Posted on 11/19/2005 9:09:09 PM PST by F14 Pilot
Once one of the seediest parts of Paris, the 10th arrondisement (district) has acquired an Islamic flavour over the past few years. Here, Arab, Berber, Turkish, Bosnian, Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan and black African shops and cafes are bustling with customers while a daily market that extends the full length of a street reminds visitors of Casablanca or Algiers. There are numerous mosques, often consisting of nothing but small shops or converted ground floor flats.
What is remarkable is the rich diversity of the various brands of Islam that exist side by side in freedom and security. These include sects that are banned in almost all Muslim countries where their members are persecuted, imprisoned and, sometimes, executed as deviants. In one small street where Pakistani shops run by Ahmadi, Jaafari and Salafi sects do business side by side, the owners have learned to talk together and, on occasions, even do business- something that is unimaginable in Pakistan itself where militants from rival sects kill each other by the hundreds each year.
In this French haven of peace you can live and practice your Islam the way you understand it- a gift rarely available in any officially Islamic country.
The reason why such a gift exists is that France is a society in which the private space is distinct from the public one. Your private space, that is to say your home, business, and place of worship is protected by law and allows you to organise and live your life as an individual in accordance with your beliefs, opinions and tastes.
The public space, however, belongs to everyone and thus to no one in particular. To be sure everyone can claim a share and use its facilities to advance his or her ideas, business interests and political projects. But no one is allowed to arbitrarily impose a decision or exclude anyone.
All this, to be sure, appears alien and exotic to most Muslims who have settled in France during the past decades. The reason is that they are taught not to recognise a distinctly private space in which the individual or even a whole community can do pretty much as they please provided they do not trespass on the rights of others. The idea of religion as a private affair is abhorrent to most Muslims. For Islam aims to rule every single aspect of individual and collective life, from the most mundane to the most sublime.
On that basis several Islamist organisations in France have tried to sow the seeds of anger in the French Muslim community for years. The extremist elements regard France as part of the Dar al-Harb (the House of War), because political power is held and exercised by the so-called infidel (kuffar). Moderate elements prefer the label of Dar al-Sulh (House of Conciliation), implying a conceptual no-mans-land between war and peace. Still others use the term Dar al-Dawah (House of Propagation), which means that the principal reason for the presence of Muslims there is to convert the French nation to Islam.
All three concepts are based on the assumption that it is impossible for a Muslim to live in a society in which secular law rather than the Shariah ( Islamic jurisprudence) is in force. A Muslim could never regard himself as a Frenchman until France becomes an Islamic state. This is why the organisations that claim to represent Muslims never use the adjective French. Rather, they describe themselves as Association of Muslim in France or Council of Muslims of France. You are a Muslim who happens to live in France, but never a Frenchman who happens to be a Muslim.
Such an approach, of course, can lead, at best, to a form of apartheid based on faith or, at worst, to religious conflict.
When Nicholas Sarkozy, the bombastic French Interior Minister, decided to solve the Islamic problem a few years ago, he knew nothing about Islam. He pushed through an ill-thought scheme under which something called the Council of the Muslim Cult of France was created under the auspices of the Interior Ministry and with public funds. An electoral exercise was made in which less than one per cent of Muslims eligible to vote participated.
Over the past few years, however, it has become clear that the councils principal role is ceremonial and protoclary.
During the current riots in suburbs where Muslims form a majority the council was not even able to forge a dialogue with the rioters let alone become an interface between them and the authorities.
Worse still, the council has fostered the illusion that it is possible to blend the various Muslim schools into a single one within a church-like structure supported by the state. The scheme could prove harmful not only for Muslims but also for the French state which, as already noted, is based on a clear, some might say excessive, separation of the public and private spaces.
It is impossible to develop a version of Islam that is acceptable both to all the Islamic schools present on French soil and to the French state. Even if such a version were developed it is certain than many Muslims would not accept it, forcing the state to use coercive measures to impose consensus.
France and other Western democracies that have become home to millions of Muslims, including an increasing number born there, offer Islam an opportunity that it had never enjoyed since the first Islamic civil war during Alis Caliphate. This opportunity consists of the possibility for Muslims to develop their own approach to their faith and to practice it freely and in accordance with their deepest beliefs without fear or hypocrisy.
France and other Western democracies are the only places where all Muslim schools freely propagate their ideas and maintain their places of worships and seminaries without restriction. In Muslim majority countries, the dominant school of Islam bans all other schools. Iran, for example, uses the label of Islamic Republic but does not allow a single Sunni mosque to be built in Tehran, a city that includes at least 1.5 million Sunni Muslims.
Elsewhere in the Muslim world sectarian feuds among Muslims claims thousands of lives each year.
France and other Western democracies are also the only places where no Muslim writer is banned because he or she is branded as heretical or deviant.
The key secret of the Wests success in reshaping the world is the freedom of thought and expression that it has fostered since the end of the Inquisition, that is to say when it realised that the abuse of religion for political purposes is a recipe for tyranny and terror.
For the first time in history large numbers of Muslims, may be up to 40 million, now live in societies where that freedom is equally available to them. The Western democracies offer Islam a space in which to flourish in all its rich diversity. Those who want to destroy this historic opportunity either by inventing a so-called European Islam or by urging Muslims not to feel at home in Western democracies are guilty of a double betrayal of both Islam and the West.
Time to go back to your turd holes.
" On that basis several Islamist organisations in France have tried to sow the seeds of anger in the French Muslim community for years. The extremist elements regard France as part of the Dar al-Harb (the House of War), because political power is held and exercised by the so-called infidel (kuffar). Moderate elements prefer the label of Dar al-Sulh (House of Conciliation), implying a conceptual no-mans-land between war and peace. Still others use the term Dar al-Dawah (House of Propagation), which means that the principal reason for the presence of Muslims there is to convert the French nation to Islam."
"All three concepts are based on the assumption that it is impossible for a Muslim to live in a society in which secular law rather than the Shariah ( Islamic jurisprudence) is in force."
The thrust of this article appears to be that Islam should be thankful for western freedom of religion as it allows minority Islamic sects to practise in freedom - something no allowed in Islamic States.
But is own content reveals this premise to be defective.
"You are a Muslim who happens to live in France, but never a Frenchman who happens to be a Muslim."
This is true in any country which is not Islamic and where Muslims are permitted to settle.
WEstern civization is still held hsotage by the crimes of the Holocaust. The murder of six million Jews, plus Gypsies and other European and western minority groups by the NAZI extermination machine has been the Shibboleth lurking in the backround which prevents western society from the hard, but essential stps necessary to insure its own survival - steps which can in NO way be equated with the Holocaust.
Western Countries must fcae the obvious: Islam and western civlization are totally incompatible. To permit more Muslims to migrate into western countries is to add to the real danger of self-destruction by the presence of these elements.
The immigration of all Muslims must cease, and those already here should be subjected to the very same kind of treatment accorded non-Muslims in Islamic Countires , e.g. any attempts to proselytize must be forbidden, construction of new mosques and madrassejs forbidden, any public Islami religious displays banned, Muslims kept from holding any public offices, in short everything necessary must be done to create a great dissincentive for those Muslims already here to remain here as practising Muslims.
What has happened in France is a dress rehersal for EVERY non_Islamic nation foolish enough to believe that acceptance of Isalmic immigrants and tolerance of Islam will be appreciated by these people. The overwhelming number of them view there presence here as a directive from Allah to convert the west.
We must view that perspective as a directive from God to resist them.
Maybe we should adopt Maria law instead of Sharia law.
Make moozies dhimmis and listen to them whine!
Aap aap ahh dap dap!!!!!
It's a religion of peace
It's a religion of peace
It aint Slim W, but this'll gitr done!
Kill A Commie For Mommie
What the Muslims need is a PLANET of their own. Then they can live in the 12 century without causing those of us that are normal any further problems.
Take two aspirins and if it doesn't work by morning, see a good psychiatrist.
Timing is critical or your condition will deteriorate.
Yes, France's democracy is temporarily providing the 'freedom and security' for these Muslims to practice their various brands of Islamicism in the same community without killing each other off, but over time this growing Islamic presence will tolerate its host democracy less and less. In other words, give them time to fully introduce Islamic culture and tradition and the peace will cease to exist. (Well, actually it already is disappearing as France's automobiles and communities burn).
How about a large space at the bottom of the ocean?
Those three statements are the foundational problem with Islam's relationships with other sovereign entities. These Muslim concept need to be exposed far and wide in order to understand the cultural/religious war at the Wests feet.
The goal of radical Islam is to dominate the entire globe creating Dar al-Islam, a house of peace. By killing you if needed.
Typically bureaucrat arrogance to think they can assimilate Muslims even among themselves by force, by government edict, what Muslims themselves for 12 centuries have not been able to do
illusion is too weak a word.
Wonderful.
Let 'em buy some property in the suburbs and build a mall.
Freedom myass!
"...the obvious: Islam and western civlization are totally incompatible. To permit more Muslims to migrate into western countries is to add to the real danger of self-destruction by the presence of these elements...The overwhelming number of them view there presence here as a directive from Allah to convert the west...We must view that perspective as a directive from God to resist them."
It is insane to tolerate what is intolerable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.