Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Disgusting!
1 posted on 12/01/2005 9:38:33 AM PST by FeeinTennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: FeeinTennessee
"My son can finally lay to rest," her husband, Kimo Aiwohi, told reporters. "And I'm very happy for my wife."

If he wasn't "human" then how was he your "son?"

2 posted on 12/01/2005 9:39:30 AM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

21st Century Dred Scott decision. Disgusting.


3 posted on 12/01/2005 9:41:24 AM PST by My2Cents (Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
Disgusting!

Nothing else really needs to be said. Totally insane.

5 posted on 12/01/2005 9:42:48 AM PST by yellowdoghunter (Thank you President Bush for Judge Alito!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

As disgusting as this ruling is, it is consistent with the "Culture of Death" advocates who usually try to contort the meaning of words to suit the purpose at hand. In a way, it may force their acceptable horrors into the daylight.


6 posted on 12/01/2005 9:43:08 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

The liberals will not stop until every unwanted pre-born baby is dead.

They want federal funding to pay for it, too.


7 posted on 12/01/2005 9:44:34 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
Supreme Court of Hawaii: 100% democrat party utterly corrupt lawyers


8 posted on 12/01/2005 9:45:44 AM PST by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

This, from the first state to make abortion legal. There is another case now pending where a pregnent woman was beaten into a comma by her boyfriend - again, drugs are involved. She is on life support and is now brain dead. The question now facing doctors and the court is whether to keep her on life support to eventually deliver the baby or disconnect her now and kill the "unhuman being". We wouldn't do that for animals but we will for "humans".


10 posted on 12/01/2005 9:46:15 AM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
Why shouldn't the potential mommy be allowed to harm her fetus? After all, it's just another part of her own body. A part with its own brain, its own heart, its own nervous system, its own digestive system, its own lungs... her own thoughts, her own feelings, her own dreams... her own pain...

Hey, wait a minute...

11 posted on 12/01/2005 9:47:15 AM PST by TChris ("Unless you act, you're going to lose your world." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

All this ruling does is carry the constitutional right to partial-birth abortion to the next logical step. It wouldn't be very logical to make intentional killing of an almost-born baby legal, but criminalize hist accidental harming by the "mother."


12 posted on 12/01/2005 9:47:15 AM PST by Restorer (They want to die. We want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
The Supreme Court of Hawaii has ruled that unborn children are not "human beings,"

Didn't the law say the same things about Negroes in the 1850s?

13 posted on 12/01/2005 9:47:48 AM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

So then the Hawaiian SC has ruled that a person can take whatever drugs they want to put into their bodies, no?

Your body. Your privacy. "Victimless crime" et al.


15 posted on 12/01/2005 9:49:24 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
So a baby is a person only when someone other than her mother causes her death? Culture of death logic.
19 posted on 12/01/2005 9:54:07 AM PST by manwiththehands (Democrats and the MSM: lies and hypocrisy on steroids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

So, I guess this means, in Hawaii, that if someone stabs a pregnant mother and kills the unborn non human then they can't be tried for murder if the mother lives? Or does this ruling, as so many democrat rulings do, only apply to the mother, does the baby miraculously turn human again if someone other than the mother kills it?


25 posted on 12/01/2005 10:05:18 AM PST by calex59 (Seeing the light shouldn't make you blind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

How was the baby able to "die" two days later, if it was not "born" and "alive"?

What, then, was the cause of death? How did the illegal drugs happen to be in the baby's system?

I truly am trying to understand the logic; but it just is not there...


28 posted on 12/01/2005 10:09:16 AM PST by fightnback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

>>>"My son can finally lay to rest," her husband, Kimo Aiwohi, told reporters. "And I'm very happy for my wife." >>>

Sick bastard.


33 posted on 12/01/2005 10:23:09 AM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; NYer; DirtyHarryY2K; cpforlife.org

Pro-life ping!


35 posted on 12/01/2005 10:30:30 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
"The proscribed conduct must have been committed at a time when Treyson 'qualified' as a 'person,' defined by the Hawaii Penal Code as 'a human being who has been born and is alive,'" they wrote.

If this is what the law says, do we want the law changed or do we want judges to decide based upon their own feelings about what the law should say?

Aren't conservatives against judicial activism?

SD

36 posted on 12/01/2005 10:32:37 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee
A little baby died, and the mother walks away scot-free.

I wouldn't bet on it. She hasn't met her maker yet!!!

39 posted on 12/01/2005 10:41:29 AM PST by bullseye1911 (If I have to explain it, you'd never understand!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

"The Supreme Court of Hawaii has ruled that unborn children are not "human beings," "

Obviously, a political decision and not a medical one.


42 posted on 12/01/2005 11:32:27 AM PST by WmCraven_Wk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FeeinTennessee

Have mercy, O Lord, for we are a profane people.


43 posted on 12/01/2005 11:58:57 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (Hoc ad delectationem stultorum scriptus est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson