Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boomers Aren't Going Anywhere
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | November 13, 2005 | Ruben Navarrette Jr.

Posted on 11/13/2005 5:45:33 PM PST by RWR8189

SAN DIEGO -- People are busy talking about what this country is going to look like in a few years when a cohort of 78 million Americans acquire a title they never wanted: senior citizen. Hippies who turned into yuppies are about to turn into golden oldies. Just what I wanted to hear: more about the baby boomers.

USA Today recently wrapped up a series on aging in America that touched on everything from life expectancy to saving for retirement to long-term health care issues.

The newspaper insists that by the year 2046 -- when those Americans who were born from 1946 to 1964 are between 82 and 100 years old -- it'll be a boomer's world. As far as boomers are concerned, the future promises to be, well, to use one of their words, groovy.

The way the article paints it: ``Thanks to lifestyle habits and medical advances, they probably will be the healthiest group of elderly in history. Thanks to extended employment spans, they will be the wealthiest. Thanks to their huge voting bloc, they will be the most powerful.'' So basically the boomers will have their health, plenty of cash, and lots of political clout to get their way.

And the point is? That's how it is now. Americans can't make it through a presidential election without rehashing the Vietnam War. The phenomenon began when the nation's first boomer president, Bill Clinton, was accused by some of dodging the draft to avoid going to Vietnam. The phenomenon reached ridiculous new heights in the 2004 election with the emphasis on Swift boat veterans and George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard.

And when Bush started talking up the need to reform Social Security, he framed the issue as a system in crisis because the program wouldn't be there for boomers when they retire. He also tried to head off any criticism from boomers by assuring them that any changes wouldn't affect those who were 55 and older.

Nobody seemed to care much about the financial burden that will almost certainly befall the two generations that follow the boomers -- Generation X (now in its 30s and early 40s) and Generation Y (in its 20s and teens) -- just to keep Social Security afloat. Certainly not the boomers. What they care about is what the future holds for them. And why should that surprise us?

This generation has never been plagued with low self-esteem or the sense that the world didn't revolve around them. This is, after all, the generation that helped deliver on the promise of civil rights for blacks and Hispanics and equal rights for women, that fought and helped end the war in Vietnam, and that helped drive a corrupt president from office. You could stop there, and already have enough to say grace over. Not boomers.

Listen to how Newsweek put it in a cover story this week on the boomers turning 60: ``They and their siblings invented not just the epiphenomena of youth culture -- blue jeans and rock music, sexual permissiveness and political alienation -- but the very idea of youth as a separate realm of experience and knowledge.''

That's a heck of thing to have on your resume, or to break the ice at cocktail parties. ``That's Fred over there. He's a baby boomer. He invented youth. Good for you, Fred!''

But even the egotistical baby boomers can't escape Father Time. And so, the latest product being pitched is retirement planning. Financial services companies are running commercials that rely on lava lamps and images from the 1960s to convince boomers that they really are getting older and approaching retirement age, and that it's time to plan their exit from the work force.

Good luck with that. Boomers don't seem to be in any hurry to leave. This is the generation that doesn't think the rules apply to them, and that includes rules about getting old and retiring. The Newsweek article mentions a retirement survey conducted by Merrill Lynch that found that 81 percent of boomers plan to work past the age of 65.

Expect many boomers to work from home, perhaps log shorter days and weeks, but to keep on working as long as their minds and bodies hold up.

These folks aren't going anywhere. But you knew that.

© 2005, The San Diego Union-Tribune


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; boomers; genx; greedygeezers; retirement; rubennavarrettejr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: stylin19a
81 percent of boomers plan to work past the age of 65.

That's 81% of those who haven't been downsized out of real careers, maybe 100% of those who have had to resort to lesser work.

21 posted on 11/13/2005 6:09:43 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"They and their siblings invented not just the epiphenomena of youth culture -- blue jeans and rock music...

False. Rock's inventors were pre-baby boomers born in the 20s and 30s -- Chuck Berry (1926), Elvis Presley (1935), Buddy Holly (1935). Even the 2nd generation (mostly from the "British invasion") were pre-baby boomers born in the War years.

22 posted on 11/13/2005 6:10:12 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Hey....you been spying on me ?

We're going stick around like a brother-in-law.
You kids ain't EVER going to make it to the adults table on thanksgiving.
23 posted on 11/13/2005 6:12:44 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie
A new survey of 1,000 baby boomers in Massachusetts found that nearly half, or 48 percent, believe they will have to work past age 65 to make ends meet.

I cashed out last year, before the implosion that will happen in the housing market if lots of people leave. That money will go a long way in some other parts of the country toward an affordable house and life-style.

24 posted on 11/13/2005 6:13:59 PM PST by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: qam1

ping


25 posted on 11/13/2005 6:14:16 PM PST by kenth (Come back here... so that I may brain thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
"BOOMER" does not apply to anyone because of what year they were born.

It is, rather, an insult (a well-deserved one) for the select personalities who set out to ruin this country in every aspect of their miserable lives.

26 posted on 11/13/2005 6:14:30 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("I was born a Democrat. I expect I'll be a Democrat the day I leave this earth." -Zell Miller '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
The Boomers' have destroyed American for too long and a anti-socialist payback's a bitch

Beware of blanket statements, for they are often false. Plenty of Boomers are strong conservatives who plan on working 'till they drop. I might also remind you of a quote from your own homepage:

"There is nothing wrong with America that Americans can't fix"- Reagan

27 posted on 11/13/2005 6:15:33 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Great. More democrats in Florida.


28 posted on 11/13/2005 6:16:04 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The question the article doesn't address is this: what will happen after 2045, when the boomers finally do die off?

A huge amount of capital will be transferred, and a huge tax burden will be removed. People who had to work hard all their lives to get by will suddenly have it much easier. What will they do?


29 posted on 11/13/2005 6:16:12 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

There is some serious navel-gazing in this piece...


30 posted on 11/13/2005 6:17:44 PM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Great! So they'll migrate somewhere else and fark it up too.


31 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:06 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Generational collectives are as stupid as biological ones. Does anyone think all Boomers think as Boomers? If we were all drones in one time-span why are there still two parties and very devisive politics? Hey Hey we're the Monkees.

Generational angst is the dumbest dumbass perspective the world has produced - mainly only young teenagers use it, excepting this author, and, those commercial producers of the Monkees.

32 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:30 PM PST by kcar (The UNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Yeah, except they want their free drugs, bigger SocSec payments, free power chairs, etc. etc.


33 posted on 11/13/2005 6:20:57 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US

Given where the boomers' heads are generally located, if they're navel-gazing, it's an inside view.


34 posted on 11/13/2005 6:21:23 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

This is a good thing. As people get older they tend to get more conservative. Not to mention the "old people trying to get into heaven now" effect.

This could all work out rather well.


35 posted on 11/13/2005 6:21:48 PM PST by Dreagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised
I would disenfranchise every single Boomer in the country who didn't have combat experience in Nam or later.

And later generations would get a pass on this requirement of service? How convenient.

36 posted on 11/13/2005 6:22:08 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheGeezer

Agreed. The children of the "Greatest Generation" have just about ruined this Nation.


37 posted on 11/13/2005 6:22:37 PM PST by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Uh, the later generations HAVE served. I know I have.


38 posted on 11/13/2005 6:22:39 PM PST by Appalled but Not Surprised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Elvis Presley (1935)

1936, actually. ....and then there's Lennon ('40), Dylan ('41), McCartney ('42), Hendrix ('42), Jagger ('43), Richards ('43), Robertson ('43), Waters ('43). ......not one baby boomer in the bunch.

39 posted on 11/13/2005 6:22:57 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
And one of the reasons while seemingly every other television commercial these days is for a drug product -- impotence, high cholesterol, heart disease, depression, you name it. .....and the last 30 seconds of these commericals is dedicated to listing all the (usually very nasty) possible side effects at lightning speed...

And you do not understand why the "side effects disclaimers"? Get back to me after you dial 1-800-CLASS-ACTION suit.

40 posted on 11/13/2005 6:23:17 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson