representatives are playing the game. Re-election first"

So let me get this straight: our Republican Congresspeople don't listen to their constituents, only to some polls, so they can get re-elected???? Sorry, but that's democracy. If you don't agree with your Congressperson, and your Congressperson gets re-elected, doesn't that mean most of his constituents don't agree with you? Sad to say, because I agree with most of these posts, and with The Tony.


183 posted on 12/03/2005 3:44:18 PM PST by Anselma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 4integrity

"even those I've admired, like George Allen. I will no longer contribute until Senators, especially, begin to stand up for the reasons we elected them'

And also, they need to start publicly blasting Dem positions (or the lack thereof). Loudly. And start sticking up for the Pres, in this time of war.

What is wrong with these jerks?


184 posted on 12/03/2005 3:48:52 PM PST by Anselma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha

Thanks for ping. Sorry, I don't trust Tony Snow.


185 posted on 12/03/2005 3:51:18 PM PST by ex-snook ("Come behold the deeds of the Lord, the astounding things he has wrought on earth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Thanks for ping. Sorry, I don't trust Tony Snow.

I'm curious, why?

186 posted on 12/03/2005 3:55:28 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry

Yikes! :-) I will be hiding under my desk! LOL!


187 posted on 12/03/2005 3:58:40 PM PST by saveliberty (Shucks, did I break the feed again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth; Stellar Dendrite; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; Das Outsider; moehoward; ...
BTW...we need to remind him that the Barrett Report has been "hidden" from us again, while he has been away...

OMG! I JUST searched that...HOLY CRAP! I'm pinging the Posse!

A Thread already exists on it, but for my FRamigos that I'm pinging to this...here's a little snippet from Byron York's article on NRO...

There has been a major setback for people working to secure the full public release of the report by Clinton-era independent counsel David Barrett. A House and Senate conference committee has agreed on language that could keep key portions of the report secret forever, despite the efforts of Iowa Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Wisconsin Republican Rep. James Sensenbrenner, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, to make it public. Democrats, led by North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan, led the fight to keep the report away from public scrutiny.

(snip)

But the investigation did not stop there, because during the course of the probe, Barrett reportedly sought information about Cisneros' taxes and ran into a roadblock erected by the IRS. There have been reports that Barrett then spent a significant amount of time trying to investigate possible IRS misconduct, and what happened in the course of that investigation is apparently the subject of some of Barrett's final report.

(snip)

Now, the language of the House-Senate conference, giving the authority over release of the report back to the judges, seems likely to guarantee that Section 5, and perhaps other parts of the report as well, will never be released. It is a major defeat for Barrett, who last month told National Review that, "The Congress and the public have a right to know the contents of the entire report."

OMG! This just fits RIGHT in to the problem with these SPINELESS, BALL-LESS TRAITORS that have an (R) after their name, but squat to pee just like a DemonRAT!

Just what good is it having these (R)'s elected if they behave like this?!?!

No different than if Queen Cankle herself was on the Judiciary Throne!

Screw this! The Game is rigged, so time for a NEW game!

Time to DUMP OUT the 'RATs nest that is the House and Senate! Out with them all, confiscate their Pensions AND "War Chests"!!!

Might as well get rid of the guy in La Hacienda Blanco too, since he's more concerned with Illegal Infiltrators actually GETTING HERE, and not stopping what amounts to an Invasion of America, than he is with his oath to "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America form all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic!!

188 posted on 12/03/2005 4:00:59 PM PST by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Really? I will have to catch that on the replay tomorrow at 6:30.

Jim Pinkerton is usually very trustworthy on the right.

Cal Thomas can go either way.

Neil might as well be open about being a DNC covert operative (does this mean that I will be investigated by Patrick Fitzgerald?)

And Jane glorifies any horrible thing that someone in the MSM does.


189 posted on 12/03/2005 4:02:50 PM PST by saveliberty (Shucks, did I break the feed again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry
Beware of the "knee jerk" reaction!

Would that be the one that leaves you with your jaw wired shut and kicking yourself :)

190 posted on 12/03/2005 4:07:06 PM PST by Bahbah (Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Yup! LOL


191 posted on 12/03/2005 4:07:39 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry; Bahbah

HAH!

I found you!

Don't ever count me out from voting-- no way!


192 posted on 12/03/2005 4:10:21 PM PST by eeevil conservative (eeevil conservative is your beloved audience..........From the GREAT ONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; tiredoflaundry
HAH! I found you!

Shoot, tired, I thought those disguised were working. Back to the drawing board :)

193 posted on 12/03/2005 4:18:18 PM PST by Bahbah (Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

LOL!


194 posted on 12/03/2005 4:19:16 PM PST by eeevil conservative (eeevil conservative is your beloved audience..........From the GREAT ONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative; Bahbah

:-D


195 posted on 12/03/2005 4:21:44 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

:)


196 posted on 12/03/2005 4:22:28 PM PST by Bahbah (Free Scooter; Tony Schaffer for the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: 4integrity; Itzlzha
Both of you are saying what many of us are saying.

I truly HATE the RATs. They are vile anti-Americans. But, I will not support the Republicans. They have trashed everything conservatives stand for.

Of all the rhetoric, of all the millions of words quoted from the GOP in the last two years, show me the words "LIMITED GOVERNMENT"?

You won't find it, and if you do, it is from a hypocrite who does not vote for it when he/she casts votes. The Republican elected officials have abandoned the conservative movement.
197 posted on 12/03/2005 4:22:29 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tiredoflaundry; Bahbah

198 posted on 12/03/2005 4:29:13 PM PST by eeevil conservative (eeevil conservative is your beloved audience..........From the GREAT ONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: eeevil conservative

LMAO!


199 posted on 12/03/2005 4:30:46 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (The right wants victory, the left wants surrender. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I'm glad somone in the media finally said it. They are cowards and not doing what they were elected to do.


200 posted on 12/03/2005 4:33:48 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 421-440 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson