Posted on 12/01/2005 9:38:32 AM PST by FeeinTennessee
If he wasn't "human" then how was he your "son?"
21st Century Dred Scott decision. Disgusting.
If he wasn't "human" then how was he your "son?"
Nothing else really needs to be said. Totally insane.
As disgusting as this ruling is, it is consistent with the "Culture of Death" advocates who usually try to contort the meaning of words to suit the purpose at hand. In a way, it may force their acceptable horrors into the daylight.
The liberals will not stop until every unwanted pre-born baby is dead.
They want federal funding to pay for it, too.
So mothers can't sue if their babies are injured before birth by some sort of medicine, either?
(And of course, since it's Christmas, we'll have to dismiss the notion that John the Baptist leapt in his mother's womb when Mary approached; since John wasn't a person then. . .)
This, from the first state to make abortion legal. There is another case now pending where a pregnent woman was beaten into a comma by her boyfriend - again, drugs are involved. She is on life support and is now brain dead. The question now facing doctors and the court is whether to keep her on life support to eventually deliver the baby or disconnect her now and kill the "unhuman being". We wouldn't do that for animals but we will for "humans".
Hey, wait a minute...
All this ruling does is carry the constitutional right to partial-birth abortion to the next logical step. It wouldn't be very logical to make intentional killing of an almost-born baby legal, but criminalize hist accidental harming by the "mother."
Didn't the law say the same things about Negroes in the 1850s?
"If he wasn't "human" then how was he your "son?""
Sounds like Kerry, "It wasn't her son before it was".
So then the Hawaiian SC has ruled that a person can take whatever drugs they want to put into their bodies, no?
Your body. Your privacy. "Victimless crime" et al.
The State of Hawaii has ruled that it is not a human being "yet".
Have they determined when it IS a human being?
Check this out:
http://msunderestimated.blogspot.com/2005/11/abort-child-be-born-again.html
Warning...the pictures on the site are disturbing. But it should be shown, just how horrible abortion is. And we are doing this to our children!
So if a mother smokes, or is married to a smoker and stay with him while breathing it in secondhand, should the child be able to sue if they are underweight at birth? What is Mom doesn't drink enough orange juice,or she doesn't take her vitamins, or she doesn't make all her prenatal visits?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.