Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support For Hillary Clinton Presidential Bid Falls To Lowest Level This Year
Rasmussen Reports ^ | November 30, 2005

Posted on 12/02/2005 5:33:02 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

If Hillary Clinton runs for President in 2008, just 25% of Americans say they would definitely vote for her. That's down five points over the past two weeks. It's also the lowest level of support measured for the former First Lady in 2005. (Review Trends).

Forty percent (40%) would definitely vote against Senator Clinton. That's little changed from two weeks ago. Rasmussen Reports has conducted a Hillary Meter poll every other week since April. Only once has the number who say they would definitely vote against Clinton been higher than it is now.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beveryafraid; billclinton; clinton; communist; edwards; highertaxes; hildebeast; hillary; hillary2008; hillaryclinton; hitlery; ittakesabitch; ittakesavillageidiot; johnedwards; johnkerry; kerry; leftist; liberal; michaelmoorewhore; moveonorgwhore; notaboveappointments; raisetaxes; socialism; socialist; sumohillary; taxincrease; wickedwitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: Clintonfatigued

Peaked too soon...such a shame.


81 posted on 12/02/2005 10:38:03 PM PST by HardStarboard (Read Stephen Hayes "Spooked White House" - Weekly Standard. It explains a an awful lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I have the feeling that John McInsane would take more votes away from the Democrat candidate than from the Republican/Conservative.


82 posted on 12/03/2005 12:19:10 AM PST by rock58seg (My votes for Pres. Bush, the best man available, have finally borne fruit with Alito's nomination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
The Hillary jokes and scandals are virtually unlimited fodder!

Starting with Ol' Crusty the Black PantsSuit?


83 posted on 12/03/2005 12:22:48 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Hillary made a big mistake. She should have run as VP in 2004. First, because she could blame the loss on the Dem pres candidate and a win on her interjection into the race and secondly, there would have been National Polls.

All those loyal NYC people would have forgiven her for a short term.

84 posted on 12/03/2005 7:07:36 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Anyone notice that Hillary has been assuming the "posture" of the chick who plays her on this program? Shoulders back...always with some big deal at her side. New clothes!! What a drip!!


85 posted on 12/03/2005 7:11:00 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Yeah, I meant Mark Warner.


86 posted on 12/03/2005 7:34:14 AM PST by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Brown is strange and unpersonable, but if he hadn't declared in the New York primary that he might choose Jesse Jackson as veep (which got him no Black support but cost him all his Jewish support) he might have won it. After his New York loss Brown was finished.

In 2004 it is true that the Black vote was marginal to the selection process. The Moveon types solidified around Dean early and Gephardt and Lieberman didn't get any traction (I wonder why Gephardt didn't solidify Black support ? Ideas ?).


87 posted on 12/03/2005 7:51:42 AM PST by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
All she needs is a Ross Perot or Pat Buchanan spoiler type to run so she can win with 41% of the vote like her old man.

With the WOT the Country will not have the luxury to vote for Parrot. The 40% against is a killer since we only have to convince 10% of the fence sitters to take the WH. HilaryCare is deadwoman walking.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Winners

88 posted on 12/03/2005 7:58:55 AM PST by bray (Merry Christ-x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I hope "Shrillary"is the RAT candidate in'08.I want to hear ALL the positions she's taken on The War played back!She will make Kerry seem principled!!!!!!!!!!!!


89 posted on 12/03/2005 8:05:21 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

And don't think it won't happen -- but she has to get the 'rat nomination, first.


90 posted on 12/03/2005 8:18:12 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Her ego would not allow her to play 2nd fiddle to Lurch.


91 posted on 12/03/2005 8:30:48 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Sam the Sham

I can't imagine Brown being the nominee under any circumstances. If he had, Bush, Sr. probably would've gotten his 2nd term (or Perot).

Aside from Sharpton (and perhaps the Breck Girl), virtually all the 'Rat candidates hailed from areas where Black people couldn't be found, which I found more than amusing. Even in the case of Gephardt, his South St. Louis area was working-class Caucasian. All the Blacks were corralled into the 1st MO district.


92 posted on 12/03/2005 11:55:15 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Saca, I completely agree. They are only together now for image purposes, as always. And they really aren't even living together.

They are both out of power and here for our comic relief only. LOL


93 posted on 12/03/2005 2:33:01 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: msnimje
All she needs is a Ross Perot or Pat Buchanan spoiler type to run so she can win with 41% of the vote like her old man.

Hmmm...How's this: she sets up a three way race with a hardcore leftist third party candidate and pushing the GOP to the right, positioning herself as the centrist, the "unity" candidate of the great American middle. IOW she trades a few leftwing crackpots, loudly eschewing their extremism, in a "Sista Soulja" move, in exchange for a large gain among the "moderates" who will be impressed and now see her as a reasonable alternative to four more years of a too familiar GOP. It just might work to ease enough of that high "unfavorable" rating which right now looks fatal.

94 posted on 12/03/2005 2:49:54 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
Yes, Mc Cain would get at least 20% of the Rat Vote Easily...
95 posted on 12/03/2005 3:00:16 PM PST by cmsgop ( Bill Clinton's License Plate..... "Herpes 1")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I wouldn't put it past the Gang of 14...to form their own party by 2007!!!

I wouldnt either, and that just might be the split that gets the Hildabeast in. Like her husband, she can only win if someone splits the vote..

96 posted on 12/03/2005 3:16:22 PM PST by cardinal4 ("One man gone and another to go....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Most of this stuff is hilarious! Nice job on keeping things in perspective. :-) But some of you take your hatred for Hillary a little to seriously. :-(

If you need comedic relief or even someone to focus your hatred on, choose Osama Bin Laden. It's not becoming to choose someone who has a (slight) chance of becoming your next comander and chief. It comes across as unpatriotic.

On the other hand, if you want to discuss the pros and cons of Hillary as a presidential candidate in a serious manner, that would be very patriotic and probably fruitful. Don't forget that many people are still trying to decide what they think will be best for this country (myself included).


97 posted on 02/02/2007 9:13:42 AM PST by Dominic C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson